So when it comes to decide whether to listen to the (broad) mainstream of science or to someone who is willing to act within a documentary by a far-right anti-vaccine Trump-supporting propaganda newspaper I rather do the first.
@invertedisdead – What can I say? :-) I'm not a scientist myself so I have to decide which stream to follow, and while on many fields I tend to be very interested in what's left and right the mainstream, science doesn't seem to be ideal for that
You must be mixing with up with someone else, I didn't even post that Epoch Times video; and at no point did I ever mention any "left" nor "right" dialog in any of my posts.
I'm the guy interested in science, who posted the scientific paper that I'm sure nobody bothered to read. I guess that's pretty typical with scientific papers, and legal legislature lol.
Also „left“ and „right“ were not meant to describe political flavors.
So anyone who is not interested to read a paper by a very fishy person and waste time with her is not interested in science? Whoa. :-)
Can you clarify what they were meant to describe?
The problem here is, you are confusing the molecular biologist from that Epoch Times video with the Wuhan virologist from the research paper I posted
What molecular biologist Dr. Judy Mikovits has to say is certainly interesting [...]
plus the dubious source. Because I think it's very crucial to take a critical look at the sources. Sorry, I should have been a little more specific about it.
I hear if you bend over, spread your cheeks and get some UV rays on the old third brown eye, it will cure anything that ails you!
The penetration of the deep arse state is murky and virus laden like the primordial soup brewing within the fetid dankness of a bat cave, ie. trump’s cranium.
Yeah, but what bats, the best bats, powerful bats, genius bats. Maybe we can get those bats, you know, inside the body? We have the best bats, I know, you know, its not what you'd say, but you know, and I heard it from.... The best people have light bats disinfecting them. Maybe thats something we can look into.
Can you please pass this on to the White House ASAP? Maybe it can still make it onto today's klepto-mercial. It would be awesome to have the president muse about a great American Canna Cloud or some such thing. "Ah, Dr. Birx, you can look into that, can't you?"Judy is actually a leading expert in her research on medical cannabis and the endocannabinoid system. So getting this thread back on track, and the whole corona vaping, I'll leave you with a quote from noneother than molecular biologist, Judy Mikovits.
"Cannabinoids containing THC will actually turn back on your interferon response pathways, which is key to your innate immune system, clearing retroviruses at the dendritic cell level.
The effect of endocannabinoids on the orchestrators of the immune response, the monocyte/ macrophage, is a key therapeutic target to modulate sterile inflammation and protect tissues from damage from excessive inflammatory mediators."
She actually spoke at the recent Canna World Expo on this exact topic.
"During the expo, cannabis expert and researcher Dr. Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Microbiology, will address retrovirus immune modulation with cannabinoids and COVID-19."
WAIT! THIS DISINFECTANT CONTAINS OPTICAL WHITENER!
Yup.“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951)