Interesting about your mouth piece.. The tolerance for glass manufacturing is fairly big compared to other materials so the glass pieces do vary. Some people here would argue that a stem too long is a blessing in disguise because they like to use the water tool as a mouth piece to get the most air tight vaporizing experience possible.
The mouth piece issue doesn't seem to be a tolerance issue as the internal pathway makes a definite diameter change at the point at which the mouth piece won't pass through and, the glassware from my first Ascent fit my second without issue.
Anything's possible though.
No biggy in any event because as I mentioned worse case scenario is I shorten the stem. I've done laboratory glassware before and although it's been a while, I do have three stems to practice on to get it right for at least one. ;-)
Good tips on the screens. I've played around with all kinds of different screen variations and I have found some that work just as well as the spacer in terms of keeping your load small and packed.
Moral of the story, it seems that one can get good results almost no matter what one does. Donncha hate it when that happens? :-)
What works best for "you" is well, kinda sorta what works best for "you", most of the time, hopefully.
On the subject of "packed", I've found that the Ascent effectively works as a conduction vape if packed and more of a convection vape if loose.
Either way, I can cloud you out with nothing more than an oven-bottom covering, packed or loose. Does that make me ambidextrous?
One thing among many that I love about the Ascent is its flexibility. From a one-hit-wonder to a party pass-around it fits the range pretty well. That seems to be due to the vaporization being performed and delivered simply and efficiently without a lot of complication.
Vaporize on one end of a glass pipe and inhale on the other. Not much to get lost in translation there.
As Einstein is said to have mentioned, [paraphrasing] "Keep it simple, but not TOO simple.".
On the reliability issue though, maybe a bit more complication would have helped? LOL
Seriously though, of course I would love to have the confidence to know that a given device will last forever and a day but at the same time, if I didn't love my Ascent as much as I did and do, I wouldn't have even bothered to return and replace the first one.
The reason your second unit was different then the first is because we began doing repairs instead of replacing units. The other advantage to this, is that when your unit is out of warranty we now have an option to pay for a repair after the two years is up.
You guys are now repairing instead of just replacing? Cool!!!
Eons ago I was a tech in a R&R department for a phone equipment manufacturer and a large part of what went into future development came out of our Repair and Returns department so it's good that you guys can get some hands-on with failed units. That's a significant progression.
More so though, when I got the entire kit as a replacement I was like, "So what am I supposed to do with this?" I can easily clean and rotate glassware and screens so that the initial set would do me and the oil-pots while having their uses, aren't something I needed four of LOL and, I don't read manuals anyway out of principle ;-) so I needed two manuals why? LOL
I did appreciate the second sticker though. The back of my car is now better balanced because it has one Ascent sticker at either side of the back bumper. I've found that good balance enhances the driving experience. LOL
Anyhoo, I was very happy to see that being able to essentially extend the possible lifetime out indefinitely with your being able to make repairs.
For what it's worth, NOTHING I own that I really care that much about is maintenance free.
Except when it's not, the Ascent is a very solid unit from both a reliable/repeatable point of view as well as an ease of use point of view.
Thanks for the good tips!
My pleasure. :-)
Oh, one thing I've been meaning to ask, my Ascent is Burled Walnut, which actually matches the interior of my car perfectly, but that's a subject for a different thread, but it seems to me that all three of the Ascents I have had had different patterns in the grain pattern of the burled walnut.
Is each one actually unique in that regard or is it just that I didn't have each successive one at the same time as the previous one and so not being able to directly compare, had/have to rely on a memory that has exceeded it's "Best if used by :" date?