Lwien,
You are correct about people being funny about their preferences. However, I don't see anyone calling anyone else, literally or figuratively, a "bunch of tin heads." To me, it seems any sarcasm is directed at the fact that Tom will take any chance he can to put down Rick and his product. He did it in the very first post of the PD thread, before Rick was here to defend himself, and he continues to do so now.
Look at how this recent thing started. I don't know what stinkmeaner's motivation is. Maybe he is emulating his namesake (google stinkmeaner and boondocks)? But stinkmeaner's posts are besides the point.
tomitface made a post about finding Ed's wooden vapor stems and was informing those in the PD thread.
Tom's brought up lead in his reply, but of course he tried to play it as if tomitface's suggestion brought up lead, which it didn't.
That is where the sarcasm is directed, Lwien. Not at you. Not at those who wish not to take a chance with brass. it is directed at Tom who will not pass up a chance to rehash the brass issue. At Tom, who obviously thinks others are not too bright as he stirs things up but acts as if others are doing so.
So, take stinkmeaner out of this. Yes, he is keeping it going by arguing with y'all over there. But Tom brought up lead. Consider this:
If Tom had made this reply to tomitface,
Purple-Days said:
Please, don't link to other (non-PD-endorsed) products through our official thread. There probably should be a rule. please delete that info. It is not welcome.
Then there would be no brass in the discussion. But even stinkmeaner's reply to Tom was about members being able to make suggestion in the threads. His argument was about allowing folks to share their "experiences and ideas," and again Tom brought up the lead. Again, there was no need to. Tom could have just addressed the points stink was making, but instead he, again, complained that others were bringing up the lead issue.
Purple-Days said:
The Lead in Brass, that was used by another mfg., keeps getting dragged into this thread. Let it be, and it will die...
But up to this point Tom is the only person who mentions lead, stinkmeaner addresses it in a subsequent post, as he is chastising others for mentioning lead. Check it out and be honest with yourself.
Who brought lead into the conversation? Not tomitface (the post that started it all), not stinkmeaner (who, for some reason needs to argue with Tom and keep it going). Tom did, and then he tried to make it seem like others brought up lead.
Fuck, I hope no one posts saying, "I just had a pb&j sandwich and then got vaked with my PD."
Because Tom would say, "Please refrain from abbreviating peanut butter. It brings up the lead (Pb) issue, you know the issue about AromaZap using leaded brass and you are associating the PD with a product that admitted to using brass. But you abbreviated peanut butter for a purpose, didn't you? You Zap guys just can't stop dragging this issue into my thread."
Serously Lwien, do you think Tom could have replied to tomitface and stinkmeaner without bringing up leaded brass?