I'm confuzzled , the charger isn't a power adapter and the power adapter isn't a charger. I'm no electrician guy but I didn't know that was possible.
Well, at the risk of sounding glib, it obviously is possible. In fact, IMO, it's a pretty logical way to do it.
The power requirements are really entirely different between charging a battery and replacing it. To charger you need a higher voltage and lower current (since you can't charge the battery too fast anyway). A pretty modest supply will do the job easily.
Running the vape takes a lot more power. It's at a lower voltage, since it's got to more or less match the lower battery voltage rather than the higher voltage needed to overcome the battery condition and force charging. However, since we need more power at this lower voltage, we need LOTS more current. This calls for a more expensive (by far) supply, one that is not a very common 'size'. It's going to cost a lot more.
You wouldn't be willing to pay the extra $20 (IMO a pretty good bargain, considering) for the more powerful supply (in case you need it to run as a PA) and probably a similar (or nearly so) increase in the electronics in the Solo (and decrease in reliability too, of course) forced by the need to change the voltages electronically since they no longer are supplied at the correct value for the job? Meaning you'd have to make the 12 Volts for charging from the 9 Volts (but higher current) provided to support the PA function not everyone is wanting.
Consider the PA form MFLB, forcing everyone to buy one with their box would bring the cost of the PA down, but drive the customers bonkers I bet.
A possible alternative is the scheme some laptops and cell phones use where you can charge while running from the battery. This is not really the same, of course, the battery needs to charge a large percentage of the time.....generally the very thing guys are trying to avoid. And again, cost and complexity would go up since Solo now cleverly uses the same processor that controls the heating to control the charging instead in that mode. Sharing the display and some of the internal components. This allows them 'lower hardware count' and gives more reliability through having fewer parts in play.
So I get the frustration, but IMO it's a very logical and very 'customer friendly' way to do it. I like it, although I'm not too big on the apparent voltage sensitivity.....
That's really crazy! mines still working, it must have to do with the range of power the charger possesses like OF said.
Lucky guess......
Bummer of a problem (they all are to the guy with 'em I guess). Lucky it's got a simple solution for many/most. I wish we knew what the bad supplies were doing, anyone have one and access to a meter?
Alternatively, you may buy a pack of .583" (14.8mm) screens and put one or two of them in the actual unit, it helps with air flow. I have one in mine right now, and it eases the restriction.
I think I posted about this. I messed with this some but found I got much better results with a small piece of wire. I figured the metal part of the screen mechanically blocks over 3/4 of the area, the improvement can be much better.
I ended up with an inch or so long piece of fairly small wire (.022 sounds right?) bent in a V shape. To keep it in place I bent the 'arms' out enough so they'd spring out and grip the walls. The last bit was to bend the ends of the arms outward at the tips so they hit the wall square on. This way only the tips of the arms and the angle part at the bottom block the airflow. 3 tiny points.
I abandoned it after I started messing with these 113 rings though. It no longer seems as useful.
OF