Arizer might have decided against higher capacity batteries but our own
@CentiZen has been making
replacement packs for the Solo with 3400 mAh batteries for quite a while now. Many of our members use them happily. I don't know if they have a much shorter lifespan but I'm not aware of any failures yet. Many people would gladly trade lifespan for higher capacity anyway.
This is a conversation that has been had several times in the past on the forum and I think we will just be rehashing the same points made in those discussions before. I can appreciate OF's position, Arizer knows their product better than I or other reverse engineers will and may have contextual information that lead them to make the 2200mAh choice over the 3400mAh choice. And the 2200mAh cells are the popular choice amount most manufacturers. But why is this?
I can tell you for sure that I have had less than a 1% defect/return rate on these batteries, and in most cases the issues are related to user error and not following the installation instructions. I cannot speak for VapeFiend or other manufacturers, as I am performing my own QC. This is spanning the near year I have been operating, and from what I can the entirety of the first batch is still going strong.
If you look at the business side of things here (in Arizer's context) we are looking at around 2-1$ per cell for a 2200mAh 18650 cell. The market for these cells is wide open, it is very easy to procure large amounts at a time and there are multiple suppliers that allow Arizer to hedge their supply chain.
Now, the NCR18650B regularly fetch over 10$ for single pieces, and get down to ~6$ in an order of thousands. They are produced by one company and the market for these cells is being disproportionally dominated by Tesla as they ramp up the production of their cars. I have had serious difficulty getting a reliable supplier that can keep large amounts of these in stock; and even then the volume discounts are much lower than those on other options.
So like I said, I can understand and appreciate the position that higher capacity packs may not be the best option. But I disagree with the assertion that these packs will have a decreased lifetime, as in my own (albeit, anecdotal) experience they have lasted even longer than the stock pack while still providing a higher capacity. The 2200 is the popular choice because it makes the most business sense - if your a profit based business making low cost consumer product and your looking at 500-1000% the cost for less than a 50% upgrade in capacity, it just makes sense to design your product with the cheaper, smaller battery.
Or to put in a different light - if the 2200 is objectively the best option, why would Tesla choose the 3400mAh cells for their cars? If these batteries were more prone to failure than their smaller cousins, I have no doubt they would not be powering the most advanced electric vehicles on the market. I think it comes down to is a cost/benefit analysis; not that one is objectively better than the other.
I don't want to derail the thread or get into a big argument about this - but I welcome anyone who would like to have a discussion about this to reach out to me through PM. I understand that I don't know everything and if you think I am missing something I'd be glad to talk.