Does anyone know if the charge and heat feature has a negative effect on overall battery life? I wouldn't have thought it would, but according to vapefiend.co.uk it does?
I don't think any of us are in a position to really know since they haven't been out very long. And even then getting reliable numbers to compare is not easy since owners will have different patterns of use.
We differ in our assumptions, however. I assume it will since the old scheme (PA)
didn't rely on the battery while the 'charge and use at the same time' scheme, unlike a cellphone or laptop, charges the battery for a dozen seconds or so then discharges it (to add to the low power from the charger) to run the heater on the next cycle. That is the battery gets a heavy workout but doesn't end up charged.
In the old scheme you can remove the battery and still run PA mode, no longer possible?
I'm not sure cutting the recharge into little slices changes anything. Using the battery is using the battery and should wear it out faster than not using it.
However, as a practical matter, the new design is all you can buy new, right? It is what it is. Best, I think, to not lose any sleep over it, instead enjoy your Solo? If/when the battery dies, replace it or the whole Solo? A 'back of the envelope' calculation is like ten ounces (300 cycles times 8 sessions per cycle times 1/8 gram per session). Good bud here is like say $15 a gram? So we're talking $4,500 in bud against $200 for a new Solo? 2%? Less than half a percent if you replace the battery?
I've used super fine steel wool to clean out a really dirty Solo bowl
I also recall another fellow saying he'd used steel wool (with ISO IIRC). I think the SS bowl has some sort of passivisation on it (based on the color), did this survive the adventure? TIA
OF