Thank you for your research! I also have Dynavap mesh capsules, and I didn't know the size of the Anvil bowl yet, but I was sure they would fit in the bowl. But I don't want to use them, because it's unacceptable for a minimalist to serve capsules of different sizes.
Now I use capsules from Fenix and V3 Pro in both TM2 (having made a custom cooler) and Hyperdyn. Before I found out about the existence of Hyperdyn, I was forced to use 2 different capsule sizes, because only small capsules will fit into the standard Dynavap. In general, the appearance of hyperdyn made it possible to abandon small mesh capsules, because it also contains capsules from Fenix and V3 Pro!
By the way, Hyperdyn works just fine with capsules! Also, I noticed that on my micro-quantities of the loaded material, Hyperdyn hits harder than TM 2, which is not surprising, because for the first seconds in TM2, unheated air can idle through the flower, evaporating, but not activating thc. In Hyperdyn, I start to draw air only after a click, i.e. the flower is fully warmed up and there is no idle movement of air through the flower.
All these thoughts motivated me to try Vestratto. I am sure he will be able to strike even harder, due to better heating of the incoming air and a greater thermal mass. Judging by the dimensions of the Vestratto bowl you have given, its internal size cannot be increased by drilling, only if it is sawn off, as
David Root did..
But the question arises - if I saw off the bowl to use the capsules, will the heating principle laid down by the developers be violated?The air must first go between the outer wall and the wall of the bowl (in my case, the capsule) and then pass through the bottom of the capsule, rushing to the exit. In this case, the capsule must be tightly clamped inside the tip. Will I be able to provide this by sawing and refining. And the question also arises -will there be a difference in the modified Vestratto compared to the existing Hyperdyn? Considering the cost of Vestratto..