Thank so very much for asking me to clarify my post. I am NOT in favor of ICE unless it's in my Marqarita. We can discuss ICE later. I was referring to the violence and destruction only. I believe I did mention in one of long winded posts that I thought that the military was brought in prematurely. There is your context.The entire context of this discussion is the military being brought in to LA. What did you mean by this if you weren't referring directly to the Marines and National Guard being sent to LA in response to people standing up to ICE? What other possible context could there be for this:
Well, I am responding here as a private citizen and i don't think anything Bazinga has said to me above is over the line anyway.
ACAB, including mods.![]()
My last post was made prior to seeing this one. No need to apologize. I appreciate your posts and discussions. Please don't stay away long.I get it, thanks!
And my apologies to @Bazinga.
I will take his advice and ignore his rabbit holes for a while.
You asked the question:Thank so very much for asking me to clarify my post. I am NOT in favor of ICE unless it's in my Marqarita. We can discuss ICE later. I was referring to the violence and destruction only. I believe I did mention in one of long winded posts that I thought that the military was brought in prematurely. There is your context.
It absolutely was the government. It was ICE. Everything follows from that. The people of Los Angeles are defending themselves from the government (ICE).Who attacked Los Angeles first? It wasn't the government.
Just to be clear, I think you are being disingenuous. I think you plainly know why the military was brought in, and who is responsible for the "riots". If not, that was why I recommended you turn off the right wing media.Grass - thanks again for allowing me provide the clarification. Thanks for not being confrontational.
It is a common acronym. Essentially it means that anyone working for the police, no matter their intentions, is acting for evil. There are no cops because the institution of policing is corrupt in its founding, organization, and daily function. To be a cop is to be complicit in gang style violence and destruction.What does ACAB mean?
This is why I said you are being disingenuous. You literally replied to a message where I quoted you saying:My comments had nothing to do with who came first
Who came first? The government.Who attacked Los Angeles first? It wasn't the government.
I would happily disrespect any individual cop or the police as an institution. However I was merely stating historical facts. Policing was created out of existing slave patrols in the nineteenth century. They were converted to their current form in order to violently suppress the labor movement. They continued to rain down state violence on our communities as part of the war on drugs. Any claim of friendly policing or protecting individuals is ahistorical propaganda.Disrespecting the police claimihg that all police corrupt without proof is, I will borrow your word, is disingenuous.
haven't figured out why they burned Waymos
I hate to break it to you but this premise you cling to is a LIE! what evidence do you have that peaceful protesters are the one that cause all the damage & destruction??? You make that implication in your statement but it is not true. Where is your proof?I will state again I'm only referring to the violence and destruction caused by the unruly group. Businesses were looted, vehicles were set ablaze (haven't figured out why they burned Waymos), etc.
Trump's Labor Secretary from his first term was the Florida prosecutor who gave Jeffrey Epstein a sweetheart deal because he was told Epstein, "belongs to the Intelligence Community".
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney and fellow pedophile, Alan Dershowitz, defended Trump during his Impeachment trials.
Jeffrey Epstein died under mysterious circumstances when Trump appointees were in charge of the Federal prison system.
Anyway, I'm glad it turns out Epstein was innocent, and he killed himself because there was no evidence against him. We can all move on now![]()
“Let it go, Indiana”Disney wants to reboot Indiana Jones. That's crazy. Anyway, does anyone remember the context of the screengrab they used here?
![]()
Disney Reportedly Planning Full Reboot of the INDIANA JONES Franchise — GeekTyrant
It looks like Indiana Jones might actually be headed for the reboot treatment. According to a recent report from DisInsider , Disney and Lucasfilm are considering a full relaunch of the iconic adventure franchise. While nothing has been officially announced, The report said: “Lucasfilm is legeektyrant.com
![]()
"Its hot, dam hot, real hot" yeah fk summer it's the worst bloody season, only good for growing tomatos & pot. The reptiles like it thoughI went to Lowe's Home improvements, at noon....
![]()
They're absolutely the scum of humanity. Don't care if that upsets you.