1. What does SSTB mean? See our glossary of acronyms.

Marijuana Oil Bill Passes KY Senate

Discussion in 'Cannabis News and Activism' started by Jambi619, Mar 14, 2014.

  1. Jambi619

    Jambi619 New Guy

    Messages:
    67
    Location:
    IL
  2. Caligula

    Caligula *results not typical.

    Messages:
    6,636
    Location:
    So Cal
    And yet in California they are trying to pass a bill to ban it...
     
    SSVUN~YAH likes this.
  3. Jambi619

    Jambi619 New Guy

    Messages:
    67
    Location:
    IL
    Sweet irony
     
  4. pakalolo

    pakalolo RoboMod v3.17 (ticking) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,125
    Location:
    Other side of your screen
    Kentucky is obviously the left-leaning liberal state of the two.
     
  5. JSteez4205

    JSteez4205 aka Gordon NugzB

    Messages:
    283
    Wow never thought I'd read that.. KY more of a left-leaning liberal state of the two.. Ky has Always been a very right-leaning conservative Bible Belt state, which is what makes this bill passing all the more remarkable! I love it. Things are finally starting to happen in the Blue-Grass state and I'm ready.. We're trying to push through medical marijuana as well.. With our agricultural representation already seen via tobacco crop cultivation, it only makes sense we start cultivating a plant that helps people rather than harm them..
     
    SSVUN~YAH and Jambi619 like this.
  6. C No Ego

    C No Ego Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    105
    someone with authority in that state found out about cannabis and woke up and realized someone they care about can benefit from the oil. that is how it works, now they will do what needs to be done to get access.

    once someone knocks on your front door you either let them in or leave them on the porch...
     
  7. grokit

    grokit power cosmic

    Messages:
    4,839
    Location:
    the north
    SSVUN~YAH and Snake Plissken like this.
  8. Snake Plissken

    Snake Plissken Transcendentalist

    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Oregon
    As happy as I am that autistic children and people who suffer from seizures are able to find relief from cannabis - I am sick of everyone (especially lawmakers) thinking that these are the only conditions that should be considered. These guys want to write the law based on a couple damn sanjay gupta specials.

    In my state, while they do accept pain, nausea and cachexia - there are very few qualifying conditions/diseases which are accepted. I have a disease that will never go away, that many drs feel could be alleviated by using cannabis - yet they won't add chronic pancreatitis. Here they are stuck on cancer/glaucoma, like the newbies are stuck on autism/seizures - because it was more 'relevant' at the time.

    When they draft these laws towards certain very limited criteria, I believe that they are doing a disservice to all patients who don't fit into their box. I get why these issues strike a chord w/ the common person, but wish these guys were more all inclusive. I mean really, drs and researchers have been coming out in support of medicinal marijuana for a long time now and they don't listen - but the second gupta does a mainstream show the legislatures want to jump on board and draft policy accordingly?
     
  9. pakalolo

    pakalolo RoboMod v3.17 (ticking) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,125
    Location:
    Other side of your screen
    You are expressing the reasons why I will not support medical cannabis. It's a regulatory trap that will screw everyone who falls outside the boundaries they draw. It opens the door to even harsher penalties for recreational users, and even worse, for people who need it but who don't qualify.
     
  10. Snake Plissken

    Snake Plissken Transcendentalist

    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Oregon
    Can't say I don't understand your point or totally disagree. The 'regulatory trap' was exactly what I was thinking about when reading the article.

    I do feel a lot of the problem is w/ how poorly drafted these bills are. The only real solution is decriminalization. While I believe it should be legal for recreational use, I do think medical need supersedes recreational play. A recreational user is not going to suffer and potentially die w/o it.

    I, also, will not support a recreational bill that doesn't have precise language protecting medical users and grower rights separately. I don't think Wa or Co would have recreational use right now if medical use didn't pave the way.
     
  11. grokit

    grokit power cosmic

    Messages:
    4,839
    Location:
    the north
    The main thing I dislike about mmj is that if the "authorities" ever decide to change their mind, patients would be on a list they have of "criminals". Unfortunately we're still all criminals in the eyes of the federal government, with the exception of ptsd military veterans. Good for the VA.

    Otoh, without mmj, mj decriminalization would not be happening as it is now.

    In a more perfect world, we would be able to see realistic, non-political comparisons between mj, booze, and tobacco, with special attention paid to the health benefits of vaporizing vs. smoking/combustion.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2014
    Tom Funk, steama and SSVUN~YAH like this.
  12. steama

    steama analog dog

    Messages:
    746
    Free the plant. Everything else is just bullshit.
     
    natural farmer and grokit like this.
  13. Jambi619

    Jambi619 New Guy

    Messages:
    67
    Location:
    IL
    grokit likes this.
  14. MinnBobber

    MinnBobber Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    289
    Good job for all that pushed it thru. Like others have said, it isn't wide enough on what is allowed but maybe it is a first step.
    Here in MN we are fighting the same battle. Our proposed law sounds just like yours, for seizures, but our governor said he'll veto it as law enforcement doesn't support it.
     
    Snake Plissken likes this.
  15. Snake Plissken

    Snake Plissken Transcendentalist

    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Oregon
    That's fucking ridiculous. when did law enforcement start dictating state rights? Their job is to enforce the law, not mandate it. It used to be that whatever stupid decision leo came to on the side of the road, you would have your day in court and the judge could decide how to interpret circumstances.

    A few years back a semi drove me into a ditch. Since I left tread marks trying to escape the situation, and the trucker didn't, I got cited. Once in court, the judge said that was stupid but that he only had the power to knock off up to 25% of the fine (which he did). Outraged, I questioned him on who was really dictating law in this situation, and he confirmed it was the cop on the street. When did this happen? In what other situations does this happen?
     
    Dr. Soxhlet, Jambi619 and grokit like this.
  16. MinnBobber

    MinnBobber Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    289
    Yes, it is totally f'in ridiculous. Cops enforce the law, not make the law. So for medical MJ they should be listening to the medical community which has huge numbers of supporters. MMJ seems to have potential for a HUGE list of diseases.
     
    Dr. Soxhlet and grokit like this.
  17. grokit

    grokit power cosmic

    Messages:
    4,839
    Location:
    the north
    Time for a new guvnor, the good people of MN will NOT be denied :nope:!
     
  18. sundrk

    sundrk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    63
    Wait really? Is there any leeway on this? Honestly oil is like the "crack" version of flowers but I still love it.
     
  19. Caligula

    Caligula *results not typical.

    Messages:
    6,636
    Location:
    So Cal
    Tom Funk and grokit like this.
  20. Dr. Soxhlet

    Dr. Soxhlet SOLO Vaporized Cannabis is my Best Medicine

    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Washington State
    It paved the way, but now the politicians and the Liquor Control Board wants to dismantle Medical Marijuana in Washinton State. A lot of changes have been proposed and even passed by one house, but none of them are good for patients. Plant count goes from 15 to 6, Possession Limits from 24 oz. to 3 oz., Oil reduced fron 72 oz. to?? Affirmative defence in court--Gone. Only "regular doctors" will be allowed to make recommendations, businesses that primarily get their revenue from making recommendations will not be allowed. The last time I tried to talk to my "regular" doctor about cannabis, he tried to get me into rehab....clueless.
    The Catholic church just took over administration of half the area hospitals, so this does not surprize me.
    I saw this stuff coming which is why I Did Not vote for I-502. Seemed to me the whole thing was crafted by law enforcement and politicians. And a 5 nanogram threshold for impaired driving. More revenue for the State-----Isn't that what all this is about---People don't matter, only money.
    I've sent emails the legislature and Liquor Control Board in the hope public pressure will sway them.
    So there's another target on my back!!!
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2014
    Snake Plissken and grokit like this.
  21. Snake Plissken

    Snake Plissken Transcendentalist

    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Oregon
    I think the same thing sometimes. A six plant count is ridiculous. Here it is defined as '6 mature plants'. Anything over 12" qualifies as mature whether in veg or flower, not accounting for teens at all - they really could of used a botanist on the panel to explain the life cycle of a cannabis plant. The loss of an affirmative defense was lost here as well - which is huge. We have a 24 oz limit, regardless of what form it is in. Some growers can't grow inside and only do 1 outside crop a year. A 3oz limit would screw them.

    Leo in southern Oregon has always been the biggest threat to mmj here, and they actually supported some of the legislation being drafted by some of these knuckleheads, it was so skewed in their favor. Mostly the attempt to include 'agricultural zoning' terminology - which would basically have shut down small grow operations.

    The suggested changes you are referring to are exactly what I try to warn people about when dodgy bills are put out there. Once achieved, mmj/grower rights need to have separate, written, standalone protection even when recreational use is permitted. The gov doesn't want medical users to be self sufficient, they want them to stand in line w/ everyone else - paying ridiculous tax for often times subpar meds.
     
    Tom Funk, grokit and Dr. Soxhlet like this.
  22. Dr. Soxhlet

    Dr. Soxhlet SOLO Vaporized Cannabis is my Best Medicine

    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Washington State
    The whole concept of plant counts is to make it easier for law enforcement to bust people. Here in Washinton State the commercial growers get an area, so many square feet. They don't have to worry about number of plants. Last year was the first time ever in my 64 years did I feel comfortable growing it outdoors. Huge plants in a greenhouse. The harvest lasted me about 8 months. Under the new rules I would no longer be allowed to do that. People have no idea what a struggle it is to grow these plants properly. I just want to grow my medicine and be left in peace.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2014
    grokit likes this.
  23. grokit

    grokit power cosmic

    Messages:
    4,839
    Location:
    the north
    Sounds about right/wrong (what happened to strikethrough?).
    Maybe try writing the local newspaper(s) as well?
     
  24. pakalolo

    pakalolo RoboMod v3.17 (ticking) Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,125
    Location:
    Other side of your screen
    Strike-through has been moved to the Insert drop-down (rightmost in the Insert group in your toolbar). Don't blame FC, that's a change in the new version of xenForo.
    :shrug:
     
    grokit likes this.
  25. syrupy

    syrupy reitcello - it's what's for breakfast

    Messages:
    1,465
    It's interesting how the focus is on BHO. A few years ago here in CA, some dispensaries shied away from the "B" word. It seemed to have an association with production of narcotics (meth labs?). If you asked, they'd say their concentrates were all CO2 or some other method (wink wink). Nowadays they seem more open about just calling it bho. But if laws like that passed, people would just call it CO2.
     

Support FC, visit our trusted friends and sponsors