Colorado Task Force: Let Tourists Use Legal Pot

Colorado Task Force: Let Tourists Use Legal Pot

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/color....1086383.ye48TQ&rd=1&src=newsletter798457&t=3

If lawmakers agree with the task force recommendation, tourists will be free to get stoned in Colorado.

February 20, 2013

The Colorado task force in charge of setting up regulations for the state’s legal marijuana has decided to let tourists in on the weed, the Associated Press reports. Lawmakers, law enforcement and marijuana policy activists on the task force assembled and agreed Tuesday that Amendment 64 legalizes marijuana for all adults at least 21 years old, and does not exclude out-of-state visitors.

Members of the task force were concerned whether allowing tourists to purchase marijuana would encourage or discourage illicit sale. "Imposing a residency requirement would almost certainly create a black market for recreational marijuana in the state," task force member Rep. Dan Pabon, a Denver Democrat, said at the meeting.

Regulators agreed that marijuana tourists should be warned via billboards and airport signs not to take Colorado marijuana home, and that an undetermined limit of sale should be established for non-residents.

If lawmakers agree with the task force recommendation, tourists will be free to get stoned in Colorado. Still, whether they, or anyone else in the state can do so in public is up for a more heated debate.

According to the Associated Press:

Task force members were less successful agreeing to recommendations on marijuana growing and public use. Colorado's marijuana law allows home growing but requires plants to be in a locked, secure location out of public view. The task force couldn't agree whether a "locked" and "secure" location would mean a backyard surrounded by a fence, or whether an enclosure such as a shed or greenhouse should be mandatory.

Greenwood Village Police Chief John Jackson, whom the AP called “one of the task force's most vocal marijuana critics,” expressed concern that a chain-link fence would not be sufficient in keeping kids out of a backyard pot garden. Prominent marijuana policy activist Meg Sanders disagreed, and said requiring coverings like greenhouses would be unfair.

"I think it goes too far in restricting what people can do on their own private property," Sanders said at the meeting.

According to the AP, Jackson and like-minded members of the task force also want to ban marijuana use on publicly visible patios, porches and backyards.

"So I can drink a beer on my porch? But I can't smoke a joint?" marijuana advocate Christian Sederberg chided at the meeting.

State Sen. Cheri Jahn (D-Wheat Ridge) also warned against regulating the use of a legal substance on private property, asking, "What about backyard grills that send the smell of hamburgers into the nose of a neighbor who's vegetarian?"

"I don't know how far we want to go telling people what they can't do on their own porches," she said at the meeting.

The task force created by Colorado governor John Hickenlooper has a February 28 deadline for marijuana regulation recommendations, which the state legislature and Department of Revenue (which oversees gambling and alcohol) will ultimately decide.

In the meantime, residents and visitors can learn more about their rights to legal weed in Washington and Colorado here.

Can they please stop using children as an excuse to make restrictions tighter?

One of the things they talk about is if a fence will be enough to keep kids away from plants...

How's about there's better education for kids about cannabis so that they understand it isn't a good option for them (until they get older and are no longer considered kids).

Or, how's about teaching kids that TRESPASSING and THEFT is wrong and dangerous?
(Isnt that the exact thing a lot of people want guns for over there, to stop people breaking onto their property and stealing their stuff?)

Oh, and I don't see anyone wanting alcohol to be kept in locked enclosures to stop kids getting to it...

/rant

The rest of the article is interesting though, maybe Colorado can become the new Amsterdam?

Salutations Frederick,

...and lets not forget dad's pornographic collection, mom's cigarettes, the young neighbour's game console or an older sister's damn cell phone, TV reality shows, Ritalin, pain killers (ultimately), etc... Briefly put anything addictive in our modern society! Money gambling, guns... Maybe even religion in some extreme cases! Because the bottom line is the anti-cannabic warriors hide behind themes such as addiction, brain development, marginalization... The funny thing is they're addicted to bigotry & violence while needing to trust reason instead of ignorance - which is what prevents everyone to hug together!

My husband said they would probably say something like..."It's still illegal while you're in the air, so we cannot allow you to board the plane with it.

Salutations PakaLolo,

Woups! It sure sounds most likely, i'm afraid Vicki has got a point!!

Which way to Colorado?

When I said that, I was thinking about a flight between Washington and Colorado. Flying over non-medical states, non-medical "air space," for lack of a better term.

http://www.theweedblog.com/can-you-fly-with-medical-marijuana/ Doesn't pertain exactly, but interesting.