A Guide to Vaporizering

Discussion in 'Vaporization Discussion' started by Vape-Nation, Jan 5, 2013.

  1. Vape-Nation Leader of Vape-Nation

    Message Count:
    22
    Location:
    SF
    Hi Guys, I've been putting together an overview guide to vaporizing, including research and links to lab reports, detailed photos of the vape process, tips on grinding and lots of information about various types of vaporizers.

    Having spent a 150+ hours on this, I'd love to get some feedback from the community to see if it's missing anything, or if any information strikes you as unfair or not totally clear:

    Behold — Vape-Nation's guide to Vaporizing:
    http://www.vape-nation.com/vaporize-marijuana-guide/
    Nbajunkie likes this.
  2. Stu Maconheiro

    Message Count:
    3,734
    Location:
    Southeast of Disorder
    Looks very nice, Vape-Nation.

    Personally, I would replace your references to getting "high" with something like "effects" of marijuana. There are a lot of patients that seek real medical relief to their symptoms, and I feel like simply refering to the "high" does not convey the most positive message that medical cannabis could convey.

    :2c:
    Vape-Nation, Qbit, max and 1 other person like this.
  3. lwien Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    7,524
    Location:
    Arcadia, California
    Yup, for a lot of medical patients, the LAST thing they want is to get high. They just want the bud to address their medical issues.
  4. Frederick McGuire Aggressively Loungey

    My :2c:
    I notice you don't have a standard term for marijuana over the course of the guide, sometimes it's
    Marijuana
    Cannabis
    Herb
    Bud
    Pot
    Weed

    I would personally avoid "pot" and "weed" as they tend to have a less favourable implication than the others.

    It would also be nice if there was a degrees Celsius referenced somewhere near the big thermometer that shows vaping temps in Fahrenheit.

    Any time I see Fahrenheit now, I don't even bother converting, I just ignore it...
    Qbit, kingofnull and Stu like this.
  5. kingofnull ace

    Message Count:
    2,154
    Location:
    Canada
    I'd just stick with cannabis.
    Qbit, ShipDit, Puffers and 2 others like this.
  6. pakalolo RoboMod v3.07 (stable)

    Message Count:
    3,536
    Location:
    Other side of your screen
    All of the recommendations here are good. I agree that you should stick to one term, cannabis, and that you shouldn't focus on THC. All of the actives are important.

    I'd avoid stating specific percentages for efficiency. Some people actually wind up consuming more simply because they find it easier and nicer to vapourize.

    Avoid absolutes. Not all plug-ins use whips, and some take 30 minutes or more to warm up. Think log vapourizers. Not all portables are pocketable. The Solo and FlashVAPE are luggable but really don't fit well in a pocket.

    You've listed the MFLB as an example of a convection vapourizer. It is in fact the vapourizer that proved you could make a great conduction design. Before it arrived, conduction vapourizing had a really bad reputation.

    In your example of vaped herb, you say that the nugget is "not too wet or dry" but in my experience, the drier the better. Drying concentrates the oils.

    Well done overall, congratulations.
  7. mwahle1 Member

    Message Count:
    37
    Location:
    Chicago IL
    Very nice Job!
  8. Vape-Nation Leader of Vape-Nation

    Message Count:
    22
    Location:
    SF
    Great points about 'getting high' and 'weed', I tried to cover a broad use of words, but I like the idea that avoiding some of these words is better for the reader and guide contents. so I'll try to edit out some of those.

    Great suggestions. It's hard to find consistent info on some of these topics, so I tried to consolidate the info.
  9. Seek Apprentice Daydreamer

    Message Count:
    1,020
    I think the CBN molecule is wrong.
    Vape-Nation likes this.
  10. Egzoset Level √-42 HerbalAire Vaporist

    Message Count:
    1,757
    Location:
    Shawinigan/Qc, Canada
    Salutations Vape-Nation,

    During the 1st 10 seconds or so my impression was that the "All About Grinders" category could be renamed something like "Preparation", so you can include extracts and edibles, eventually.

    An external resources section might be usefull too, i'm thinking about SeedFinder to select the strain according to one's needs, etc., etc.

    :peace:
  11. Vape-Nation Leader of Vape-Nation

    Message Count:
    22
    Location:
    SF
    corrected; thanks!
  12. ShipDit Proud felon since the 1970's

    Message Count:
    681
    Location:
    The great Mid West Wasteland
    Very user-friendly. Damn good job man!
  13. undertheshade New Member

    Message Count:
    13
    Love this! Personally, I enjoy how you say, "getting high", as that's why I (and honestly, probably most users around the world) use marijuana. But yes, it’s true that this term might exclude certain medical users (many of whom make up the population of forums such as FC).

    Ultimately, it depends on what audience you're going for. IMHO, replacing "getting high" with "feeling the effects" would be a good choice, as this doesn't really leave anyone out, but using terms like "medicating" might be a little rarefied - not that anyone has suggested that.

    I also agree that "weed" and "pot" have certain connotations, but once again, it's all about what your chosen demographic is. I enjoy all of the ideas suggested here, as words like “effects” and “marijuana” are very inclusive to all people. If you’re looking to appeal to as many users as possible, I’d say that’s the best way to do it.

    5 stars! I'll definitely refer this to friends who are just learning about vaping. Keep adding and editing!
    ShipDit likes this.
  14. JCat Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    678
    Location:
    Ontario
    I'd just like to throw this out there as it's something that seems to come up ... I'm a medical user ... I get enormous medical relief from the use of cannabis. I am also an advocate of recreational use as it's not harmful like other things like alcohol. I am also a quite involved member of my community, both through business and with my kids, and my father and grandfather were teachers in this Town and I have the IT contract with the municipality etc. When speaking to people and this comes up ... I will refer to myself as a "pothead" sometimes ... I guess it's a way of trying to "own" the term that has had such bad connotations in the past. "hey look ... a pothead isn't necessarily a burnout but can be a successful, contributing member in our Town ... " ... it's like the Simpsons' or The Family Guy ... blatant is sometimes effective at getting a message across.

    That being said ... if someone called me a pothead ... I would be offended. I own the term, since I am a cannabis user, but other people do not have the right to use it on me unless they have earned that right. (Does any of this make sense? ... feel I'm rambling ...)
    eln00b likes this.
  15. undertheshade New Member

    Message Count:
    13
    I'm right there with you, brother. I really enjoy marijuana, and often participate in "weed culture", but there is a stereotype (think "pothead", "stoner", etc.) that really isn't representative of me in any way, other than the simple fact that I use marijuana. I don't dislike those who do fit that stereotype, in fact, I tend to quite like those people! But it's frustrating sometimes to be misrepresented, simply because of that: it's misrepresentation.

    IMHO, as long as stereotypes exist, it's inevitable that some amount of misrepresentation will exist as well, and sometimes I will be the victim. Unfortunately, I'm sure that sometimes I misrepresent others and make them victims, too! In the end, I just try and focus on spreading love and joy and making that the priority above all else (and I often times fail at doing this).

    And, I will admit, I also have the side goal of trying to get them high at some point. ;)
    JCat likes this.
  16. vorrange Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,560
    Did not have time to have a thorough reading but two thoughts, nothing very important though:

    1- i would use the title: let's vaporize cannabis. For the same reasons as said above, certain words have certain conotations, especially for people who don't like the plant. Why not keep it a little more formal for a change?

    2 - Why use two volcanos instead of putting another good plug-in like the herbalaire? Or the cheap but trusty vapolution for example?

    I'll come back with more suggestions when i have a bit more time.

    Nonetheless, great guide, and good info overall. It shows you took the time to do something right, i like it!

    You also forgot Log vaporizers like the UD, american craftsmanship and all.. :p
    Vape-Nation likes this.
  17. Vape-Nation Leader of Vape-Nation

    Message Count:
    22
    Location:
    SF
    You guys rock! Thanks sooo much for this very thoughtful and wonderful feedback. I'm hoping to find some time this next week to make some nice updates and smoothing out the language more.

    Cheers and thank you all again. I love FC, because of you guys!
    vorrange likes this.
  18. TriiKLe Member

    Message Count:
    65
    Location:
    USA
    Over all it is a great guide.

    What was your motivation in spending so much time to make this guide?
  19. Vape-Nation Leader of Vape-Nation

    Message Count:
    22
    Location:
    SF
    I'm a designer/photographer/writer/former-smoker turned vapester with a little too much time on my hands. Plus I like to tinker.
    TriiKLe likes this.

Support FC, visit our trusted friends and sponsors