I remember, in elementary school, they tried to have us sing the song. If I recall correctly, after we kept yelling out "marijuana" at the appropriate time (At a volume greater than the rest of the song--for emphasis.), they changed it to a smoking hot girl. (Senorita que fumar)
R COLAS from da garden outside without pesticides?
we have exacting biochemistry ... still however the researcher stipulates as to findings ( Bias) ... we have enough research to prove how the lipids in cannabis metablize in our bodies .... the known biochemical pathways ETC ....... it takes understanding of all that to put two and two together and make a conclusion etc.... for example vai my research the lipids in the plant Are Essential lipids in our cells ... THC as an example is an essential fatty acyl ( N acyl tranferases/ N acyl ethanolamine pathways ) ... and of course the seed oil is essential fatty acids ... raw plant uingestion provides essential amino acids and Flavones/ flavinoids too ... the only real negative to health we have to prove is that the cannabis plant can be caught on fire and burning ETC.... car tires are capable of that as well LOL
What tha uck ever.. Keep vapin..
420intel.com
and that """ Study""" most likely tested people who smoked it only .. inhaling smoke by product adds another level of metabolic reactions not related to just metabolizing a plant alone with no smoke involved etc.... Even vaporized and inhaled dry herb cannabis eliminates all those aromatic hydrocarbon smoke toxins while delivering most of what you will receive from smoking it .Today we’ll be talking about the latest “SCARE STUDY” where researchers allege that smoking cannabis as young adults nearly doubles your risk of a heart attack. This was a “cross-sectional” study meaning it’s an observational study that analyzes data of a particular population at one particular point in time. The major problem with cross-sectional studies is that the way you frame the question vastly influences the results. The parameters you choose to test also plays a major role. Essentially, they took some data, created measurements they thought were important and did some fancy math. Their confidence level is 95%, which means that there may be fluctuations in their results if someone tries to replicate this, let’s say, with actual empirical evidence.A Closer Look At The ‘Smoking Weed Causes Heart Attacks’ Headline Scare
Every now and then I’ll hear about some new “dangerous aspect” of smoking cannabis, whether it’s your brain shrinking or having more risks of going insane – these reports have been circulating since the dawn of prohibition. Today we’ll be talking about the latest “SCARE STUDY” where researchers...
Although heavy cannabis use has been reported to trigger acute myocardial infarction (MI), the current evidence is limited to case–control studies that are prone to bias and studies relying solely on administrative data. In other words, they are relying on data that isn’t telling them the whole picture. I’m not saying that cannabis doesn’t have an effect on the cardiovascular system – to say this would be nonscientific. However, to make conclusions on administrative data is also non-scientific.
Right now, you’ll begin to hear people talk about the inherent risks of cannabis and cardiovascular health based on this study, which will influence the international discourse on legalization. This influences how we legalize and is disingenuous to the truth behind the plant. It is because of these studies that prohibition could thrive for so long. They claim these policies are meant to protect us – but what we need is not protection but proper education.
Once issues becomes grist for the media and political mills, they never resolve, and pot smoke is one of those issues that just keeps giving. I am for everybody making up their own minds and just letting it go.On CNN today from the American Heart Association statement.
Weed is not good for your heart, studies say | CNN
You may love smoking weed, but it does not love your heart, according to the American Heart Association's new scientific statement on marijuana.www.cnn.com
Medical data are mostly about smoke, quite only 10 years than vaporisation tries to democratise..
The sympathetic stimulation/stress is easily triggered. Which will "put in exergue" any weakness your body can have.
If I could just get a few of those seeds.......May i have to send u a bit of my weed, to let u feel an heart attack
The seeds aren't enough,..If I could just get a few of those seeds.......
Sinsemillia is a condition to get high thc strain.
If u really read it, u will find no solid argumentation putting cannabinoid as heart "complication giver" for now.I know one thing that is definitely bad for your heart...
...reading this thread and worrying about all these things
If u really read it, u will find no solid argumentation putting cannabinoid as heart "complication giver" for now.
As most of user have experienced a "bad" sympathetic stress once. the "palpitation" it gives, will always make people worry...
Try to beat usain bolt at a 100M, u will have even more reasons to worry about your palpitations
Worrying is what have kept humanity alive till now,...
Moi dans les "hauts"..
Plutôt bien bas..
there was just a study done too that showed drinking green tea along with cannabis use reduces THC' side effects somewhat ... it was actually a study for teen use if I'm not mistaken ... one of the latest form Grannystormcrow list
something i thought about today was that Tea itself has something in common with weed.
I've got some Himalayan CBD by Sensi Seeds (1:2 cbd) recently. What a good high... I could even do 15min of jumping rope with a big smile and a really nice smooth feeling on each landing, after getting a good toke on my vapcap. I never could do sports after a classic thc strain btw.
