It should recover very quickly once the air is not flowing. But I have not talked at all about that.
My point is that due to the lower mass of the heater compared to a ball vape, it should suffer as the rest of the portable heaters and not be able to fully heat as the air is passing, despite its 130W.
As mentioned several times, the TM2, TP80 and Hopper all show that this is possible using a small mass heater without the addition of a flow meter and in the instance of the TP80, doing it while using software originally intended for different purposes. Those definitely can keep up with my constant draw and they heat up faster than the speed currently advertised for the Venty.
If you believe an oven with small mass can keep up while air is passing, what is the point off having a high mass oven? Why go through the hassle of having ball vapes? Just use a low mass oven, as you believe it still can keep up. But in reality there is a difference, hence why ball vapes have become popular.
I don't know, what's the point of a car that goes faster? A vape can have different designs, different materials, and different use cases, right? Someone who is constantly on the go and is only at home to sleep is going to have little use for desktop ball vape, meanwhile someone suffering from chronic pain might need to have one at the ready at all times so they can medicate quickly. I don't know why people come up with the designs they do, I assume they see a need and try to fill it.
Ball vapes were cobbled together by hobbyists initially using off the shelf parts. Most of the ball vapes made by most companies today still use the same off the shelf parts. This includes the PID, coil, balls and only in one or two cases is the housing manufacturing and PID not outsourced. They also have the luxury of what is effectively an unlimited battery, so there are no constraints on power usage or design like you'd see with a portable. Part of the reason that they're are so popular is that yes, they perform well so users like them, but they're also relatively easy to manufacture mostly due to the availability of the aforementioned off the shelf components. Creating a specifically designed heater and all that entails will typically have a much higher initial capital outlay than designing and manufacturing a container for glass balls that can be wrapped with a coil. I'd bet if you counted the new releases from the last year or two, the number of new battery powered vapes is probably similar or less than the number of new ball vapes that have been released.
@invertedisdead has created a 14mm ball vape, which is about half the volume of your typical 18mm ball vape, maybe even less and it works just as well and better in some cases. So you don't need a high mass oven per se, it's just that most of the smaller manufacturers today tend to jump on trends, and some consider making their devices the same or similar size as advantageous to their respective businesses for interoperability as accessories from other manufacturers could then potentially fill gaps in their respective product lines. Sometimes economic or other considerations beyond straight performance play larger roles in the creation of some of these devices.
Mind you, in theory, and in line with German engineers reputation, it should be able to consume bawls quicker than any other battery powered device (I struggle to call it portable) just because it has almost double the power of any other commercial device out there. My point from the beginning is that I struggle to see how the flow control will help the PID as the heater should be already maxed out while the air is flowing.
And for third time, all of this is just in theory and I am willing to be proven wrong when we see it in use.
We're all waiting to see, but I think some of the examples already given in the thread have answered your questions with respect to how a small heater would be able maintain temperature given that there are no less than 3 units that have comparably sized heaters whose designs have been on the market for over 3 years now that can handle temperature over extended draws easily and without issue. All 3 of these have half the battery power or less than the Venty. I can attest to this as I have all 3 of those units.
Do you believe that S&B would launch an all new product with their first new design in almost a decade that performs worse than a Mighty but costs 25% more? I could see why someone might think that, but I'm not of that opinion personally.
Regardless of the semantics of how anyone wants to define combustion, the physical phenomenon remains unchanged.
In fact, it is interesting that you bring the toast example because there were studies warning about having too much balck areas in the toast as those areas had the same composition (with the cancer risk) as a fully burned toast. And that does not change whether you call it burnt or not.
Cancer is irrelevant to the discussion of combustion. I can stand out in the sun, get "burned" and develop skin cancer, but I don't think anyone would suggest that I combusted, or microcombusted at any point.
It's not semantics, it's a chemical process. From the
Charring vs combustion thread:
No, that's not true. Black doesn't mean combustion. Black means black, usually by charring, but ironically often it's actually proof combustion didn't happen. Charcoal would be an example. Once wood products, charred and pressed, awaiting combustion on your command. Black and charred, but not yet combusted. When it is, it'll be much lighter and gray ash.
Combustion is a chemical process, not a physics issue. It means chemical reaction(s) happening and different molecules than were there before. And it liberates heat, which is how we get into trouble with it, once stated as long as there's air there, it makes it's own heat to keep going (and grow if it can). Very different than using physics to separate out the good stuff by evaporation (vaping).
Black material in your ABV is proof you got it hotter than you probably wanted to (at least at that point). But a little or a lot isn't proof of combustion. Ash would be since it didn't exist before the adventure.
Or so they taught me when the world was new.
OF
@OF hasn't been around in quite a while, I liked how he'd wander into a thread and drop a few gems to help raise our collective IQs just a bit. Hope he's doing well.
So I'll repeat the question that has not been answered: in your opinion, what is the reason pure convection vapes have smoother vapor than hybrids, and hybrids smoother than conduction?
This is subjective and everyone will give you a different answer. How do you define smooth? I guarantee you, your definition will be different from the next person. A person who smokes cigarettes will have a different opinion of what smooth is vs. a non-smoker etc.
For me, smoothness/harshness of the vapour is affected more by the condition of the material and grind consistency. I find well conditioned material, ground coarse tends to be much less harsh and causes me to cough much less.
I'm curious to find out if the smaller heater will give the same S&B vapour signature as their other devices? I always felt that at comparable temperatures, the Mighty, Crafty and Volcano all had very similar tasting vapour.