Rainbow and Rasta
Well-Known Member
@Jojofernz @WirtDog sorry guys I’m just being very sensitive about this when it seems to be going in circles and I guess to me it just comes on like bullying and not knowing when to stop
I do not understand why its a big deal? S&B is a great company...been around for awhile. Huge fanbase, they communicated with me every step of the way and made it pretty easy. Shit happens.
Why would you be laughed at and ridiculed for identifying and fixing an error and quickly replacing problematic devices? It seems quite professional to me, no matter how often people call it a beta test.
Before S&B portables were launched MiniVAP already hit the stores but it’s quite significant that it was made by an engineer who worked for S&B before.
No bullying intended, just discussion about the issue, which I feel is pretty relevant. We should strive for vape companies to be as competent and thorough in their initial testing and development of a device, as they are in response to an issue like this.@Jojofernz @WirtDog sorry guys I’m just being very sensitive about this when it seems to be going in circles and I guess to me it just comes on like bullying and not knowing when to stop
Appreciated. The MiniVap is fair to point out. Please don't take my ramblings as anything more than that. I even forgot about log vapes. The Eterra predated the Volcano by a year or two and I think the Aromazap was sometime post 2000. I only have experience with logs post 2015 so I'm not sure how the older models would measure up. Given other similar styles of devices from around that time, I'd guess that you can still make a case for S&B innovation despite my Swiss cheese memory.Great post.
Before S&B portables were launched MiniVAP already hit the stores but it’s quite significant that it was made by an engineer who worked for S&B before.
Why bashing a 170 employees company like if it was Mc Donald’s? They identified an issue, made it possible to remotely switch off affected units without having the need of shipping units back. Funny thing is that the people who complained the most don’t even have the vaporizer.
That's fair. I haven't tried any of the Airvape line, but if that's the case, then yeah, the Venty isn't quite as unique in that regard. The TM2 and FF2 generally aren't regarded as session vapes though so if you're not going to make that distinction, it's definitely nothing new. RBT, Lamart, along with a bunch of other devices have been able to clear even larger amounts in shorter periods of time.for quite a while now.I have nothing against the Venty or S&B. I don't own any of their vapes but I can see that many on the forum stand by them for their reliability and efficiency.
I don't think the paragraph above though is completely valid. I own an AVLP that can clear 0.25g in under 2min including heat-up time while using it natively and it pre-dated the Venty. I don't own the TM2, or Roffu either but from what I've read they're also both capable of this just off the top of my head, probably even the FF2 can do this so I don't think it's "pretty unique".
Adding 2x18650s gives it impressive battery life (not innovation per se) but I would say only when you add the adaptive heating via flow control, user flow control and massive 130W power ceiling, then yes I would say all these things are new and pretty unique. Of course there are always tradeoffs for performance and I guess the Venty's increased size compared to other portables is one of them.
How many more resources/employees does your Apple's and Tesla's of the world have compared to S&B though.I think y’all might really be judging vapes on a curve that you’re not applying to other manufacturers. If Apple recalled the entire initial batch of their new flagship iPhone, or Tesla recalled the entirety of a new model release, I think we’d have a lot more folks thinking “wtf, how did they not catch this in testing??” than there would be thinking “what a professionally run company that’s handling this recall so responsibly!!”.
How many more resources/employees does your Apple's and Tesla's of the world have compared to S&B though.
Yeah, they've always taken care of me in the past so no worries here. Almost sounds like the thousands he says they made during development were tested in an automated setup (with too narrow test conditions/parameters) and the issue only became obvious with broader real world usage. I would imagine they kept human testing before the launch as narrow as they could to avoid leaks to the press.Jürgen is rockin' espanol, from his engineering gig in Peru?
Jürgen Bickel on Instagram: "The nature of serial product development: challenges and how to overcome them. Muchas gracias @grecia.adaro #productdevelopment #storzandbickel"
432 likes, 84 comments - jurgen_bickel on November 13, 2023: "The nature of serial product development: challenges and how to overcome them. Muchas gracias @grecia.adaro #productdevelopment #storzandbickel".www.instagram.com
Sounds like he is determined to make things right (because they failed to "make things right" the first time). I still have faith
Pretty sure I've read somewhere that companies attached to a family name e.g. Bickel in this case but could be Heinz or Campbell or Ferrari, generally provide more consumer satisfaction and are more successful compared to an arbitrary company name like Microsoft. No small wonder I suppose since Jürgen doesn't seem eager to have his name attached to some sort of scandal. He seems to be doing and saying the right things.Jürgen is rockin' espanol, from his engineering gig in Peru?
Jürgen Bickel on Instagram: "The nature of serial product development: challenges and how to overcome them. Muchas gracias @grecia.adaro #productdevelopment #storzandbickel"
432 likes, 84 comments - jurgen_bickel on November 13, 2023: "The nature of serial product development: challenges and how to overcome them. Muchas gracias @grecia.adaro #productdevelopment #storzandbickel".www.instagram.com
Sounds like he is determined to make things right (because they failed to "make things right" the first time). I still have faith
Well I'm guessing the more resources you have the more thorough testing and QC can be achieved. Seems logical to me.Quite a bit, I’d imagine? But I’m not sure how relevant that is to a recall. Would a full-model at-launch recall from Rolls Royce or Maserati be more understandable/acceptable than one from Honda or GM simply because they’re a smaller corporation?
Has, ANYONE using iPhone or iPad been able to do this online TEST, and how?
I think y’all might really be judging vapes on a curve that you’re not applying to other manufacturers. If Apple recalled the entire initial batch of their new flagship iPhone, or Tesla recalled the entirety of a new model release, I think we’d have a lot more folks thinking “wtf, how did they not catch this in testing??” than there would be thinking “what a professionally run company that’s handling this recall so responsibly!!”.
Quite a bit, I’d imagine? But I’m not sure how relevant that is to a recall. Would a full-model at-launch recall from Rolls Royce or Maserati be more understandable/acceptable than one from Honda or GM simply because they’re a smaller corporation?
They also don’t ship as many “units” as Apple and Tesla. Not even comparable. The iPhone and an EV/ICE vehicle is on another level of technicality and engineering versus a device that heats up and get you highHow many more resources/employees does your Apple's and Tesla's of the world have compared to S&B though.
Someone mentioned around 170 employees work at S&B. How many of them are testers etc.
Yeah, they've always taken care of me in the past so no worries here. Almost sounds like the thousands he says they made during development were tested in an automated setup (with too narrow test conditions/parameters) and the issue only became obvious with broader real world usage. I would imagine they kept human testing before the launch as narrow as they could to avoid leaks to the press.
Recalls happen dude, how can you presume "it was obvious.... they didn't do it properly.... this was predictable". You're out here with your mind made up regardless of the truth, unless we get a retrospective from S&B directly with a full breakdown of the problem you're only out here with bad faith takes.Everyone earlier in the thread bought out all these possible but unlikely scenarios about why this wasn't picked up in testing. Yet it was the obvious, they didn't do it properly. This wasn't unlucky, this was predictable. NDAs exist when you want to avoid leaks.
I think they are just big name catch alls. S&B scales over 15x the size of say Grasshopper LLC who were berated by professional reviewers despite delivering the most innovative product in this space to date as a bunch of borderline drop outs. It would certainly have been a different story if any money was there to pay them them off... or if they handled themselves better over the course of time. It's not easy, you can't win with faulty parts in inventory.How many more resources/employees does your Apple's and Tesla's of the world have compared to S&B though.
I remember the Orion ih from which I had to destroy it, sent a picture and got a new one.Pretty sure I've read somewhere that companies attached to a family name e.g. Bickel in this case but could be Heinz or Campbell or Ferrari, generally provide more consumer satisfaction and are more successful compared to an arbitrary company name like Microsoft. No small wonder I suppose since Jürgen doesn't seem eager to have his name attached to some sort of scandal. He seems to be doing and saying the right things.
I will say I've never seen a situation where a company asked the consumer to assume the responsibility of de-activating and ultimately disposing of a unit. Any product really, not just a vape .... not sure I can think of a time this happened to me. But I guess you can't just ship a (potentially) dangerous product through the mail back to the manufacturer.
In closing, I was hooked on the video in the first 2 seconds. Grecia is a hottie! Much respect Jürgen
As I have just woken up, I figured I would do a quick Google on car manufacturers recalls, as this is the comparison you have decided to go with. I'll only put a couple of links up because I don't wanna bore people to much.Sure, but companies don’t scale “how much testing is needed” to reflect how many employees they have, they scale testing to reflect how much testing is needed so that this particular kind of event doesn’t happen (and clearly, that didn’t happen here).
I'm not presuming, I'm basing it on what they've said. They literally said they tried to automate all the testing.Recalls happen dude, how can you presume "it was obvious.... they didn't do it properly.... this was predictable". You're out here with your mind made up regardless of the truth, unless we get a retrospective from S&B directly with a full breakdown of the problem you're only out here with bad faith takes.
they automated the testing for all their devices, which never was a problem (Sauce: Factory tour) So it wasn’t predictable at all, since it worked fine so farI'm not presuming, I'm basing it on what they've said. They literally said they tried to automate all the testing.
Testing can't be automated because it's a sapient activity, only checking can be automated, and they also admitted their automated checks were based on too narrow parameters. So based on that, I think we can say this was predictable.
Sure they've done the right thing now, but it could've been avoided
I got this, though I had radio silence for a full week before I chased and was told it was out of stock. The refund as well, didn't hear for 4-5 days and chased that up, was in my bank next day.Did anyone else get the email a couple of weeks back informing you that they are out of stock, and that you could either wait it out, or request a refund? I decided to request the refund, but havent seen it yet, nor have I had any response from S&B other than an email asking me to run the test to determine if my yet to be delivered Venty needed to be bricked or not.
I asked but they just gave the same copypasta answer. Saftey issue + energy management has to be a battery thermal runaway risk though. That could be triggered by over-charging, charging too fast, or shorting (nothing else really).Do we know what the exact problem is yet? Something more specific than “energy management”?