I have to watch how this plays out in this thread. Having never used a water tool, I'm even more ignorant than usual. Having said that, of all my current devices, the VM (to me) is the LEAST likely device to require water augmentation. What is it that I'm missing?
Vapor is super dry; this and your airways/mouth/throat do not agree with one another!
There is a constant trade off with vaping between short airpaths (with minimal surface area upon which actives can recondense as it passes through, but the resultant vapor is definitely hotter, drier and harsher - the vapman for example has one of the shortest vapor paths I know of!) and long airpaths (more surface area, more condensation of actives, less harsh) and water paths (much less dryness/harshness of vapor, much smoother and allows for much bigger hits, however obviously will facilitate more condensation still than a long vapor path).
I find that for super clean concentrates (I don't really have much time for flowers these days lol), a water pipe with a short vapor path is best for the balancing act between smoothness of hits and minimizing condensation of actives before they get into your airways.
However, for flowers/less clean concentrates/hashes, there is a lot more in terms of particulates in the aerosol you are inhaling. This necessarily changes the game and necessitates bigger pieces with more diffusion. I still find my Luke Wilson 15 arm tree ideal for large hits off bud and non-full melt hashes.
Obviously, this is much more generally applicable and not purely limited to the vapman, but I hope this helps to outline the basics of considerations in choosing your airpath/water path.
Nice scuff (kief)
@natural farmer the vapegg makes a great mini sifter, fill the top put in put in a ball bearing and screen between, into the freezer for two hrs then shake
"Don't eat the box to taste the pizza"
Bro, that is some great DIY tech and great to see you embracing the concentrate philosophy of less filler, more killer!
Out of interest, what kind of screen do you use for this? Is the resultant sift melty at all?