greystr0ke said:
OC513 said:
wait a minute I thought I have read this whole thread from back when it started......so did I miss Luke Wilson HydraTree's being brought to the table?
Seriously! Where did these bad boys come from?
Greystroke, OC513 - Preston from StoneGlassWorks uses Luke Wilson trees in his tubes. He was nice enough to procure a bunch of them for me to put into future HydraTrees. The tubes were put together by TAFKAGM, similar in the way Sovereignty built us his trees for us to assemble into the HydraTubes.
arf777 said:
Like a lot of folks, I cannot wait to get my hands on one of these.
What is the efficiency like? Is it comparable to the PD? I've seen claims that the Life Saber is close to the PD, if they are I'd guess yours will be as well.
One thing though - THC IS water soluble. Check the work from the cannabinoid lab at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Also chemfinder has the solubility datal. It is a relatively recent discovery, but it came out of the same lab that discovered THC in the first place. Not hugely soluble though - the rate is around .25 or .3g/100mL.
Efficiency is very hard thing to quantify. While the log vapes seem more efficient than other vapes given the amount that you use versus the intensity of the high, I do not know if they are actually more efficient at extracting THC from the plant. The log vapes force you to take very slow, methodical inhales. As we all know, the amount of time the vapor sits in your lungs does affect the intensity of the high. Many big hitters allow you to quickly inhale large amounts of vapor and if you exhale quickly, you won't be as high as someone who holds that hit in for 20+ seconds. The log vapes essentially force you to keep the vapor in your lungs longer due to the slow nature of the draw. If you could discipline yourself on a big hitter to take a slow hit that was maybe 20 seconds long, I am confident that you will feel a similar high given the amount of herb you use compared to a log vape.
Another reason I believe log vapes to be more "efficient" is due to their narrow bowl. The narrow bowl forces the hot air to pass thru all the herb without any hotspots. A lot of the heavy hitting vapes have wider/bigger bowls and when the hot air passes thru, you tend to get a hot spot in the middle so the plant material isn't cooked evenly. If it isn't evenly cooked, then you aren't getting all the vapor out of that bowl without stirring the bowl first.
We resolved this within the Cloud to try and give you the best of both worlds. Let's face it, if you turn up the heat on any vaporizer and take slow inhales, you will get massive clouds. The trick is, how do you get massive clouds without scorching your herb with high intensity heat? This is where I believe experienced vaporists will see the biggest improvement when using the Cloud.
Also, thank you for the heads up that THC is indeed water soluble. I am happy to see that it is a recent study otherwise I would have thought my memory was playing tricks on me. Based on the .3g/100ml ratio, I am still comfortable saying that the THC loss will still be negligible - but for those that love dry vapor, more power to ya!