The Yugo analogy doesn't work because this isn't the cheapest vape on the market. Most times you get what you pay for, and no one bought the Yugo because it was the best car on the market. The Cloud is the "Bentley" (my words) of vaporizers. When you place yourself in the premium market, you are expected to deliver premium goods and service. While I admit that the VXC team seems friendly and victims of unethical business practices, to the consumer thats out almost $600 this matters very little. The consumer didn't choose their manufacturing partner, but the consumer did give them their money.
I was going to take the path of just demanding my money back, but after talking to the VXL and the vendor, and listening to different members on here, I certainly feel sympathetic to their situation. It's a small company and giving back everyone's money or recalling all units in the field is probably not logistically possible. Plus, its in my best interest for them to succeed or else I just threw out ~$600. However, it would be nice if there was more communication on whats going on. I'd consider buying another one but without knowing if I'm buying a unit that currently has a 30% chance of failing or an 80% chance, I think the saying goes "fool me once..."
I don't know if all of the Cloud+ units are defective, or how long they are going to last, but it would be nice to know if VXL could give us a failure rate, or even an explanation on whats failing. I haven't seen any international units fail yet, so maybe its a power supply issue. I sent them an email asking of any additional info and if I'm supposed to be doing anything with my broken unit (like send it in). It was sent a week ago and I haven't received a response yet. I understand it might take some time to get back to people, but since they are working around the clock, responding to concerned customers should be part of it. Are they fixing units? Building new ones? Perception is someone else's reality and minus the one response I received from VXL acknowledging my defective unit, the only thing I've seen from them is a promotional event, which seems odd considering the situation.
Hindsight is 20-20, and with my experience so far, I would've held on to my money. Once VXL gets this behind them, I'd be more than happy to buy the Cloud, as my short time with it was a great experience. But currently, I'm at the mercy of VXL to fix my unit and it's important for others to know the situation because the consumer is powerless. If stating my experience is slander than the apologists are nothing more than company shills. How many of these apologists have a defective unit collecting dust right now? Also, I hate to be negative, but the realist in me has to consider the possibility of the company failing. If that were to happen, which one of the apologists is going to refund my money?
Pakalolo, you inspected some units and they were functional? My unit was functional for a week before it went tango uniform. It appears mine isn't the only Cloud+ that died in this fashion, so I'm curious how your assessment has bearing on the reliability of the Cloud+ customers. IMO it's akin to someone kicking the tires on new car and telling you the car was going to work fine. When my unit failed, I found out about the production issues, and assumed they knowingly sold me a defective unit. After explaining that to my vendor and VXL, I was assured that they inspected every unit still available, and the scope of the problem was worse than initially assumed. So IMO the issue isn't being detected with the current inspections. If your goal is to put consumers at ease with your inspection of a few Clouds, what are your credentials in electronics and your familiarity with the Cloud+. Please explain to me how a visual inspection (hopefully the unit was opened up for this inspection) is going to identify a problem in a unit that is functional, but is going to fail (for unknown reasons) after a few hours use? If sirurdnotwrex is saying all Cloud+'s are going to fail, that basis is unfounded. But if his "false warning" (your words) is inaccurate based on his personal experience, how are you not engaging in the same conduct by giving "false hope" (my words) based on your inspection of a few units.
VXL should have their failure rate data as warranty work is an expense, and any company that wants to stay a company should be keeping track of that cost. IMO if the number of failed units is as small as some think it is, and the units still out there are functional, then why not recall/buyback some of the good units (to replace or cannibalize for parts) still in vendor stock to square up the current crop of customers that are stuck with defective units.
Sorry for the rant, as I've tried to keep mum about everything, but when I see accusations of slander, it's going to get a response.