Fixed. I'm sure everyone that viewed the elb and mistook it for glass will be better informed now.
Based on many of the reactions, I thought I should come back and clarify my previous post. Forgive me, my forum-fu is a bit rusty.
I want to see VapeXhale succeed & succeed
famously. I've met, worked and broken bread & bud with StoneMonkey & crew. I
like these guys! I only have/carry/offer/recommend two (plug-in) vaporizers. The Cloud is one of them. It is an excellent concept imho.
Where I seem to have a philosophical difference with some members/mods here is on the value of
constructive criticism. I think those who are dismissing concerns are actually doing a disservice to VapeXhale. This thread can (& has) provided an open-source, free QA + R&D forum. I can only guess at the diverse backgrounds and personal experiences/perspectives of all the members here. Ideas are great (& "lossless") to share. Already ideas that have germinated here (e.g. wrist/heat-bands) have made it into production. What a valuable resource! And if any idea has no merit it is easily disregarded. I suspect SM & crew want to create the best (within cost-constraints, of course) vaporizer possible. It is to that end I was posting.
Time is a truly nonrenewable resource, & I unfortunately do not have much available atm, but I want to, quickly, clarify the couple of observations I made.
"The VapeXhale Cloud is the only vaporizer with an All Glass Vapor Path." I don't believe this statement is accurate. The ELB is part of the vapor path and, as others have posted, there are other glass-path vapes. Being clear & 100% truthful/concise is always the best policy (imho). How big of a deal is the 1.8g metal ELB? That is up to personal discretion. For me, I'm not worried about the metal going reactive (would require extreme heat) but metal is heat-accumulative & I think it would be awesome if there was some sort of glass ELB solution. There were a few vids earlier this thread with combustion happening... one with a cherry glowing inside an ELB. I
suspect this would be less likely to occur w/o the metal. My personal peeve is concentrates gumming up the works so quickly.
Breakage of the Bamboo, no matter what reason, is not covered by warranty. This is a bit of an Achilles heel imho, as I recently experienced. I can sympathize 100% with VXL's policy. I guess it could be impossible to prove the difference between an internal defect and user-error breakage. That is why I was surprised to see that the internals of the bamboo were constructed of such thin glass. I'm unsure of the thermal stress caused both by rapid heat up and delta-T° (difference in temp) along the bamboo, but I suspect it could be quite significant. Then there is the torsional and other physical stresses on it via normal use. My idea (again, fwiw) would be to beef-up that bamboo, big time! More glass = more strength, & perhaps heat retention as well? I wouldn't imagine that adding much expense. As it is I'm unsure how much of a liability it is. I witnessed it first-hand myself, but have limited experience (which is why I asked if any one else has similar experience, previous post).
I'll add a quick note on Quality Control. Looking at the last several images posted (dings, scratches, malformed metal casings, backwards heat-shields). Whoa - I would suggest this is
not an image the producer of any product would want to put forward.
I've a few other ideas for "Cloud 2.0" (lol) & have read some good ones here as well, but will leave it for now (before I really wear out my welcome, lol!).
Cheers,
Nebu