If I thought i was capable I would, i just remember you saying remind me if i havent brought it up...thanks for getting things goin
So its bad to store in the charger - oh no Mister BillThe general advice is to store them at 'half to 2/3 charge' so 3.6 is fine, a bit higher might be a little better?
You want to avoid fully charged or deeply discharged.
OF
Charging rate, btw, is how much current (amps) you put into the battery. This determines how long it takes to charge the battery. More current, less time it takes. You're not dealing with the charge rate here, just the voltage left in the battery after you charge (or discharge) it.Just a quick question: What was the best charging rate for CGR18650CH and NCR18650PD batteries to store them for longer time again? (OF/Haywood)
Bad in the sense that if your chargerSo its bad to store in the charger - oh no Mister Bill
If you don't have an easy way to measure the voltage, what I recommend is that you take note how long it takes to charge a battery to full from a known depleted state, and then just charge it for half that time before putting it into storage. Or fully charge a battery and use it in your Cera for half the time it normally lasts.
You don't have to be super accurate here, you just don't want the battery to be mostly full or mostly empty. It won't make any difference if you store the battery at 3.5 volts or 3.7 volts.
Charging rate, btw, is how much current (amps) you put into the battery. This determines how long it takes to charge the battery. More current, less time it takes. You're not dealing with the charge rate here, just the voltage left in the battery after you charge (or discharge) it.
Anywhere between 3.5 and 3.7 volts is fine for long term storage. You have to measure the voltage of the battery when it's NOT in the charger. Take it out of the charger and let it settle for five minutes and then measure the voltage. Or use it in your Cera for five or ten minutes after fully charging it, take it out, let it rest a few minutes, and read the voltage. The voltage will go up when it's in the charger, and down when it's being used in your Cera. When the voltage reads 3.6V, put the battery away for storage.
If you don't have an easy way to measure the voltage, what I recommend is that you take note how long it takes to charge a battery to full from a known depleted state, and then just charge it for half that time before putting it into storage. Or fully charge a battery and use it in your Cera for half the time it normally lasts.
You don't have to be super accurate here, you just don't want the battery to be mostly full or mostly empty. It won't make any difference if you store the battery at 3.5 volts or 3.7 volts.
Bad in the sense that if your chargerscrews upmalfunctions you could blow up a battery while you're sleeping in the next room, or worse, be out of your home when it burns down. If the charger doesn't malfunction, it will stop putting any current into the battery once it's charged, it won't draw current from the battery, and it won't start charging again until the battery drops down to below 3.9V (it's at 4.1V-4.2V once it's charged and still sitting in the charger).
I try very hard not to leave charging batteries unattended, and I NEVER leave my apartment when there are batteries charging.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, we're talking about LONG TERM storage here, not a couple of days or a week. If you're storing a battery for a month or longer, then it makes sense to store it at ~3.6V or so. A week or so storage at full charge won't really do any significant damage. (Avoid leaving your batteries discharged much below 3.2V for any length of time though).
The black rubber band around the mouth piece on the CEO keeps getting pieces torn off every time I put it back in. Is this normal? I don't want anything to fall into the chamber.
I was thinking the same thing recently and just never got around to posting it. I really dont get it either but it sure does make the LL cart worth purchasing.TET charges basically $50 just for the ceramic mouthpiece and another $40 for the top cap, thats $90 just to add them to my order.
If I were to just buy the LL cart for $100 it already comes wit both of those as well as the LL cart. This is saying that the LL cart itself is only worth $10??? How is this at all possible. I feel in this aspect alone TET needs a serious pricing adjustment on some things.
I am not hating here, I have very much respect for TET and all the work they have done, but this alone has turned me off ordering until something changes
Some people like it, while others like the more restricted draw of the smoothflow. Its all personal preference.does it make sense to use the thermal cap from the CLL with the CEO? also, i wanted to order the smooth flow, but shipping is $10!
Well the whole point of the ceramic top is its filtration and cooling properties. Also the fact of why they aren't including it anymore and the pricing structure.In my opinion (have both the EO and LL) the ceramic top isn't that useful on the EO cart. 1st the cart gets so hot and the heat is transfered to the ceramic easily. I like the thermo buffer of the white tip much more... Don't waste you money on it really.
Hence the soft insulator top. I see little effect filtration from the top - not sure what you mean. There us nothing there, but small holes for the vape to pass through, maybe some cooling. The water vapor top is much better.Well the whole point of the ceramic top is its filtration and cooling properties. Also the fact of why they aren't including it anymore and the pricing structure.
There is no way the ceramic cap and top costs 9 times as much as the loose leaf core does. The LL core is made of the same stuff and is hand made.
The ceramic top cap and mouthpiece cost $90 by themselves, yet if you buy just the LL core(no body) it comes with them. So by that pricing structure the LL core only really costs $10. Not possible.
Edit: Plus you are forgetting the fact that with the EO core heat only needs to be on for 30 seconds or so as opposed to minutes at a time with the LL core. The cap is going to get way hotter when using the LL core than with the EO.
Hence the soft insulator top. I see little effect filtration from the top - not sure what you mean. There us nothing there, but small holes for the vape to pass through, maybe some cooling. The water vapor top is much better.
Not sure how the ceramic top mates with a water pipe...
I find it 1000% better to use the EO and O rings into a slightly enlarged 18mm female. It is perfect. And that is how its used 99% of the time for me. Not sure how the EO would be better for me.
? The EO is not ceramic like the LL its either SS or TI...
Not sure how the ceramic top mates with a water pipe...
I find it 1000% better to use the EO and O rings into a slightly enlarged 18mm female. It is perfect. And that is how its used 99% of the time for me. Not sure how the EO would be better for me.
I have not bought a single pen style vape I have not improved somehow so I'm OK with it to a point, but I understand your point on cost and teh change. More principal I guess, but in the end the EO is the best cart in my box and I own probably 20 different types.
On the soft top - yes that's my point. Its used partly to insulate the heat from the top.
I doubt the temperature gets anywhere near 446F near the mouthpiece.I understand that the outside of the EO cart is metal, trust me. I defer you to read this post between Tim and myself in the original thread
http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/t...sed-because-of-chaos.7504/page-20#post-298793
I specifically asked him how the Cera EO could have an all ceramic vapor path even though the core is made of either ss or ti. So I have already been assured by Tim that even though there is metal in the "air path" there isn't any in the "vapor path"
Edit: now with using a delrin tip instead of the original ceramic tip there will be plastic sitting directly in the core. Delrin offgases formaldehyde at around 446F(give or take a little depending on which exact one is used), so again using the now included delrin tip makes the device no longer medical grade in my opinion and a medical standpoint.