TA og owner very happy! same set on the way. Thank you @phattpiggieExcited to have joined the hype train, Smooth Adjusta Flo with magsink on the way! All aboard!
TA og owner very happy! same set on the way. Thank you @phattpiggieExcited to have joined the hype train, Smooth Adjusta Flo with magsink on the way! All aboard!
Thanks for the reply . Now to decide on TA1 or TA3. Not sure how essential is the variable airflow on such a stem or if the larger heater is necessaryYes, an XL hula stem is perfeclty acceptable. IIRC I saw a picture taken by @Chicken No Name with this very stem, but I could be wrong.
The stem I ended up using has probably even less cooling that an XL hula stem so I'm positive they will do the job just fine.
ETA: I've just looked up and what @Chicken No Name was using in his post wasn't a hula stem but another glass stem. Sorry for the confusion.
My point still stands though. You should be able to use the TA with any stem you want. I'd only avoid metal stems.
Have the same set plus screens and o-rings. Super excited! Looking forward to trying out PP work. Been eyeing this for a bit.Excited to have joined the hype train, Smooth Adjusta Flo with magsink on the way! All aboard!
Personally, I'd think that if the small extra cost isn't an issue, then having the airflow adjusta can only be an advantage at best, and no disadvantage at worse. Also, it has a slightly higher flow rate than the TA1, with the vents full open, so a small additional factor in choosing.Thanks for the reply . Now to decide on TA1 or TA3. Not sure how essential is the variable airflow on such a stem or if the larger heater is necessary
Yes, you are probably right. My thinking with TA1 was there are no moving parts to fail and the simplicity of the set up. It was my understanding that the airflow between TA1 and TA3 (fully open) were comparable. I guess it depends on how open TA1 is on simple stem with no airflow adjustment. Is it a DTL setup or more MTL, which I believe version 1 was? (I read someone comparing it to sucking a milkshake through a straw).Personally, I'd think that if the small extra cost isn't an issue, then having the airflow adjusta can only be an advantage at best, and no disadvantage at worse. Also, it has a slightly higher flow rate than the TA1, with the vents full open, so a small additional factor in choosing.
Sorry, regards the DTL/MTL set up I'm no more experienced than yourself - never tried a beta.Yes, you are probably right. My thinking with TA1 was there are no moving parts to fail and the simplicity of the set up. It was my understanding that the airflow between TA1 and TA3 (fully open) were comparable. I guess it depends on how open TA1 is on simple stem with no airflow adjustment. Is it a DTL setup or more MTL, which I believe version 1 was? (I read someone comparing it to sucking a milkshake through a straw).
Instead of heating the top 3rd I'm heating the top half of the heater.
this!I think the airflow vents can be screwed down so they don't easily move, if desired, so it can be almost the same as the TA1, and I think the vent mechanism is simply enough to be reliable.
The restriction level is difficult to gauge because it depends on personal preferences and what devices you are comparing.Is it a DTL setup or more MTL, which I believe version 1 was? (I read someone comparing it to sucking a milkshake through a straw).
Yes, with the TA3 (and I assume it'll be the same with the TA4) it's better to heat lower, I'd say halfway through the narrow part of the heater. But the timings are still spot on.Am I right in assuming that, apart from the different positioning of the lighter (heating the top half of the heater instead of heating the top 3rd), the following instructions still apply for using the new TA?
The restriction level is difficult to gauge because it depends on personal preferences and what devices you are comparing.
The TA can be used both for MTL and DTL hits. I think @phattpiggie's idea was more oriented towards MTL, but you can easily take a huge single hit no problem. After more than a year of heavy use, I'm still unsure which style I like the most. So yeah, pretty versatile.
Yes, with the TA3 (and I assume it'll be the same with the TA4) it's better to heat lower, I'd say halfway through the narrow part of the heater. But the timings are still spot on.
Thanks. When you say can be both a MTL and DTL do you mean if you have a stem with adjustable airflow? I will reach out to Phatpiggie as he is probably better placed to advise especially as this is a new version.The restriction level is difficult to gauge because it depends on personal preferences and what devices you are comparing.
The TA can be used both for MTL and DTL hits. I think @phattpiggie's idea was more oriented towards MTL, but you can easily take a huge single hit no problem. After more than a year of heavy use, I'm still unsure which style I like the most. So yeah, pretty versatile.
Yes, with the TA3 (and I assume it'll be the same with the TA4) it's better to heat lower, I'd say halfway through the narrow part of the heater. But the timings are still spot on.
No. I tend to use the same stem for both MTL and DTL hits. It's the first in the image I posted a few pages back (https://fuckcombustion.com/threads/thermal-accumulator-by-phattpiggie.52933/post-1779243)When you say can be both a MTL and DTL do you mean if you have a stem with adjustable airflow?
Fwiw, I bought a PP stem with mine (always wanted one!) and was saved by @VGOODIEZ who suggested I replace it with one of the finned models if I intended to use it with the TA. I wonder if @DynaBox would/could make an add-on radiator?Actually, on this question of stem cooling etc.
I've seen photos of some TA (betas) on a stem, but appear to have some sort of round radiator fins between the bowl and the stem, like a set of washers welded on a short tube and spaced apart by a mm or two - but engineered from a solid block.
I can't say if they are part of the stem or something else, but does anyone know of a radiator device that can sit between the stem and the bowl fitting, without extending the stem length by more than about an inch (give or take) that can shed an extra few calories of heat before the vapour even hits the stem?
TIA.
(if only I had a decent lathe! )
Quick thought: 510 heatsinks? Might take some o-rings and a bit of grinding (as they are supposed to have 8,5mm connectors), but they are really cheap. Might be worth a try.Actually, on this question of stem cooling etc.
I've seen photos of some TA (betas) on a stem, but appear to have some sort of round radiator fins between the bowl and the stem, like a set of washers welded on a short tube and spaced apart by a mm or two - but engineered from a solid block.
I can't say if they are part of the stem or something else, but does anyone know of a radiator device that can sit between the stem and the bowl fitting, without extending the stem length by more than about an inch (give or take) that can shed an extra few calories of heat before the vapour even hits the stem?
TIA.
(if only I had a decent lathe! )
Ah, interesting, you wouldn't be able to post a piccie would you? (if it's not a pain)
Ah, not familiar with these, got a link to somewhere just so I find the one you mean? (I don't know if there are different types?)Quick thought: 510 heatsinks? Might take some o-rings and a bit of grinding (as they are supposed to have 8,5mm connectors), but they are really cheap. Might be worth a try.
Unfortunately it's still on its way but these were those I ordered with the finned one the replacement:Ah, interesting, you wouldn't be able to post a piccie would you? (if it's not a pain)
Ah, not familiar with these, got a link to somewhere just so I find the one you mean? (I don't know if there are different types?)
Thanks both!
I was thinking of those: amazon.de or aliexpress to give you the idea... Sizewise all 510 connectors should have a diameter of ~8,5mm.Ah, not familiar with these, got a link to somewhere just so I find the one you mean? (I don't know if there are different types?)
Thanks for the reply . Now to decide on TA1 or TA3. Not sure how essential is the variable airflow on such a stem or if the larger heater is necessary
Yes, you are probably right. My thinking with TA1 was there are no moving parts to fail and the simplicity of the set up. It was my understanding that the airflow between TA1 and TA3 (fully open) were comparable. I guess it depends on how open TA1 is on simple stem with no airflow adjustment. Is it a DTL setup or more MTL, which I believe version 1 was? (I read someone comparing it to sucking a milkshake through a straw).
Ah! Yes! that was exactly the sort of thing I was thinking of - re: the radiator fins! Thanks!Unfortunately it's still on its way but these were those I ordered with the finned one the replacement:
I see someone snatched the Bamboo one already--that thing is amazing!
Oh, I see, yes, now I know what you mean. That's a nice option to play with, cheap enough not to care if it doesn't work!I was thinking of those: amazon.de or aliexpress to give you the idea... Sizewise all 510 connectors should have a diameter of ~8,5mm.
I think, (therefore I yam?) , that the effects of friction, gas flow, and related, make the five holes of the TA1 more likely to have lower flow compared to the two holes of the adjustables, compared by the area of the open holes. i.e. the five hole device will have more length of hole-edge that causes higher flow reduction. The most unrestricted opening for a set area of hole, would be a single circular hole near centre of the top cap of the heater.And it was me that mentioned milkshake when describing the OG airflow, you can still do a deep inhale hit, but puffing just works really well instead... The restriction through water was a bit inconvenient for most of my preferred water pieces I guess? I was mostly using it to puff on a sherlock hook (it has one small hole in the center on the top so yeah having seven larger holes or two wide open slots that are adjustable should be a big improvement though some people like the restriction to control the extraction easier with less mindful effort I think)
Splitting hairs you are indeed!I think, (therefore I yam?) , that the effects of friction, gas flow, and related, make the five holes of the TA1 more likely to have lower flow compared to the two holes of the adjustables, compared by the area of the open holes. i.e. the five hole device will have more length of hole-edge that causes higher flow reduction. The most unrestricted opening for a set area of hole, would be a single circular hole near centre of the top cap of the heater.
That's just from the physics of it, what the actual areas of 'hole' there are for the different TA's, I ain't got a clue! The thickness of the cap will effect this too.
(not to mention the impact on flow from passage through the heater and stem that back-propagates to the airholes from inside).
Oh, I absolutely agree! You should see my split ends! Dreadful!Splitting hairs you are indeed!
I went with the TA2 even though the TA3 supposedly had more airflow. I cared a little more about the size of the head and figured the difference in airflow between TA2 and TA3 were negligible. Plus, the additional balls will offset the additional airflow given by the cap openig. The tempest wide open has slits that are way smaller then either of the ones I mentioned and I have no airflow issues with the tempest
Why is that an advantage? And is it sufficiently desirable to wait for it?My own take was it's a TA3 with a threaded top cap, so your bottom doesn't have to be removed to change ya balls.