Hi TreeCityRnd,
treecityrnd said:
... any vapor that you exhale is not absorbed (i.e., not biologically available) and thus contains "wasted active cannabinoids". ... It is simply a matter of physiology; {beyond a certain limit} your body cannot absorb all the vapor. A perfect analogy would be eating. Your body can only absorb so many calories per hour. That which is absorbed is available for your body to use.
Agreed -- and very well stated! We have been posting similar observations ourselves, and it is nice to see them collaborated. With the Box design, we have endeavored to match the bodies natural adsorption rate with an appropriate vapor emission rate. Unfortunately, this means 'no visible vapor' -- and so people think that the Box is "not working" when it is actually performing perfectly.
The main trick is to breathe deep -- as deeply as possible. A breath that is only a little deeper will be far more psychologically effective than a breath that is held loosely, even if it is held a very long time!
treecityrnd said:
... I love FC! Its one of the best sources of public education online.
Agreed. Which is why a public reference an article that requires a pay per view feels like an advertisement: "We have the information you want, and it costs only $20". There are a number of people on this forum who are cost conscious, and to them, being able to read only an abstract is to have effectively received only a summary of an opinion of "what did this study mean" rather than to have received any real substantiated support for the ideas expressed. For a claim to be
openly supported, it must reference
public information. Unfortunately, anything that requires payment for access is fundamentally private, and therefore not really 'citeable' at all.
treecityrnd said:
... We wanted to determine the physiological and subjective effects of inhaled marijuana ... in normal subjects across several inhalation-related variables. ...
Unfortunately, insofar as X entity (PubMed) requires payment for access to a resource Y, then X asserts ownership of that resource (and that therefore resource Y is private). I am hoping from your comment that you are the actual 'owner' of the document and that you might be able to provide an open link to it for the general membership of this Forum? Pretty please?
treecityrnd said:
This is the MFLB forum, sorry for straying so far off topic.
Actually, this is right on topic: How to use the Box most effectively! Hence my interest in ensuring the widest possible access to your work.
I am also hoping you might know of some research that supports one of our other contentions: that the "milkyness" of a hit is actually an indicator of changing hit chemistry -- and not necessarily for the better. Are you aware of any studies which characterize the relative changes in the percentages of various vapor constituents as a function of temperature?
-- Magic-Flight