pakalolo said:Bah! Neither my wife nor I use nail polish.
So much better? Powerex (MAHA) is an excellent brand and the prices are pretty good. The "stock batteries" are also Powerex. They're just the low discharge Imedions. The regular 2700mAh bats last a little longer, fully charged, but the low discharge type Imedions hold their charge a lot better over time, while they're sitting around, waiting to be used.Blackthoven said:clayton said:After doing some serious lurking it looks like I need to upgrade the stock batteries and get this.
http://www.thomasdistributing.com/shop/ m238t2rg42
I'm fine with the stock batteries, but if these are "that" much better then I guess I'll pay up.
What is it that's so much better about these batteries?
upriver said:Thanks for all the replies and thanks for the link to the vaporwiki, that is fantastic and just what I needed. Now my remaining questions:
1) What is the "cycle" program on the c9000 good for?
2) What readings will indicate a bad battery? I suppose the proof is in the vape, aka not getting hot enough. But if I have a battery that doesn't heat the LB properly, and yet reads ~2000 mah and 1.6v, should I be running the "break in" program, or is it just not up to snuff and should be relegated to other uses? 2000mah should be adequate from the wiki article, but the box just won't heat up and the light looks a little dim.
3) Is there a reason it would be a bad idea to use the c9000 for conditioning/charging and then storing them in the included MFLB charger to keep them on "standby" while the c9000 is working on other batteries?
mintberrycrunch said:I just got a launch box and this thing is a joke. It doesn't produce vapors. Invisible vapors? Lol i've seen vaporizers produce vapors.
mintberrycrunch said:How is that trolling? A negative review?
Are you guys kidding me? Invisible Vapors? You might only need to use one trench but if you take that same trench and put it in a SSV and you'll pull SO much more of it then the MFLB will ever get.
aesthyrian said:You can get any thickness of vapor you want with the MFLB. At least I can.
And yes, a DBV or SSV will be much more wasteful than a MFLB. Carry on.
mintberrycrunch said:You are only producing vapors or you're not. The SSV produces Vapors. The MFLB does not.
mintberrycrunch said:How is that trolling? A negative review?
Are you guys kidding me? Invisible Vapors? You might only need to use one trench but if you take that same trench and put it in a SSV and you'll pull SO much more of it then the MFLB will ever get.
Seriously this thing is a rip off.
mintberrycrunch said:I haven't seen an other vaporizer make the claim of "invisible vapors".
mintberrycrunch said:Dude yeah, of course there are different things people look for in a vaporizer but when a said vaporizer claims that you can use this device to vaporize then it should AT LEAST be able to do that.
I've used both the Launch Box and an Iolite. The iolite is a much better option.