Hopefully we'll soon have a unit in the hands of one of our fellow Members with an established history who can give us a 'hands on' appraisal from an objective POV.
...contemplate your behaviour here
I'm hoping we'll get objective reviews, but seeing how people feel personally involved (threatened?) just because they are early funders/backers, I'm afraid we will see some cases similar to the Stockholm syndrome, with people saying that it's not that bad just to counter the sceptics ability to say "I told you!"...
Alright so we clarified I think the battery life claim, now let's tackle the following ones:
- Doesn't require to stir when all competitors only heat the material near the bowl walls
- Blows away the competition for less than half the price
- GH is a pure convection vaporizer
- Advanced insulation keeps the mouthpiece cool, even during extended sessions
- Maximum possible efficiency, durability and battery life
PS: I had to re-read the indigogo page to fetch the claims and anyone can do the same to confirm they claimed 3 hours of continuous usage, "one of the longest lasting vaporizers available"... when some users seem to imply they just played with the words or weren't clear if it was continuous or not, for me there's absolutely no doubt that this claim was completely bogus and false advertizing.
PS2: for the last claim, it's surely true if "maximum possible" refers to what they could achieve in such a small package, now if they meant what is possible for a portable vaporizer...hmmmm again pretty bold!