It is important to read the literal letter of the diagnostic criteria above to understand that one could be a heavy daily user of cannabis and not meet the criteria for something medically diagnosable relating to their cannabis use. The diagnostic criteria each require a manifestation that causes clinically significant distress to the user.
There is a slight equivocation in the above post between depression and cannabis dependency. Are we discussing any actual case of dependency in this thread? After all, it is doubtful that you meet the criteria I shared above for a cannabis disorder. You simply do not use cannabis often enough to be likely to have a diagnosable problem or 'dependency'.
CBD is known to have activity on the serotonin receptors (5-ht1a if you're curious) as well as the mechanism I described in my last post - not just the cb2 receptor! It has a lot of promise for treating depression and a variety of bodily, psychiatric and neurological conditions. THC has been identified to have antidepressant like activity in preclinical studies. The current regulatory environment federally in the US is not accommodating for scholarly researchers to go beyond preclinical studies at this point for THC so this is the best information we will get from this portion of the worlds medical scientists until things change.
The claims I make about cannabis being known to have antidepressant effects are all from scientific journal articles, I encourage you to check out
www.scholar.google.com and search cannabis and depression to find some of this literature. Unfortunately, you won't be able to read the entire studies unless you have a subscription to scholarly journals (which means either you're a college student, academic/researcher or you spent a hell of a lot of money on it yourself!). Still, the abstracts (summaries of the aims, methods and findings of the study) are almost always visible for free so you'll be able to get a reasonable idea of what has been found so far. Do not use regular google when you are asking scientific questions! That is what Google Scholar is for
I'm not going to engage with the anecdotes above nor the rest of this discussion, since it seems you guys want to have an anecdotal conversation and I am interested in talking about the science - this is nothing negative towards you guys of course, the description of the thread confused me and it appears actually not to be a discussion for me
Man I do want to echo what
@HighSeasSailor said. You are continually both asserting and denying your own depression in this thread. You were prescribed anti-depressants which means a doctor had to think you had clinically significant depressive symptoms at least in the past. That is as clear an identification of depression as you're going to find (short of diagnosing the underlying causal condition that causes the depressive symptoms - depression is not a condition, but a symptom). Depression is a serious symptom and you speak in ways that appear to negate this symptom's validity and speak of treating depression in terms of 'crutches' which is pejorative language - likely to be offensive to a good section of the people out there with depressive illness.
Please consider the following parting message:
Medicating a genuine illness symptom like depression is not an 'escape' from life. It is quite the opposite to an 'escape'. It allows many like myself to live our lives fruitfully rather than facing constant disability, debilitation and distress. I am a hard working scientist who would not be working today if it were not for medical cannabis to treat depression and a variety of other symptoms. Your claims suggesting that cannabis is not an anti-depressant, rather an 'escape' contradicts the present scholarly literature (which is rapidly growing around the world and with legal changes hopefully will happen more in the US) but they also deny the realities of many people here who have had success using cannabis to treat depression.