florduh
Well-Known Member
As someone who passed through right libertarianism on my journey, I would point out not all of them are feudalists. Especially in principle; there’s a fairly stark divide between the idealists and the pragmatists in libertarianism generally (see Charles Johnson’s ‘Libertarianism, through thick and thin.’)
Even the most right leaning of libertarian scholars Murray Rothbard famously opined of the lunacy at declaring titled property valid. For if that is our argument surely the Lords would simply declare their land titled and at once not be not only “just” in their property, but perversely to do so in a way that honors the ‘libertarian’ complaint.
In college, I attended a talk by a Libertarian professor and author. During Q and A I asked "so when do you reckon 'private property rights' began? Can you put a date on it?" And he bumbled around with some answer about how in North America, property rights began some time after Europeans "conquered" the continent.
That's when I began to realize this philosophy is kind of arbitrary nonsense. Also describing what happened with Native Americans as "conquering", like it was some sort of epic Lord of The Rings battle between two armies to decide who owns the continent, is ridiculous. Europeans engaged in centuries of mendacity, scamming, making treaties just to almost immediately break them etc.
I call Right Wing Libertarians kneelers because they have no coherent critique of corporate power. They have no critique of oligarchy either. Yes, our governments are corrupt. But they're corrupt because they're totally bought by the wealthy and their corporations.
In a Libertarian Fantasy World where the government is small enough to drown in a bathtub, the wealthy and corporations would still use their capital to lord power over the rest of us. To maintain the hierarchy and their place in it. There would still be a court system to maintain the sanctity of contracts. It would just be "The Justice Department, Presented by Amazon".
But at the end of the day, Libertarians have no problem with the Rich having more power than the rest of us. The Just and Infallible Free Market has determined they are fit to rule. I firmly believe if Milton Friedman was alive 1500 years ago, he'd be droning on about The Divine Right of Kings, instead of "The Free Market is Magic". Maintaining unnatural hierarchies is the point of both concepts.
At least Feudal peasants kneeled because the Creator of the Universe said their Lord deserved to rule. Modern kneelers pledge themselves to whatever rich kid becomes the biggest scam artist.