TigoleBitties
Big and Bouncy
I rarely believe in removing someone's rights permanently but we still have life in prison which is a permanent removal of freedom, not to mention capital punishment (which I'm against). Again, not a fan but life in prison does seem to be necessary for some individuals. Sex offenders have rights removed or diminished... It's not unique.I strongly believe in allowing people convicted of a crime to run for office, vote, etc. What possible benefit would there be to permanently removing someone's rights permanently?
I'm not saying every felon should have their right to hold public office removed but what if they are a repeat child molester? Or a murderer? Or they've been involved in massive racketeering and bribery and fraud convictions over decades but now they've served their time. I don't know where the line is exactly but it should be there.
I said this
Certainly there might be very narrow exceptions
I never used the word vote anywhere in my first post on this so not sure why this was lumped into the removal. I think holding public office carries more weight than a single vote. You represent the people. Being a felon should bring, at the very least, a planet of scrutiny upon someone with the responsibility of running the country.At any rate, I think a felony is not reason enough to remove someone's right to run for office or vote.
Agree with this in general. Rights get taken away too often. Like abortion. Just think there needs to be a line somewhere for the highest public office in the land.Especially in a country where we choose to apply these systems against marginalized groups and people with no power.
Last edited: