Nah,
@ataxian is always chilling by the pool with a Solo and a bong. I doubt the super small size of the Fury 2 is enough of a selling point to offset the weaker battery life, slower charging, and lack of a replaceable battery.
And like I was saying: I liked the Fierce enough to give away my Solo II. So someone who has Solo love is a good Fierce candidate because they're similar. My favorite use for the Fierce is with a bubbler.
I only consume about a quarter gram a day and the Fury 2 battery still manages to sneak from two bars to empty before I get it back charging. That little vape is wonderful, don't get me wrong, but the fucking battery man... it's like someone is cycling it when I'm not here just so it'll be almost dead the next time I reach for it. Add a second battery and charger to your Fierce and you don't ever have to wait for it to be ready.
Edit: one other Fierce > Fury 2 for Ataxian thought...
Both vapes have better flavor and vapor quality with glass accessories (i.e. when not using the black mouthpiece). The glass accessories for the Fury 2 are tiny so you'd have to embrace vaping .1g or so more often to enjoy the glass difference. The Fierce glass is a bit bigger than a Solo stem and works great half full so you have the option of vaping .2g or more at a go. The extraction is admittedly slower than the Fury 2, which makes sense when you think about it. So if you wanted to just step outside, vape a bowl in two or three minutes, and be dosed and done then the Fury 2 wins. If you want better flavor and don't mind taking more time to extract then it's Fierce all day.