Cheap High Quality Bubbler

MGG

MGG

Well-Known Member
Okay i'm going to just give my 2 cents on those kind of pieces. Personally I'd rather have my flower piece seperate from my dabbing piece ESPECIALLY if i'm smoking.. in concept it's kind of neat but i think it's always nicer to have 1 rig for flowers and 1 rig for dabs..
 
blankrider

blankrider

Well-Known Member
I thought that it was 2 separate pieces in one. Like it was a Bong on the bottom and rig on the top. If it is just a piece where I can smoke and dab at the same time I think I will cut out the bullshit and just put my oil on top of nugs when I smoke.
 
MGG

MGG

Well-Known Member
blankrider said:
I thought that it was 2 separate pieces in one. Like it was a Bong on the bottom and rig on the top. If it is just a piece where I can smoke and dab at the same time I think I will cut out the bullshit and just put my oil on top of nugs when I smoke.
Click to expand...

No no you can smoke and dab separately (with a stopper in 1 of the joints)
but the thing is it isn't really 'separate' if you're smoking in it it's still going to have that after taste
which I think would ruin your dab.

So to make it simple.
When smoking it goes through bottom perc and top perc
when dabbing it just goes through top perc. (so less diffusion and smaller chamber
but you're still using the same piece that the bong smoke went through)

Idk it's a neat concept and if you're just vaping i guess it's kind of cool but the thing is I think people would find themselves much more satisfied with just two separate rigs, whilst having it as 1 rig may seem convenient, you still have to swap out stoppers keep swapping things around every time you want to make the switch from flowers to oil.
 
NickDlow

NickDlow

Log Hog
I recieved the gb-186-1 from yingmin5 and one other with my broken d-022. Anyway I thought it can without the logo but it has it. Is it safe to use? I know u guys said something about them possibly being toxic. Also what's the point of the bottom perc? It's pretty thick n has nice volume and I don't mind the one perc being effective it's just enough IMO. Or am I doing something wrong lol?
 
Last edited:
N

nemo

Well-Known Member
i think the concept is like when there is a honeycomb on top of a honeycomb... i think both the percs function, and i m kinda jealous too :lol:
 
nemo,
  • Like
Reactions: NickDlow
DieHard

DieHard

Accessory supplier
Accessory Maker
NickDlow said:
I recieved the gb-186-1 from yingmin5 and one other with my broken d-022. Anyway I thought it can without the logo but it has it. Is it safe to use? I know u guys said something about them possibly being toxic. Also what's the point of the bottom perc? It's pretty think n has nice volume and I don't mind the one perc being effective it's just enough IMO. Or am I doing something wrong lol?
Click to expand...
I think that it was mentioned that the paint in the logo MIGHT have lead or cadmium. So don't lick the logo.:p It was discussed many pages back that someone soaked the piece in Simple Green (non-toxic) for an extended time and the logo came off. Then just clean and rinse and voila.
 
Last edited:
E

Errl

Well-Known Member
NickDlow said:
I recieved the gb-186-1 from yingmin5 and one other with my broken d-022. Anyway I thought it can without the logo but it has it. Is it safe to use? I know u guys said something about them possibly being toxic. Also what's the point of the bottom perc? It's pretty thick n has nice volume and I don't mind the one perc being effective it's just enough IMO. Or am I doing something wrong lol?
Click to expand...

There is no point to the lower perc. Didn't want to say that before and spoil anyone's good time with their new piece.
 
Errl,
  • Like
Reactions: NickDlow
Frederick McGuire

Frederick McGuire

Aggressively Loungey
Errl said:
There is no point to the lower perc. Didn't want to say that before and spoil anyone's good time with their new piece.
Click to expand...
It was discussed a while back in the möbius thread, and I believe a little bit a way back in this thread, the bottom perc doesn't do much, but it does perc the water a little bit up to the 2nd perc.

It eliminates any possible natural perc chug at the bottom, so at the very least that's a positive.
 
E

Errl

Well-Known Member
Ah nice hadnt thought about reducing the chug factor. I hate the uneven chugginess of natural percs... Its the one thing about my YQ42 that drives me nuts.

Been wanting to try an inline to honeycomb for a while now for that exact reason. Love honeycombs but I hate that its always a natural perc before the honeycomb.
 
Errl,
canj00digit?

canj00digit?

All my days in a daze...
NickDlow said:
NOOOOOOO!!!!! My D-022 also came DOA from SSS. Maybe this piece specifically is exta fragile. I was looking forward to it too.:bowdown:
tKxW4Du.jpg
Click to expand...

Doh!
Sorry to see that dude.

The angry glass gods struck twice in a few days... lol. :D
 
canj00digit?,
  • Like
Reactions: BoogerMan
budha707

budha707

Well-Known Member
budha707,
alex h

alex h

Well-Known Member
budha707 said:
i truly believe that the honeycomb will work alot better. it has less dragg since it has a bunch more holes. and it looks like if it stacks like a honeycomb should. then it should vortex no problem
Click to expand...

I would have to respectfully disagree with most of this. Hope I'm wrong though!
 
MGG

MGG

Well-Known Member
TimSolo said:
How do you think these guys would perform with an arizer solo?

GB-228-F
Click to expand...

I have the same frit to turbine, mine is a male joint though.
I have a female to male adapter so i've never had issues with this but the joint is pretty close so i'm wondering how easily the arizer will fit on (I sometimes have issues fitting my bigger domes onto it).
Asides from that it functions really really well, you can see a video I did here:
 
TimSolo

TimSolo

Engineer and vaporizer aficionado
MGG said:
I have the same frit to turbine, mine is a male joint though.
I have a female to male adapter so i've never had issues with this but the joint is pretty close so i'm wondering how easily the arizer will fit on (I sometimes have issues fitting my bigger domes onto it).
Asides from that it functions really really well, you can see a video I did here:
Click to expand...
Thanks for the video, very much appreciated! Could you maybe try holding your solo in position above it to see if it would fit? If it doesn't fit for sure I'll probably go with the D020-2S with an adapter like yours, although I don't like to stack my solo too high. I'm currently using this piece from kathy but the honeycomb doesn't give enough diffusion and I sometimes find myself coughing while vaping. It seems to leave about as much space as the pieces above so it probably will be fine...
1.0x0.jpg
 
TimSolo,
  • Like
Reactions: ataxian
FUnhouse

FUnhouse

Well-Known Member
TimSolo said:
How do you think these guys would perform with an arizer solo?

GB-228-F
rBVaGFQ8hEqAE6PPAABvKrNbzow374.jpg


GB-226
Click to expand...

I have the same question about this one .
I used the honeycomb version of this with the make joint with a Nano and it fit ok .

I tried to use my Solo with a F to F adapter I only have a male Solo GonG and I didn't like it at all .
Though the Solo was unbalanced and too high up and had too much drag .
I have been looking at this one because of the female joint and Fritted disk and wondering if it would be any better .
 
FUnhouse,
MGG

MGG

Well-Known Member
If you're using an old model of the solo (with restrictive draw) then I yeah, adding a fritted disk with that would equal a lot of drag. Unfortunately I can't check the solo right now but I personally dont think it'd fit without an adapter :S
 
MGG,
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom