Breathemetal
Well-Known Member
Accepted!
Nectar or oil?
Sorry for the double post did not realize
Nectar or oil?
Sorry for the double post did not realize
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that I originally got the same verification message while using Mozilla Firefox and disregarded it. Visited and logged on several times without problems. Not a computer savvy person myself on security matters, but doesn't an http:/ prefix indicate secure access? If so, OLorganics.com is not an http:/ recognized site as far as I can tell - but still I experienced no problems.Mozilla doesn't like that new site:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.olorganics.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
www.olorganics.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.ipage.com, ipage.com (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)
If you understand what's going on, you can tell Firefox to start trusting this site's identification. Even if you trust the site, this error could mean that someone is tampering with your connection.
Don't add an exception unless you know there's a good reason why this site doesn't use trusted identification."
I'm tempted to go and sign up again anyways, what do you think?
Mozilla doesn't like that new site:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to ---------------------------, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
------------------------uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.ipage.com, ipage.com (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)
If you understand what's going on, you can tell Firefox to start trusting this site's identification. Even if you trust the site, this error could mean that someone is tampering with your connection.
Don't add an exception unless you know there's a good reason why this site doesn't use trusted identification."
I'm tempted to go and sign up again anyways, what do you think?
Im not that savvy either, but perhaps a bit more than you! https:/ is the "secure" prefix.I think that I originally got the same verification message while using Mozilla Firefox and disregarded it. Visited and logged on several times without problems. Not a computer savvy person myself on security matters, but doesn't an http:/ prefix indicate secure access? If so, OLorganics.com is not an http:/ recognized site as far as I can tell - but still I experienced no problems.
Please tell us what site you went to (was it Canibdol.com?), and what was the process for signing up again. Thanks!Maybe I did make an "exception" earlier, I can't really remember
Anyways I signed up again
No, it was the olorganics one now I'm a bit confused...Please tell us what site you went to (was it Canibdol.com?), and what was the process for signing up again. Thanks!
OK ...got it! Thanks again!No, it was the olorganics one now I'm a bit confused...
I went to the other one a week or so ago and never heard back. These q's were pretty much the same, just asking for basic personal info, but with a little more room for comments like for medical use.
Ok, now I've got some questions. Firstly, about the obvious plant material in this oil - which OL themselves admit is there does not show up in this analysis. Surely the MS they used can detect chlorophyll and other plant materials?Hello,
I provided last November a sample of the 38% CBD concentrate (Critical Widow) from Omega Labs (bought at cbdoil4u.com still open in last November) to landrace (Not For Human French Association) to be analyzed by a independent laboratory, here is the full report :
"Here the results of the sample sent by **** **** November, 11 2014. We received a greenish gel which was dissolved without difficulty in deuterated methanol in order to make the RMN analysis. The sample was also analyzed with mass spectrometry (MS). We did not find any CBD (cannabidiol). On the other side, we found a concoction of about 75% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which has the same mass as CBD but not the same RMN spectrum, and 25% of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). The product contains also ethanol. Please find attached the RMN 1H spectrum of the analyzed product"
(sorry for the poor translation)
Here the original text in french :
"Voici nos résultats pour l'échantillon envoyé par **** **** le 25/11/2014. Nous avons reçu un gel verdâtre qui a été dissous sans difficulté dans du méthanol deutéré pour faire les diverses analyses RMN. L'échantillon a également été analysé en spectrométrie de masse (MS). Nous n'avons pas trouvé de CBD (cannabidiol). Par contre, nous avons montré la présence d'un mélange d'environ 75% de delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) qui a la même masse que le CBD mais pas le même spectre RMN et de 25% de delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). Le produit contient également de l'éthanol. Vous trouverez en attach le spectre RMN 1H du produit analysé."
I didn't think it was possible to get acids (THCa), especially in such high amount, when a product undergoes decarboxylization (sp?) - perhaps slight trace amounts but no more. I still don't. What would the effect be on an individual given THC & THCa at this 75%:20% ratio? Mostly great reports thus far on this thread for various OL products. Haven't heard or experienced anything out of the ordinary.Hello,
I provided last November a sample of the 38% CBD concentrate (Critical Widow) from Omega Labs (bought at cbdoil4u.com still open in last November) to landrace (Not For Human French Association) to be analyzed by a independent laboratory, here is the full report :
"Here the results of the sample sent by **** **** November, 11 2014. We received a greenish gel which was dissolved without difficulty in deuterated methanol in order to make the RMN analysis. The sample was also analyzed with mass spectrometry (MS). We did not find any CBD (cannabidiol). On the other side, we found a concoction of about 75% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which has the same mass as CBD but not the same RMN spectrum, and 25% of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). The product contains also ethanol. Please find attached the RMN 1H spectrum of the analyzed product"
(sorry for the poor translation)
Here the original text in french :
"Voici nos résultats pour l'échantillon envoyé par **** **** le 25/11/2014. Nous avons reçu un gel verdâtre qui a été dissous sans difficulté dans du méthanol deutéré pour faire les diverses analyses RMN. L'échantillon a également été analysé en spectrométrie de masse (MS). Nous n'avons pas trouvé de CBD (cannabidiol). Par contre, nous avons montré la présence d'un mélange d'environ 75% de delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) qui a la même masse que le CBD mais pas le même spectre RMN et de 25% de delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). Le produit contient également de l'éthanol. Vous trouverez en attach le spectre RMN 1H du produit analysé."
If any of us were dabbing an oil that was nothing but THC and THCA with small amounts of ethanol, we would be getting stupidly high, uncomfortably so. Especially in the sized dabs of deadhead OG I have sometimes I should have had many panic attacks by now. This has not happened.I didn't think it was possible to get acids (THCa), especially in such high amount, when a product undergoes decarboxylization (sp?) - perhaps slight trace amounts but no more. I still don't. What would the effect be on an individual given THC & THCa at this 75%:20% ratio? Mostly great reports thus far on this thread for various OL products. Haven't heard or experienced anything out of the ordinary.
It has been my understanding that these concentrates are all decarbed at some point in the process. As this happens, the THCa (typically starting at about 25% pre-carbed content) converts to THC (pre-carbed content typically starts well below 25%, and usually much lower than 12%). I could be way off on these figures - need a resident expert to correct me and to guide the discussion. Given these preliminary starting points, how does one end up with 75%:25%, assuming carbed, in a product never intended to be such? Sorry ...just not making much sense to me - and especially in consideration of herbivore21's points.It is definitely possible to have concentrates that contain both THC and THCA in these measures, there are a few possible ways a concentrate could end up this way.
I have never seen the word 'pre-carbed' before lol - Do you mean decarbed?It has been my understanding that these concentrates are all decarbed at some point in the process. As this happens, the THCa (typically starting at about 25% pre-carbed content) converts to THC (pre-carbed content typically starts well below 25%, and usually much lower than 12%). I could be way off on these figures - need a resident expert to correct me and to guide the discussion. Given these preliminary starting points, how does one end up with 75%:25%, assuming carbed, in a product never intended to be such? Sorry ...just not making much sense to me - and especially in consideration of herbivore21's points.
Actually, I do mean to say "pre-carbed", as in, a fresh state prior to carbing the plant matter. In any event, until some serious questions are answered regarding the accuracy & authenticity of the alleged report, I will leave the doors and windows open in order to let the odd smell of Red Herring aire out of the house.I have never seen the word 'pre-carbed' before lol - Do you mean decarbed?
Lol what you are referring to is the cannabinoid in it's carboxilic acid state, but I gotcha.Actually, I do mean to say "pre-carbed", as in, a fresh state prior to carbing the plant matter.
Thanks @herbivore21 for the clarification!Lol what you are referring to is the cannabinoid in it's carboxilic acid state, but I gotcha.
Remember that decarboxilation will happen on the plant to some extent before harvest due to UV exposure necessary for any plant to survive. Furthermore, when we decarb concentrates, this happens gradually. Not all of the THCA becomes THC straight away!
As such, we could really get any ratio of THC-THCA in a given concentrate depending on the conditions of the growing/harvesting/handling of original material all the way through to how deliberate decarb of the concentrate was carried out and whether it was carried out at enough heat (and/or low enough pressure in the case of cold-boil decarboxilation)/long enough to fully decarb the material.
those results do look wrong... I have never tried THC concentrates because flowers are pretty much to potent for me...Actually, I do mean to say "pre-carbed", as in, a fresh state prior to carbing the plant matter. In any event, until some serious questions are answered regarding the accuracy & authenticity of the alleged report, I will leave the doors and windows open in order to let the odd smell of Red Herring aire out of the house.