Swallowed, Chewed and Drowned By Hippos – Strange Deaths by Africa’s Most Dangerous AnimalIn the new Jamanji, Hippos are carnivores one must evade.
Jack Black channels a "mean girl". The Rock channels a meek, nerdy teen, Kevin Hart plays a great character. I laughed. If you don't expect too much, you'll be pleasantly surprised. Goofy kid film.Is the second one fun without Robin Williams?
Marijuana linked to 'unbearable' sickness across US as use grows following legalisation
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...olorado-chicago-medicine-health-a8295491.html
The phrases "a very common problem " used in this article make me question the intent. You would think a concentrated diverse sample such as FC, "a very common problem" would be exposed.
Did you experience it just with combusting, or with vaping as well? If you were experiencing the same thing being described above, your example would suggest that they may be going about trying to understand this malady all wrong. Your data point would suggest that it probably isn't THC causing the issues, but potentially fertilizers or pesticides or even specific strains.I've had an issue with this twice.
The symptoms are just as described, but I changed growers and haven't had the symptoms in years.
I think you are probably right that Sessions is not stupid even if he is ignorant. More importantly I think he is likely a moralist who believes that only his moral positions are correct and everyone else who feels differently are evil and should be punished. What better job than one that can force his moral views on others by trying to use the force of law to make others conform.A theory regarding whether Jeff Sessions is an idiot:
Clearly parts of the guy's brain work, so why would someone with a mostly working brain be so boldly against science(most smart folk can't get away with that), unless the science didn't line up with that person's agenda. Influenced perhaps by the alcohol, big pharm, or private prison lobbies, if this person's suppressing the growth of the cannabis industry could potentially lead to more money, power, or position, I would think those are not the actions of an idiot, but a greedy Lilliputian.
Vaping only. Hadn't smoked for years before my first instance.Did you experience it just with combusting, or with vaping as well?...
Vaping only. Hadn't smoked for years before my first instance.
At the time, Flower 75%, Concentrate 25%.flower or concentrate more favored?
Jeff is heavily funded by the Private Prison industry.
Former House Speaker John Boehner joins cannabis board - CNNPolitics
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/11/politics/boehner-cannabis-company-board/index.html
As long as the green(the root of all evil "green", not God's gift of "green") in it for them, they'll spin whichever way the $s lead them.
Is this the angriest emoji we have?
Former House Speaker John Boehner joins cannabis board - CNNPolitics
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/11/politics/boehner-cannabis-company-board/index.html
As long as the green(the root of all evil "green", not God's gift of "green") in it for them, they'll spin whichever way the $s lead them.
Is this the angriest emoji we have?
Good point @OldNewbie I should have prefaced with, "Good news but..."Sigh. We win one who was on the other side not too long ago and we're supposed to be angry?
It's like my first wife.
W: "My goodness this room is filthy!" she'd say.
ON: "Would you like me to clean it up?" I'd reply.
W: "Look at it, what do you think?"
ON: (Looking at it and not really seeing the problem.) "Should I get the vacuum?"
W: "Nooooooo!"
ON: "I'll start cleaning."
W: (Angrily) "I don't want you to clean it because I want you to, I want you to want to clean it."
Personally? I just want to win. We're now one step closer to winning. (Actually, because he will bring in money, lots more steps closer.)
@OldNewbie - I'd be angry depending on the reason for the turn-around but I damn sure wouldn't turn away the help.
I mentioned the following in another thread where I saw the same info....
Were Boehner and Weld just holding the party line before and now that they no longer feel obligated can express their true beliefs OR were they offered enough money to change their views (and become pseudo lobbyists) OR did they really have an epiphany? I'm guessing it's the money.
If they were just holding to the party line then fuck em.
If they're doing it for money then fuck em.
If they had an epiphany then ... welcome aboard!
Sigh. We win one who was on the other side not too long ago and we're supposed to be angry?
It's like my first wife.
W: "My goodness this room is filthy!" she'd say.
ON: "Would you like me to clean it up?" I'd reply.
W: "Look at it, what do you think?"
ON: (Looking at it and not really seeing the problem.) "Should I get the vacuum?"
W: "Nooooooo!"
ON: "I'll start cleaning."
W: (Angrily) "I don't want you to clean it because I want you to, I want you to want to clean it."
Personally? I just want to win. We're now one step closer to winning. (Actually, because he will bring in money, lots more steps closer.)
I know there are purists still out there who want cannabis to be grown by hand by friends down the street with no pesticides and known genetics and then handled with care by expert trimmers with some bubble hash of fine quality cleanly screened of part and the rest properly stored for sale. I want that too. Except that lots of people want that and the capacity is not there now; nor will it ever be--if every single other product in society is any guide.It may be a "win", but it still makes me nauseous. I'll take the support but boner is still a bad actor and no friend to the movement.
I didn't express my complete thoughts in my initial post. I applaud any shift in the right direction and a prominent opponent like Boehner is a score. My anger is ignited when these drug warriors shift only when it serves their financial interests. He fought against it when he could have been an instrument of change, bennifitting the many, but now that he's going to profit from it, it's time for a shift.I know there are purists still out there who want cannabis to be grown by hand by friends down the street with no pesticides and known genetics and then handled with care by expert trimmers with some bubble hash of fine quality cleanly screened of part and the rest properly stored for sale. I want that too. Except that lots of people want that and the capacity is not there now; nor will it ever be--if every single other product in society is any guide.
Boehner is going to bring in money, respectability and political influence/access to "the movement". He reaches the half of society that is not in the cannabis car and knows how to make things happen. Anyone who does not like the fact he is coming on board is either a purist or who is not looking to have cannabis realistically available to the population.
I agree that whatever regulatory state control that results will not have the little guys interests at heart. That's going to be true no matter how much "big money" comes in. Classical liberals, such as myself, would prefer no regulation. True cannabis legalization. We know that's not going to happen because the left wants all that sweet, sweet cash for their permission and the right is coming around to understanding regulation reduces the harm of drug war policies AND the harm from the drug itself by using that sweet, sweet cash for mitigation.
Even if the big money comes in, I suspect there will be a niche market for the small farm, special care cannabis the purists want. It's just that they will have to pay for it. Mass production is going to make the price/quality more to the liking of the majority of the market. The luxury/connoisseur/no-additive market will still be there for the rest.