is it just me or might it just be, that the solo II is more "vulnerable" comapred to its older brother, the solo OG ?
Unfortunately, I think you have a point. We get a potentially inaccurate view since we're such a small fraction of the total but we're sure seeing a LOT more troubles with this new version.
Did anyone ever have an 'error code' type failure with Solo I? Some 'lock ups' happened as I recall, but they were all 'fixed by reset'? How many ever had to send one in for repair under warranty?
In the larger picture, a single return is a big deal to the maker. Just one can eat up the profits from a bunch of other units. IMO they want to be on top of this and quickly. We can/should trust that to happen although we might never know what changes might come of it. There is, of course, a solid reason for not inviting every past owner to demand a replacement?
It's a great vape, the maker will stand by it should we have troubles as individuals. I'm enjoying mine and intend to continue to, but I'm also being careful with stems........
OTOH, none of my Solo Is (and there have been many) has missed a beat. That's many many hundreds of sessions I've done over the years, but I've 'passed on' half a dozen or more ('last call' buys from PIU passed on at about $70 average?) and given two away outright. I also have one out on loan.....somewhere. None of those have reported problems (I'm sure to hear about all but one of them).
OF