I hope it has the same amount, or more.
Enough to make a difference.
Not enough to argue with people on the internet over.
I get it I'm saying some unpopular things, but I don't see it as arguing. It's a discussion, the very reason this (or other) Forum is for? Discussions, hopefully 'backed up' with facts.
That's what I feel I've done. I've said it's conduction and there is basically no such thing as conduction/convection hybrids at the levels we use here. Thermodynamics simply doesn't allow it. That's the science here I think (and would welcome a discussion on that level).
Opinions are fine, great even at times. But here the discussion is using technical terms incorrectly, IMO that should be called out. We owe it to each other to be honest (and polite) in such things so folks can get information they can trust to base decisions on.
Feel free to post your opinions about what is going on, but you should expect me to disagree (and provide evidence) as I hope others would do with me. If you say something important that I think isn't so (and can demonstrate)I feel it's important to do so.
If you have any 'evidence' to back up the opinion, please bring it on? TIA.
Once again, I point to PIU who was honest with '......after careful inspection we conclude there is no convection going on'. They have every reason to 'sing the party line' and make more sales, but chose honesty? Hopefully folks trust Randy?
Shame this is not and on demand convection portable. I dont do electric conduction anymore.
Arizer make some great products if they did decide to do a convection portable sure it would be great.
I understand there is a strong demand for this idea. I've used some convection vapes, and still do in many cases, but don't share this opinion here. It's just not practical I think?
There are existing options, of course, that avoid Butane power (which seems taboo in some circles). GH and ESV come to mind. I don't have a GH but understand they have some reliability/use issues? I do have an ESV (two in fact, I got one real cheap.....). They can, with enough fiddling, vape a bowl very well but you won't like the battery life. Convection eats up the power, also making the vapor hotter (not easy to cool in compact vapes) and the vape itself hotter to hold.
If you allow Butane, VGs are excellent examples of 'on demand convection vapes'. They 'get around the power consumption issue by using gas which has huge energy capacity.
If it could be done well, I agree, Arizer would be right there in the lead. But since they aren't doing it I suggest there are technical issues, not marketing decisions, that are preventing that?
And remember, even with conduction (as in Summit) just the 'on demand' part can hammer battery life big time. My Summit OG sometimes gets only one complete bowl on a charge if I hit it over and over and over. It takes a lot of power to get that first hit from cold. And if every hit is a 'first hit' from a power consumption POV, power capacity becomes a critical point real fast.
If you must have an on demand convection vape you have a couple of choices in the market, but the very fact they are not taking over the vaping world says there are problems with the idea? No, not problems, but 'undesirable trade-offs' to get there?
Have you tried VG, GH or ESV? What did you think of them?
Capitalism is great IMO. If it was possible, Arizer or some other 'smart outfit' would smell the profit and bring it to market. Competition makes that happen if we let it. It's definitely not for lack of desire or trying.
Regards,
OF
Edit:
Those on demand convection vapes eat so much battery though that it tends to compromise their portability. My Grasshopper was very portable but only got like one bowl per charge, so it needed a whole carry kit of accessories to sustain its portability.
This is interesting, I stopped following that thread a while back as deadlines came and went on a nearly weekly basis. Kind of glad I never 'bought in' I think. This battery is the one they advertised as providing HOURS of vaping early on (when they wanted folks to put down deposits on the promises)?
That (unrealistic battery life claims) was the clue to me. They were 'winging it' and didn't have the experience with Production to see it? Wishful thinking over provable technology. I used ESV as an example of why real world power demands wouldn't allow such performance (I think I estimated 6 minutes total heating time?). Gratifying to know the rules of Physics are still in effect, I'm getting too old to learn new ones for sure. Thanks for the timely data point.
OF