Search results

Here’s the initial explanation: So according to this, Evolv decide to have a mom and pop smoke shop beta test their brand new $400 wax pen. So far, so good (they’re in the same neck of the woods, so this seem plausible so far). Then they ship the store their first non-beta-unit shipment (to...

I’ve gotta be honest: this whole narrative really strikes me as implausible. If this shop was selling stock for beta testing, why is there literally nothing else on the internet about people’s experience with this device, aside from this post? OP, with all due respect: please think carefully...

I’d love to see some video of a dab of rosin being taken, from loading all the way through to a good view of what’s left in the crucible after the dab is done.

You might want to encourage Brandon to join the conversation here. If you’re not acting as a company rep (as you claim), it seems like we’d need one to join and coordinate this kind of group-buy/public-beta.

Interested in hearing more about this^

Aside from the ti, the only other thing I’m not loving is the faux-carbon-fiber side panels. Fake CF (and even real CF that isn’t serving a functional purpose) has been a chintzy look for well over a decade now, and just screams “teenager with a Gpen”.

Oh man, I’m loving that form factor and would be so eager to throw my money at it if the crucible wasn’t ti. What’s the temp range? I read that it was adjustable at 1 degree increments, but haven’t seen anything about min/max temps.

Well, this “data” sure sounds scientifically relevant. Ok, back to dabbing at my totally real temp preference of 69420 Kelvin.

The funny thing is that basically 100% of the folks worrying about benzene are incapable of explaining where it’s coming from and how, and certainly aren’t doing any sort of educated risk-assessment. It’s basically just “toxins = bad!” + “numbers = science!” + “assumptions = probably correct...

Jesus, that fucking chart just won’t die. It’s like the kudzu vine of bro science. And not even competent bro science, it’s like a masterclass in scientific illiteracy. Thanks for taking the time for some debunking, OP.

But the NDA!!!!! :rofl:

Thanks for the info (and the confirmation that the images on page 1 are renders rather than prototypes). Regarding the patent, I tracked it down as well and realized it’s four years old, which explains a LOT about this whole thread.

Honestly, that’s how mine has always been. I get two bowls per charge; trying for a third always results in the chasing-lights (low batt indicator). Full disclosure: I vape my bowls pretty hard, at least 6-8 draws wrapped up with a loooong slow hit on level 4, and fill them pretty darn full (at...

So just provide a verbal narrative. If you’re at all serious about courting investors, you’re going to need to learn how to do this. But yeah, this is a massive red-flag that you don’t actually have a patent on your idea.

Like someone who’s asked a basic question multiple times and been given the runaround. So, the revolving mechanism: how does it work? ELI5. Edit to add: please keep in mind that this thread is ground-zero for the Gyre vape and the people running the company, as far as the internet is concerned...

Good lord, little buddy. You’re talking like a twelve year old. Why not take a deep breath and explain how the revolving mechanism works? You know, like you’ll need to do with an investor?

But the top thicker part narrows down to basically battery-width before it reaches a junction that could rotate. So what’s actually happening with the chambers and their contact to the battery? It’s not like the rotation would re-center the chamber over the battery. If you don’t want to share...

I’m seeing several different unanswered questions in this thread; you might try re-reading with a less defensive eye. Here’s one to start you off:

Maybe I’m just not catching some nuance to those quotation marks, but OP’s initial posts left me with the opposite impression: