gangababa
Well-Known Member
There is no equivalency of malevolency between Clinton and Trump, between Republican and Democratic governance. Period. Thirty years opf believing lies does not make it so.
One candidate has endured decades of negative spin and out right lying about her. Recent spin regarding FBI testimony has pushed a lie into the thinking of the never-right-minded public, those who do not want truth but rather seek justification.
The Republican and anti-Clinton perpetual motion machines' she-said lie has now been exposed by the FBI's reply to Congress's request for access to classified information that they want to use against Clinton, but can't without breaking the law.
The FBI is telling Congress that 'there is no there there', but the Congressional regressives believe more in justification of their failed point-of-view than in objective truth.
The FBI has warned Congress that the information provided is classified and may not be leaked; Congress may read these files, but no one may talk about the information.
The classified FBI files came with a public cover letter (PDF) that made important points.
Most importantly, Clinton did not lie to the FBI. She did not originate the claimed classified information.
She did not forward clearly marked secret emails. It is not proved that the 'now claimed to be classified' information was so considered before the investigation. There is no equivalency between Clinton and Petreaus.
FBI cover letter confirms that the three emails about which the media is obfuscating, did not originate with Secretary Clinton.
"compared the Clinton emails with the prosecutions of Bryan Nishimura, David Petraeus, and Sandy Berger. In all of those cases, the FBI said, there was "clear evidence of knowledge and intent," which was not present in this investigation."
"As for the term "extremely careless," Herring explained that the term was "intended to be a common sense way of describing the actions of Secretary Clinton and her colleagues." He further clarified that "the facts did not support a recommendation to prosecute her or others within the scope of the investigation for gross negligence."
Evidence suggests that the State Department, White House, FBI, DNC, and Hillary Clinton's campaign have all been hacked and there is new evidence that even the NSA was hacked.
Regarding Clinton's server, there is NO evidence of hacker intrusion, only baseless rumor mongering speculation by illogical thinkers.
"Perhaps the safest e-mail system in the country was the one that Hillary Clinton was using as Secretary of State."
One candidate has endured decades of negative spin and out right lying about her. Recent spin regarding FBI testimony has pushed a lie into the thinking of the never-right-minded public, those who do not want truth but rather seek justification.
The Republican and anti-Clinton perpetual motion machines' she-said lie has now been exposed by the FBI's reply to Congress's request for access to classified information that they want to use against Clinton, but can't without breaking the law.
The FBI is telling Congress that 'there is no there there', but the Congressional regressives believe more in justification of their failed point-of-view than in objective truth.
The FBI has warned Congress that the information provided is classified and may not be leaked; Congress may read these files, but no one may talk about the information.
The classified FBI files came with a public cover letter (PDF) that made important points.
Most importantly, Clinton did not lie to the FBI. She did not originate the claimed classified information.
She did not forward clearly marked secret emails. It is not proved that the 'now claimed to be classified' information was so considered before the investigation. There is no equivalency between Clinton and Petreaus.
FBI cover letter confirms that the three emails about which the media is obfuscating, did not originate with Secretary Clinton.
"compared the Clinton emails with the prosecutions of Bryan Nishimura, David Petraeus, and Sandy Berger. In all of those cases, the FBI said, there was "clear evidence of knowledge and intent," which was not present in this investigation."
"As for the term "extremely careless," Herring explained that the term was "intended to be a common sense way of describing the actions of Secretary Clinton and her colleagues." He further clarified that "the facts did not support a recommendation to prosecute her or others within the scope of the investigation for gross negligence."
Evidence suggests that the State Department, White House, FBI, DNC, and Hillary Clinton's campaign have all been hacked and there is new evidence that even the NSA was hacked.
Regarding Clinton's server, there is NO evidence of hacker intrusion, only baseless rumor mongering speculation by illogical thinkers.
"Perhaps the safest e-mail system in the country was the one that Hillary Clinton was using as Secretary of State."
"