I do not believe that Hillary is the lesser of two evils. I think both are equally as evil (these things can hardly be quantified), but because of the demographic they pander to, they say different things. My opinion is that Hillary is worse for this country because she would push the democrats further right, versus Trump winning, causing a backlash from the left.
Trump is evil for the things he has said, but he did not vote for the Iraq war, then lobby for a war in Libya, then Syria. I don't think people who made that terrible decision (and who refuses to own that decision) should be able to hold office. Period.
And yes, I think Trump has a better plan to deal with Iraq and Syria than Clinton. It's not a great plan, but involves going after ISIS instead of the Syrian government. There is nothing more backwards than attacking the sovereign government fighting ISIS, while simultaneously funding rebels who have no chance of creating any form of governing system besides Sharia.
Drumpf said he wants to let other countries have nukes.
Hillary did not vote for war either.
HIllarys Vote On Presidential Authority for Bush
Hillary "voted for war" is a very simplistic description of her vote.
The things she said on the floor of the Senate matter:
Hillary:"Even though the resolution before the Senate is not as strong as I would like in requiring the diplomatic route first, and placing highest priority on a simple, clear requirement for unlimited inspections, I will take the President as his word that he will try hard to pass a U.N. resolution and will seek to avoid war if at all possible.
Because bi-partisan support for this resolution makes success in the United Nations more likely, and therefore war less likely, and because a good-faith effort by the United States, even if it fails, will bring more allies and legitimacy to our cause.
If we were to defeat this resolution or pass with only a few Democrats, I am concerned that those that want to pretend that this problem will go away with delay, will oppose any U.N. resolution calling for unrestricted inspections.
This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should be hard. But I cast it with conviction.
My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of pre-emption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose, all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law, and for the peace and security of people throughout the world.
A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war, it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President. And we say to him, use these powers wisely and as a last resort."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...tical-regret-iraq_us_5718ccf0e4b0c9244a7aed6a
!
