Hi again!
...I can't see how to do that with common household stuff.
It could hardly get more "common" than this: a sauce bottle, brass plumbing hardware assembled with hot glue, aquarium tubing... All food-grade. My initial intent was only to make my experience accessible to the masses in order to render a discussion possible on the basis of our individual evaluations.
StinkMeaner's post makes more sense everytime i revisit it but i was after a more affordable deal and neither of those two very different scenarios attracted popular attention anyway...
...we have to conceive or find a kind of plastic or glass piece who specially fits to receive the mist module and the water, providing a unlimited airflow, with a nice mouthpiece and a 18mm air intake to fit every kind of vape.
At the time i only wished curious readers to consider a test of their own: my priority was to get someone to try fog conditioning to begin with, beyond that it's up to the community to decide as i've done my share about it! Now that i've made a few circles around this technology my position is that it shouldn't be trusted except for use in an
EXPERIMENT, that's my advice of caution.
Actually i'm unable to endorse any concept where one of these "pucks" would be dropped inside a glass container for use on a routine basis while i have concerns about reliability versus health risks. As sold the Mist maker is OKay for my purpose but it's definitely not something i'd want to see in fancy glassware. Too bad but a person who'd be tempted to launch a commercial venture targeting the fog conditioning niche first needs to find a way to remove the electronics from our air/vapour paths. This means that brave individual may very well have to design and produce a "clean" driver-less socket for the piezo-ceramic element, with an adpater to plug into a standard Mist Maker receptacle remotely located OUTSIDE, in a water container of its own, seperated physically from the paths to my lungs by a pair of electrical conductors (trivial but effective!)... Otherwise it would remain "experimental" and i sense this single prospect may be causing fears...
Sounds good. I've tried to acquire some compatible glassware, actually. This attempt failed because i didn't see how to connect my HerbalAire to it, but i might find one in the weeks/months to come, eventually, during my next trip to Montreal for example (the opportunities are just too limited in my remote country-side town).
At this time the most important step perhaps would be to collect testimonies from a diverse set of vaporists from all horizons. So, i guess those people need to be told about ways to experiment with fog before anything else. I'm confident glass blowers can/will take over once fog conditioning has gained in popularity, eventually - but they won't need to do much really as all it takes is a way to suspend the piezo element in the center of a water volume - which i believe isn't in the hands of glass blowers at this time.
There's no glass in the Mist Maker, i'd rather bet on manufacturers working with other materials instead (e.g. metal, plastics, ceramic, etc.), in order to reduce the intrusion of electronic hardware into our air/vapour paths as much as it's conceivable!... The artistic touch would come right next.
In any case the good news is that there are a few ways now reasonably accessible to fog enthousiasts:
1) Go vaporize in a sona!
2) Try StinkMeaner's idea
3) Play with a Mist Maker
No matter what, if nobody sees the benefit then lets forget about dreaming of fancy glass!
