josemembreno
Well-Known Member
Has anyone had any cracked bubblers from sunshine store? If so, how did they handle the return? Did they want you to ship it back? Please include all details. Thanks.
Cheap High Quality Bubbler
- Thread starter Bleezy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cheap bubbler glass
Poostuff
Please delete
I think your friend wasn't doing it right. The nano will milk up bigger pieces really quickly, I'll post a video if I can get over my privacy issues. The vapour is thick but (this is a dumb way of describing it) it's more Solo thick than Evo thick if that makes sense. I use it with the 186 & 187 from yingmin. It works really well in both of them but if I was only buying one for it I'd go for the 187 style.
SnidelyWhiplash
Well-Known Member
OMG tell me someone has tried this: http://www.dhgate.com/store/product/12-pcs-lot-16cm-hand-made-curved-sweet-puff/195789362.html
Im tempted. It's just so unique...
Im tempted. It's just so unique...
MarsellusWallace
Well-Known Member
I'm eventually getting an E-Nano and I am deciding between two DHgate pieces: the D022 and FC-187.
Can anyone who has used the D022 comment on the function of the "double chamber" it has? I'm a glass noob and I have no idea whether that would add any benefits like a smoother hit or whatever.
Can anyone who has used the D022 comment on the function of the "double chamber" it has? I'm a glass noob and I have no idea whether that would add any benefits like a smoother hit or whatever.
I don't own the Do22, but I have been through several 187's (both GB and FC). I really like the 187's. The Do22 second chamber, referred by to by some around here as "the tumor" may add some extra smoothness at the expense of flavor. Either wet or dry. @ataxian is a big fan of the Do22, maybe he can comment.
EverythingsHazy
Well-Known Member
IKR...
At least the 1000 is nice
EDIT:
I just counted the slits on a few of my matrices:
FC-1000 Matrix Perc - 21 Slits, 2 bands
FC-186 Stereo Matrix - 18 Slits, 2 bands for both percs
Yingmin Stereo Marix - 25 Slits, 2 bands for both percs
Yea, I'm really happy with how the fc-1000 came out, and from what I've been hearing, I think pretty much everybody who bought one is happy with the design specs as well. Glad it worked out in the end.
And thanks for counting the slits on the percs. I've been meaning to compare the gb-186 and the fc-1000. It looked like the gb-186 had a few more but not too many. Steven used a good matrix perc for the fc-1000.
Yea cranked to 6.5-7 (varies unit to unit, home to home, and even outlet to outlet), with some good bud, you can easily get 1-2 very milky hits in pretty much any piece, including the fc-1000. It really is a very solid, high quality vape. It's also very efficient.
Something to note when testing the milking potential of the vape, is the strain. Some strains, despite being very potent, just don't make a very dense vapor, and some almost look like smoke if you shine a light the can as it fills up. I do think that the strains that make denser vapor are usually more potent, but I don't believe it is necessarily a direct correlation.
Yea, it sucks that you got sent the wrong one. Hopefully you can sell your 707 soon, and pick up an fc-1000. I think you'll really like it.
You can probably get a couple hundred for it and end up profiting if you try hard enough, since it is the next best thing to an authentic peyote pillar, and as long as you don't claim it's a Sovereignty piece, there's nothing wrong with that. If you are willing to settle for less, it shouldn't be very hard to unload at all.
Good luck!
Last edited:
MarsellusWallace
Well-Known Member
Interesting. Since one of the high praises for the E-Nano seems to be its exceptional flavor, I may want to go with the 187 to preserve that flavor as much as I can. Then again, I'm all about the smooth hits. Ah, choices...
Thanks for the info.
HSIHP
Well-Known Member
I would consider the UFO as well. I have the MF Orbiter and it is the best way IMO to use the nano.
My favorite dhGate pieces for best flavor retention are the FC-710 and the Kathy Toro Knock Off (TKO). Both are very small.
Edit to add TKO link.
http://www.dhgate.com/product/black...sh-catcher/183729712.html#s5-12-1b|2319204742
MarsellusWallace
Well-Known Member
Wow the TKO piece looks very nice. It definitely is small though.
Would you happen to have a link to a video of that thing in action (with a vape or not)? I can't seem to find any sort of model number or code in order to search on youtube (e.g. FC-187, D022).
Would you happen to have a link to a video of that thing in action (with a vape or not)? I can't seem to find any sort of model number or code in order to search on youtube (e.g. FC-187, D022).
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
I only ever used the nano with small to medium pieces, but the impression I got of it was just that of a nice log comparable to a UD or HI. Great performance that's obviously nothing to be sneezed at, but still - it's a log...
It seems to get heavy praise, I just don't really see what sets it apart from any other high quality log...
But we should probably take that discussion to another thread as it's getting a bit off topic now
I haven't tried it, but there's not much need...
It's just a single hole disc perc.
With the amount of water he's got in there, I'd imagine there's a fair bit of drag, and it will be 100% chug city...
I'd assume it'll retain a fair bit of flavour, as there's so little diffusion going on.
There's nothing functional about the wheel as far as I can tell...
The single hole perc is just offset to one side so that the exiting bubbles will hit one side of the wheel and spin it.
IMO;
If you want it purely as a show piece and you like the spinning of the wheel - go for it.
If you want something spinning parts that's also highly functional, then join me in hoping eventually we will get some kind of propeller perc piece produced at some point
@cwheezy
The FC-1000 is the largest piece of the 3 you mentioned.
IME it works better the more airflow you can give it, but I was happy using it with my solo, so it should still work fine with the nano. I might not recommend it as being a one-and-only piece with the nano, purely because it is so large, but I really love it's function. Of the 3 you listed it is my favourite, but possibly not the best suited to the nano?
The FC/GB 186 - first off, I prefer the bubbler neck of yingmins GB-186. It looks janky as fuck, but I prefer the ergonomics and the view it provides.
Stevens FC-186 seems better built, and possibly thicker.
The GB186 seems to smooth out the hit a little bit more but they both function virtually identically.
Again this perc likes a bit of airflow to get it going, probably a bit more than the fc-1000.
It's close in scale to the fc-1000, but not quite as big
The straight fab is the smallest of the 3.
This one makes the most sense to me to pair with a log like the Nano.
I actually personally prefer the matrix pillar and stereo matrix over the straight fab, they are all really nice pieces and You should be happy with any of them.
Possibly also look into the FC-Cake, FC-187, and GB-187. They are all essentially just matrix perc rigs, so they all offer a nice amount of diffusion with minimal drag. They're small-ish and relatively simple so they're a bit cheaper too
grokit
well-worn member
That's $63 each including shipping, not great but not bad. I'd buy ONE
![:\](/i/s/hmm.gif "Hmm :\")
http://www.dhgate.com/store/product/2015-new-fashion-bong-glass-water-pipe-colorful/238970274.html
In case you are really itching to throw a lot of money away...here's a regular old bong. I have one like it I'll let go for 1/3 the price.
herbivore21
Well-Known Member
I'm really tempted to get one of those pukinbeagle propeller rigs! Apparently they are really, really hard to get a hold of at the moment though!
I've got both with the nano and the 187 is really my favorite of the two. More volume and I like the 'purr' of the matrix perc. Plus the glass is much thicker.
I don't really see much benefit of the second chamber in the D022. It's certainly not a bad piece though. But I definitely prefer the 187.
digigator
Well-Known Member
No need to apologize
It's just better to keep things clear
Percs and such can get confusing to keep track of...
Someone (sorry can't remember who) mentioned Steven had mentioned a V2 to them...
I personally didn't like the sound of the changes, but no-one has really discussed them further as far as I know... There may be design reasons for certain changes that I'm not aware of, but ATM they sound like a step backwards
I'm going to contact Steven later today to ask about it
I have all 3 of those pieces.
I'll do a quick comparison post of them for you soon
My first thought is that of the 3 the straight fab might be a bit of a better fit because its the smallest of them.
Can the nano really keep up milking a bigger piece? I only got to try a friends nano a few times and wasn't as impressed as I thought I would be based on its rep around here...
It could just be because they've been doing those techniques on recent pieces?
I know for sure I've seen a coin rig (or whatever that mid section is called) from one or two sellers recently, and the fab eggs have been exploding all over dhgate...
IKR...
At least the 1000 is nice
EDIT:
I just counted the slits on a few of my matrices:
FC-1000 Matrix Perc - 21 Slits, 2 bands
FC-186 Stereo Matrix - 18 Slits, 2 bands for both percs
Yingmin Stereo Marix - 25 Slits, 2 bands for both percs
Hey I was the one that mentioned Steven has a V2 FC-1000 coming. Here's the picture he sent me:
I disagree with most of these changes. I can see how shortening the pillars would reduce the initial drag some what, but that doesn't bother me enough to warrant the change. I'm a huge fan of my V1!
I had the FC-187v1 by Steven and the GB-187-S by Yingmin5. Sold my FC-187 and use my GB-187-S every day with the Nano.
For what it's worth - both 187's use a matrix perc - it provides a moderate level of diffusion.
For higher flavor, you want a bubbler with less diffusion, not more. Pieces like my D020 provide less diffusion and therefore more flavor than my Matrix Perc bubblers.
(But I still prefer my GB-187-S matrix perc because it provides just the right amount of diffusion for me personally)
XeroRespect
This too shall PAX...
I have the FC-187v2 from Steven (my 1st piece from DH Gate). I have since purchased numerous pieces, and always come back to the FC-187v2 as my go to piece for the Underdog. Seems to have the perfect diffusion/flavor for me, and the right size can to milk.
@Ratchett , what was it about the GB-187 that you liked better than the FC-187?
Build quality
My FC-187v1 perc was absolute shit, fired through literally only 1 slit when using with my Nano.
My GB-187-S however is perfect, everything properly aligned, matrix perc perfectly cut. No cracks or defects in the piece, and the perc fires properly entirely around the piece.
alltoreup
Damn you, party liquor
Has the person that wanted the neck changed on the FC-1000 actually hit the current one? I'm waiting on my replacement fc1000 but my cracked one still hits great and I don't think I've ever seen any water pooling in the neck. Mine never even bubbles high enough to reach the neck except on a massive clear and even then most water hits the top of the can.
I just don't see why changing the original makes much sense.
I just don't see why changing the original makes much sense.
hweezi
formally cwheezy
@cwheezy
The FC-1000 is the largest piece of the 3 you mentioned.
IME it works better the more airflow you can give it, but I was happy using it with my solo, so it should still work fine with the nano. I might not recommend it as being a one-and-only piece with the nano, purely because it is so large, but I really love it's function. Of the 3 you listed it is my favourite, but possibly not the best suited to the nano?
The FC/GB 186 - first off, I prefer the bubbler neck of yingmins GB-186. It looks janky as fuck, but I prefer the ergonomics and the view it provides.
Stevens FC-186 seems better built, and possibly thicker.
The GB186 seems to smooth out the hit a little bit more but they both function virtually identically.
Again this perc likes a bit of airflow to get it going, probably a bit more than the fc-1000.
It's close in scale to the fc-1000, but not quite as big
The straight fab is the smallest of the 3.
This one makes the most sense to me to pair with a log like the Nano.
I actually personally prefer the matrix pillar and stereo matrix over the straight fab, they are all really nice pieces and You should be happy with any of them.
Possibly also look into the FC-Cake, FC-187, and GB-187. They are all essentially just matrix perc rigs, so they all offer a nice amount of diffusion with minimal drag. They're small-ish and relatively simple so they're a bit cheaper too
Yeah I see what you mean about yingmins 186. You'd be able to watch the can fill up.
I actually have a d020-d already so I'm good on matrix percs but I am looking for another small rig with even less diffusion.
Seen this
http://www.dhgate.com/product/12pcs...lland-curved/196111920.html#s1-6-1b|953716597
Just a simple cup, but i'd love one that was 18mm.
Frederick McGuire
Aggressively Loungey
They do look pretty badass
Yeah, it just looks wrong IMO...Hey I was the one that mentioned Steven has a V2 FC-1000 coming. Here's the picture he sent me:
I disagree with most of these changes. I can see how shortening the pillars would reduce the initial drag some what, but that doesn't bother me enough to warrant the change. I'm a huge fan of my V1!
Does anyone like the proposed changes?
If so please speak up because I'm not seeing the advantages...
@EverythingsHazy The slanted neck joint was your idea wasn't it?
Have you had any pooling issues with the V1?
The Barrel to funnel is one of my favourite smaller rigs
The FC-710 diffusion pump is an awesome little low-diffusion option too
And then there's the pillar cycler and the d-cycler as some cool higher diffusion options
Zufi Raj
Master Zufi
I have now pulled the trigger on the FC 1000 !!!
BTW: I sent Steven my suggestions as to modifying the FC707 and he says he could incorporate into the next batch.
They have stocks of the FC 707 & 1000 so would need to sell those before the new modified versions could be made and they have to fulfil some other bigger orders first.
Hopefully this means that the delivery will be relatively quick!
I would have gone for a modified FC 707 but he couldn't give me a date for when the next batch would be made.
The FC 1000 looks pretty awesome; I've asked Steven to test it and wrap it carefully; and am hoping it gets to me in one piece!
So far Steven has been very polite and prompt and helpful in answering questions and e-mails.
BTW: I sent Steven my suggestions as to modifying the FC707 and he says he could incorporate into the next batch.
They have stocks of the FC 707 & 1000 so would need to sell those before the new modified versions could be made and they have to fulfil some other bigger orders first.
Hopefully this means that the delivery will be relatively quick!
I would have gone for a modified FC 707 but he couldn't give me a date for when the next batch would be made.
The FC 1000 looks pretty awesome; I've asked Steven to test it and wrap it carefully; and am hoping it gets to me in one piece!
So far Steven has been very polite and prompt and helpful in answering questions and e-mails.
pacifica333
Well-Known Member
Link to this piece? Can't seem to find it on CCG's store.
EverythingsHazy
Well-Known Member
Yea, it was one of my original ideas. That was one of my early mock ups of the design. I also thought he should've remade the gb-186 with a bubbler style neck, and a slanted connection too, instead of the fc-186 style neck, but he didn't.
In the mockup pick it does look a little weird, but I don't think it'd be too ugly if done well.
I wonder who went along with that pic and asked him to make changes.
That said, I haven't had any problems with the v1. A little water does get up there there if you clear hard enough, but not enough to be a problem.
As for V2, tbh, I wouldn't change much, but if he is going to, I think the pillars could maybe be an inch shorter, and the top section, an inch taller. It's definitely not needed tho. I think anything else might take away from the aesthetics.
I messaged him personally, to see what was going on here, and this is what he said:
No mention of any other changes. I told him to try to send a pic of a sample before he makes a bunch, to make sure it's still good.
Last edited: