No, the real truth is that a company is judged first by whether they get it right the first time, and by their ability to run damage control only when they blow it. But it doesn't erase the fact that they blew it. The real truth of an imperfect world is you don't always get a second chance, and first impressions are everything. Especially for a new company with their first product.
Or am I wrong and people are still buying Yugos? And will Toyota still get quality awards this year just so they don't feel crucified?
No. A failure is a failure, and every failure is one too many. A nominal failure rate is to be expected, but DOA means you couldn't get it right in the first place. It should be very rare, and zero DOA is a reasonable if you're not shipping millions of units. And unlike, say Apple, Zephyr has no track record to justify that a replacement would be any different.
You may have had a perfect experience, but my experience is a 100% failure rate; and it's their job to turn that around. They don't get that for free just like I don't get a replacement for free. It's a business transaction, and I have no obligation to spare their feelings or even give them a second chance at all. I'm posting to give Bruce a chance to respond--I'm giving him a chance to keep my business with full knowledge of how frustrated and skeptical I am. But the fact is they fell short of the expectations that they themselves set, so they have that ground to make up if I'm going to take a replacement instead of buying the "Apple" of vaporizers.
lwien said:
Considering the absurdity of it Beez, and considering the venomous intent of it with absolutely no request by him to rectify the situation along with the fact that it was his very first post here brings into question if this person is in fact, a Zephyr owner in the first place. Not saying that he's not, but it sure is suspect.
And seeing as how you only want to argue how unfair I'm being I suppose you're probably astroturfing for Zephyr. I guess I don't need to give Bruce that second chance because you probably are Bruce.
I'm not saying you are, but it sure is suspect.
lwien said:
But either way, I agree. Makes no sense but I did get a chuckle out of this quote, "being the good consumer that I am, I read the manual".
Well whooptidoo. Pats on the back and a round of drinks for the "good customer" here.
Oh good, I see you understand sarcasm too. You're busting into high double digits IQ-wise, huh?