MoltenTiger
Well-Known Member
It's not outside the realm of possibility that an existing unit could be running cooler than the setting. Given the mentions of Error 04, there is something seemingly electrically faulty. With some units reporting to not heat at all and a bit of a mixed bag result comparing ABV to the Mighty/+/Crafty... who knowsAm I the only one that thinks the Venty should get a firmware upgrade for another 20 degrees? I got the storz & bickel evaluation letter did the test on Friday. I have not gotten the results or compensation as promised. I agree the stiff plus and minus buttons are an issue.
That said, 210°C is a cooler setting. Too cool for my preferred use. But there will always be a range of performance between each individual unit. Who knows how tight their tolerances are, but given they are near 15% away from combustion levels, they are leaving a wide margin for error.
If the Volcano can be set 20°C higher, it is <5% away from combustion levels.
I think they are relying on the power rail of a mains connection to tailor the Volcano into a more capable vape. It also has a larger chamber, I wonder what kind of wattage is included there?
With Venty, running two 18650s at 130W peak power draw, I think that is basically the limit? They are relying on plastic fins to keep the handling under control which probably means the internal insulation is lacking meaning much of the power is not going to the chamber.
I think this design is a bit backward for this day and age, pretty lacklustre material tech and it is stretching vulnerable components into new highs.
I hope they can resolve it, it still is a fine product evolution. I just wish it was an actual industry evolution, instead of this somewhat familiar fiasco.
With the new sensors, they should be able to ramp this thing up, but if it can't sustain a boosted setting for very long, I think they are flying quite close to the sun with this baked in power rail.
Last edited: