OF
Well-Known Member
You can often get a couple of impressive furlongs out of a plow horse if you use enough whip too.
To me the very fact it's not easy to do, 'natural' if you will, points to something wrong. Or at least inappropriate. A better/different tool is indicated?
It's a fine balance. If you make the load bigger you change that. You upset the volume to surface ratio. There is 'less square feet of hot surface per pound of load'. It doesn't simply scale up. Then we come to energy management. The thickness of the pan is part of the magic formula. To supply the extra heat now needed, you'd need to make it thicker (since you can't heat it hotter). But that also makes it slower to transfer out. Adjusting the design for that would impact it's ability to do what it now does so well (efficiently extract from tiny loads). I'm sure I'm not alone in the wish to not have that degraded?
OF
To me the very fact it's not easy to do, 'natural' if you will, points to something wrong. Or at least inappropriate. A better/different tool is indicated?
It's a fine balance. If you make the load bigger you change that. You upset the volume to surface ratio. There is 'less square feet of hot surface per pound of load'. It doesn't simply scale up. Then we come to energy management. The thickness of the pan is part of the magic formula. To supply the extra heat now needed, you'd need to make it thicker (since you can't heat it hotter). But that also makes it slower to transfer out. Adjusting the design for that would impact it's ability to do what it now does so well (efficiently extract from tiny loads). I'm sure I'm not alone in the wish to not have that degraded?
OF