That is true, however, I doubt that Cannabis “evolved” the ability to produce psychoactive chemicals as a result of contact with humans. We definitely increased the levels of such chemicals, with selective breeding and culling, but IMO, it’s more likely that they are produced to serve some other purpose (perhaps protection from consumption or from intense sunlight).
I'd prefer to not use theoretical terms such as evolution when discussing science, as I find loaded words like those quickly skew conversation.
Adaptation is the biological term. Selective breeding is a very... human-like form of isolating genes. Ironically similar to courtship?
That is true, however, I doubt that Cannabis “evolved” the ability to produce psychoactive chemicals as a
Also, if the chemicals are produced to entice mammals to consume the buds, it makes little sense that it has evolved to produce ones that require decarboxylation before becoming psychoactive. A plant that produces a pleasant sensation upon being eaten raw (i.e. sweet fruit) would be much more likely to have its seed spread by animals, than a plant that needs to be heated to temperatures that would destroy any of its living tissue.
LOL, nice to see you use my same decarboxlation reference you disagreed with in another thread!
Although if you look around you might notice, we aren't just any, regular, mammalian species, in fact our history and origin is entirely unknown! Are we even of this planet? And is cannabis?
NOBODY KNOWS!
Field leading anthropologists, archaeologists, and other experts still cannot explain the root cause of civilization. I find that fascinating!
Keep in mind that taste and other sensual perception greatly varies between species! The domesticated dog for example having entirely different abilities than us, despite some shared "mammalian" classifications. They have quite poor vision, comparatively, but incredible olfactory abilities. Some mammals are even adapted to live in the sea! Or fly! Or lay eggs!
Many carnivores for example, lack the taste receptors to actually taste the sweet fruit in your example. But other mammals do! My point being that these sensations and effects are not the same from species to species as your analogy suggests. Similar to how capsaicin in chili peppers works to fend off many mammals by producing an uncomfortable, irritable heat, but birds do not have this taste receptor, and thus are not effected.
]