Just to be clear, in case I implied otherwise: I didn't mean to suggest any kind of deficiency or superiority of either log in terms of heat-up performance! Furthermore, my comment about the Nano's heat-up time relative to the UD was purely
speculative. I should know better than to post things like that, as they tend to propagate on the Internet! But for my personal use style, pre-heating for 30 minutes or so isn't a problem.
In my mind, there are two distinct "stages" of heat-up progress with both the Nano and UD: (1) able to produce vapor, and (2) equilibrium.
A little background as to how I arrived at this observation: when I first got my E-Nano, I used it the way many suggest. That is, turn it to 10 (max heat) for 5ish minutes, then turn down to desired temp (6-7 for most people), wait another 2ish minutes, then start vaping. This works, and you can get decent vapor; this is what I call
stage 1, able to produce vapor. But what I found was that I'd get started with that process, then hang out for a while (maybe an hour or so, didn't really keep track of time) and decide I wanted to vape again. All the while, the Nano would have been left on my desired temp setting. But by this point, the whole unit itself was much warmer on the outside, and it
seemed to me that the heater itself was hotter, so I'd usually have to turn the dial down again, otherwise the material would char. This is what I call
stage 2, equilibrium.
I don't have the tools to measure these stages precisely, but I suspect that at stage 1, the log---as a whole system---is still changing fairly rapidly. The heater is hot enough to make vapor, but the rest of the unit is still changing. Stage 2 is where the rate of change of the whole log-system itself is zero (or effectively zero).
At least with the Nano, I found some vapor inconsistency between stage 1 and stage 2. And there were at least a few other people in the Nano thread making similar comments, along the lines of, "Yes, you can start vaping in under 10 minutes, but the best and most consistent results come after a good 20-30 minutes of heat up time."
Based on my experience with the Nano, when I got the UD, I had already established a 20+ minute preheat time for my vaping. In other words, I've never experienced a stage 1 with the UD.
So as far as the idea to test with a 15v LED dimmer: I appreciate the offer! I'm a bit hesitant to do the test though, mainly because I don't have precise
quantifiable definitions for stage 1 and stage 2. Also, since I don't
need a faster heat-up time, I'm hesitant to put the higher voltage wear and tear on my UD (though in the grand scheme of things a few times just for testing is probably negligible). Another problem is that whatever results I came up with would be specific to my particular logs, and the wood used for each. I'm pretty sure both stages are affected by the type of wood used. Lastly, I think Underdogs have a lot more overall variance in size and shape.
I don't have the equipment for this, but if you had one of those thermal imaging cameras, you could turn on both logs at the same time, then take a picture of both every time unit (say 10 seconds). Do this for say an hour. Then go back and look at a few key locations on each device and plot temperature over time. I would expect to see increasing temperatures on all points, though the
rate of increase would be different. And after enough time, all points should reach a steady-state temperature. Repeat for at least the most popular woods. Then repeat again playing with different voltage settings for both devices. That's a lot of time to do all that. Perfect is the enemy of good, so maybe there's a much simpler way to get most of this data?
Sorry to ramble! I can't help but geeking out with just about anything that comes into my hands. I'll have Linux running on my log vapes before long.
@underdog : If you want to borrow my Nano to test against, you're more than welcome!