grampa_herb
Epstein didn't kill himself
Shouldda sent Barkley instead of Rodman...
In a fit of angst, the USA outlawed our Fed government from assassinations....which, in the right circumstances (and I think N Korea is indeed one) is a legitimate arm of foreign policy.
IMO, a bullet in this little fat, homicidal fucker's brain pan would be WAY better than military action where countless lives will be lost or ruined.
If I were the Chinese, I might be considering this approach as they have this complete loose cannon of a maniac right on their border.
dissuasion from this kind of vile aggression
Its real simple, if your very lives are threatened, then you make the decision and fuck what anybody else thinks.Simple question: who decide who is worthed to be cold blood assassinated?
I was just watching I think it was the second disc of oliver stone's "The Untold History of the United States", and they mentioned that it was three million out of 30 so 10%. That's still a lot of dead koreansI read the other day that they lost 20% of their population in the Korean War.
Barkley talks better but rodman may be the smarter one. He was definitely the better rebounderShouldda sent Barkley instead of Rodman...
It was well-known that obama had a kill list, his unofficial nickname was 'drone assassin in chief'Simple question: who decide who is worthed to be cold blood assassinated? Trump staff? World citizens after some kind of open polls?
I, on the other hand, would oppose a coup. I prefer freedom where those who oppose Trump can start trying to win some elections to get what they want.The military have drills over on the Asian Peninsula on how they would take out Kim. I'm sure he hears all that and makes him more paranoid.
Then we have a president that says we will release fire and fury on N. Korea. Trump should shut up. Everyone should just ignore his ignorant and crazy tweets. Our voted lawmakers should just run the country along with the generals and side step Trump.
World citizens...really? Wow.
I read the other day that they lost 20% of their population in the Korean War.
So far we have 10%/3 million, or 20%/6 million. It could be that the casualties weren't all in war battles, or that the percentages are just from one korea or the other. I wasn't there, but here's a third opinion:Yep, LeMay was quoted in an interview as saying " We went over there and fought the war and eventually burned down every town in North Korea anyway, someway or another, and some in South Korea too.… Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — twenty percent of the population of Korea as direct casualties of war, or from starvation and exposure?" One of the reasons (of many) this shit is still going on.
I keep in mind that what we know about n k we mostly know from the same informative channel of "saddam weapons of mass distruction" (a lie told knowing to tell a lie) / not very accurate at best..
So far we have 10%/3 million, or 20%/6 million. It could be that the casualties weren't all in war battles, or that the percentages are just from one korea or the other. I wasn't there, but here's a third opinion:
Does anyone believe something is not going down?
I think something bad is going to happen.
...so we have a voice in all this.
Just dislike easy killing talk