I'm hijacking the thread yet you have made two posts that have nothing to do with the vape.....
I posted a single question about whether or not they could offer us the batteries at wholesale and then started to get responses from people who have NO affiliation with the company as to why they can't do it. All I'm waiting for is a simple yes or no from the Makers of TV who read this forum, yet there are about 5 or 6 people who think they are responsible for answering a question that they physically can't answer.
I'm a bit confused at this point. Am I one of the "people who have NO affiliation with the company" (I've been accused of being a secretly paid shill you know.....) or am I one of the "about 5 or 6 people who think they are responsible for answering a question that they physically can't answer"? I can't be both I think?
I'm not sure it really matters, since I don't think either is true, but I'd like to know which camp of enemy I'm in? I really don't have a secret agenda here, I don't work for TV or THC, although both have asked me to test their gear for them. If you check, you'll find positive and negative observations and comments from me to each. But even if it were true, what difference would it really make? Ideas should have standing on their own. Shouting and name calling avoid responding to the uncomfortable questions sometimes......
As Jam has said, perhaps the problem is some of us don't agree with you and that's not sitting well?
There's a difference between discussing and derailing. I thought on a forum full of adults the "@Tim" would make it clear I'm phrasing my question for him.
Agreed. A big difference. The gentle readers of this forum are once again encouraged to review the information and decide who's trying to help and who's got a different agenda in play. I assume folks know our opinions there, no real need to repeat them again. And again. And again.
It's already been said that a pubic question on this forum is an invitation for others to participate, not an opportunity for a 'bully pulpit". I feel folks (myself included) properly give their views. As a bit of unsolicited advice, you might want to reconsider bringing who's behaving in an adult manner and who's not into the discussion?
I remain of the opinion that you (or anyone else) asking a question does not compel anyone (like Tim) to answer it. "When did you stop beating your wife?" kind of stuff included. It's their business model, their decision. Wanting them to sell stuff at low prices is normal of course, but I still don't think it's any more realistic than GM selling new Firestone tires cheaper than Big O. Perhaps they could (although they could have a fair price agreement in play, same as TV might?), but IMO it's not realistic to expect....yes they could perhaps if they wanted to for another reason (that made economic sense with their model) but they didn't go into business to sell tires any more than TV did to be batter vendors. Avoiding the issue doesn't make it go away, either.
As always, asking a question like that and not having it answered leaves the reader wondering if there is no good answer or it's just plain 'none of your business'. I think we all have our opinions there, or will form them as needed?
OF