Does anyone have some insider info on the part number for the momentary switch that's in the cera. I've got an idea on a side on/off momentary switch, just need to to find a similar latching switch for the bottom.
I would hope anyone with "insider information" would honor their NDA, for sure if I had such info I would.
What I believe happened is the original Beta switches (of which I have one) were a few samples of what's basically a semi custom switch needing special parts from overseas (France? Germany?) that put a serious crimp in delivery. For all I know this one might be short lived like the first momentary ones turned out to be (that was of course part of the Beta Test). I'm not using it much these days since there's no compelling need and I'm testing my own version when not using the momentary.
The specs needed are simple to relate, but not at all easy to find. Even if you remove the 'Made in USA' filter TV uses. To fit the existing tail cap it has to fit the standard 19mm thread hole. For instance, from the 2000 or so push button switches Digikey sells these will fit mechanically:
http://www.digikey.com/scripts/dksearch/dksus.dll?FV=fff40011,fff80061,108078a,c3c013a&k=push button switch&vendor=0&mnonly=0&newproducts=0&ptm=0&fid=0&quantity=0&PV545=56
Notice, however, none of them carries enough DC current nor are any latching.
OF I'm a little curious as to why you dropped your strong stance on the latching switch a little while back. I completely agree with everything you say here but I just don't understand why this has become a non-issue for you know?
Also I guess Pak's old-age experience was right in regards to the late beta test meaning a late product release...
Well I guess two things happened, fairly close together IIRC. First two guys I loaned the Beta unit used the latching switch to have
total of 3 accidents (over maybe 10 or 12 days use?). Dumping the full load of oil all over the joint was never a design goal I was aware of. Beta testing often finds such problems, sometimes right off, sometimes it take a little while. It makes sense with LL but is kinda dangerous as is for oil and there's no way to interlock it to prevent that (at least that I can see). Secondly, TV announced their plan to put the project on hold, that is they no longer planned to ship one.
To me that ended one phase of it. It's in end user hands now. Several folks, myself included, are looking at options that solve issues without creating others.
As to Pak's guess about timing, believe what you want. But,
since I was there when the Beta test schedule was laid out don't waste your time trying to change my mind about the original timing would be my advice. From the start Beta testing was to be short and intense.....they had this strange feeling folks wouldn't want to wait any longer than necessary to get one. Who'da guessed. Believe it or not it really did play out like it was related to you here, the problems and delays were real and generally for the reasons most accept. IMO nothing really out of the ordinary, in fact way way way better than say the Cloud or various D9 projects are going? Just my opinion, of course, we all get 'em you know.
OF