Happy Dart user here
Hopefully TET is working on an adapter to fit the CEO to larger sized 510 type battery wands (e.g. designed for 18650/18350). If they are not, not sure who could be. My CEO order would be in if such an adapter existed.
OF thanks for the picture of your CEO adapter invention 'Dart on steroids' a few pages back. IIRC you did mention earlier that someone would produce the adapter, nice work and very functional. Is that a UFO type mouthpiece inserted at the end of the CEO? Do you think a regular Dart and its std mp would also fit in the CEO?
First off, Howdy! Welcome to the fun. I don't mean to start out with a quibble with the new guy, but IMO all DART users are happy DART users.....or their technique or extract need work.....
I hope TV gets interesting in quickly producing adapters, but being a Capitalist at heart I'm confident the idea is so useful demand will make adapters happen if it's realistic. I'm sure you're not alone, IMO if they made adapters they'd sell a bunch of Cera carts to go with them.
You're welcome for the photo. I very seldom post photos (note the grief my bud Stu rushed to pile on......and the number of 'likes' he got for it......). In fact it took me months to finally get around to repairing the dead computer that was keeping the password for Imageshack from me. But the idea is too cool to keep to yourself (and it works so well it turns out). Just holding it makes guys faces light up.
No, that's a standard drip tip there (large bore even). No oil issues in the airpath. I think there's enough room in there for the stand alone UFO (I'll try to remember to ask Tim next time I'm in), but the normal DART tip is going to be too long, the cavity is not very deep.
Unfortunately, I am a lawyer. Blech.
Click-through terms are generally held to be enforceable.
The risk comes from non-customers suing (those who aren't bound to the waiver).
IMO, at the end of the day, the design change probably does not substantively reduce the risk of injury, so i'd rather see them focus on making a product that people want to buy.
Nothing really wrong with Lawyers as a group (any more than any group of folks I guess?), it's what the individuals do. It's hard to find fault with a guy giving free legal support to low income tenants trying to get decent living conditions from big city Slum Lords (as the son of a good friend actually does).....others I can pass on.
Otherwise, I agree. Click throughs are more useful than box top licenses but the rub comes from proving the other fellow read and agreed (not all will have as you point out). A guy in a 'set up' is sure to be in that group. And as you know, juries are always a roll of the dice in a game where the stakes are high indeed (for one party). Best avoided.
I agree it does not reduce risks much (hey, they were almost non existent before....) but that's not the point is it? Isn't the point that 'you knew that assembly was a risk to my innocent client (what other kind is there?) and yet you......' is the real danger we're trying to avoid here? I'm not sure, but that's my guess.
I agree, focus on the product we want to buy is the highest goal. IMO that's exactly what TV did. They listened to all our wishes, went away, and made it all happen. We got everything on the list we asked for near as I can tell? Nobody I know asked for two switches, we wanted latching and were not bashful about it. I'm confident we'll ultimately get that latching part too.
Perhaps if demand is big enough, supply will once again rise to fill it?
Thanks for the thoughts.
To simply put it it seems to make more sense to put it in to use it and keep it out when not using it.
My thought as well, but that requires a stop for the battery (otherwise the spring pushes it up and contact is made). That happened with the slide because there's an insulating shoulder on the shaft (which of course isn't there if removed). And it reopens the 'flat top/button top' deal all over. Flat tops don't work. The insulating pin allows for both flat and button top batteries.
Also there was some chatter about that being basically a key then and loosing the key would prevent use unlike the alternative which still allows you to use it.
OF