Discontinued The Woodeez Vaporizer/Diffuser

steiner666

Serial vapist
Yeah I, like a lot of ppl, ended up putting a screen down in above the bar in the heater opening to prevent stuff from falling it. I mean you dont really have to worrya bout it if you hold the wdz horizontal or kinda tilted bottoms up a bit, or if you just start sucking before you put the stem in and remove stem just before you stop, but, lets face it, we vapists can be forgetful around the time that we're using these vapes ;) so i like to kinda idiot-proof the experience to avoid any possible fuckups, and screen is a must for that.

and i didnt really mean that you have to wax it before you use it or anything, it just looks and smells great after you do. i assumed mine was waxed before it was shipped to me but a couple weeks later i put some wax on it and it looked way better than when i got it, so i guess they arent waxed beforehand. It just gives it this nice dull glow, and like i said, smell.
 
steiner666,

ioright

Cloud Connoisseur
My WDZ was shipped out last Monday, I can't wait till it gets here! Unfortunately shipping isn't an exact science across the border and I have no idea when I will get my newest toy :(

Oh well, I sure hope it is worth the wait!
 
ioright,
I wonder if the Woodeez conserves as much herb as the MFLB.
Given it's a table top, I expect the WZ also gives thicker hits. However, Finchrock says its just like his MFLB.

Theres hardly any info on overseas shipping on the WZ website. Particularly if any duty needs to be paid or anything.

Also, the $20 transformer isn't under the 1 year warranty. How long will the transformer last? Years? In which case theres nothing to worry about.
 
Vapemania-original,

nuvap

85% Sativa / 15% Indica
Vapemania said:
I wonder if the Woodeez conserves as much herb as the MFLB.
Given it's a table top, I expect the WZ also gives thicker hits. However, Finchrock says its just like his MFLB.

Theres hardly any info on overseas shipping on the WZ website. Particularly if any duty needs to be paid or anything.

Also, the $20 transformer isn't under the 1 year warranty. How long will the transformer last? Years? In which case theres nothing to worry about.
A packed log vape stem uses about a third to half of a MFLB trench worth, they are pretty damn efficient.

As for duties; I paid about 35 in import duties to get my PD in to the UK.

When I was looking in to buying a log vape I contacted Woodeez about shipping to UK but didn't get any reply from them, which was odd because everyone else says they reply quite quickly, so I assumed they didn't want to ship internationally. Shame really because I have a few friends who would love to buy a log vape after seeing my PD but sadly non of the makers ship to UK these days, that I know of at least.
 
nuvap,
Yeah, the WZ website is a little twitchy too.

Nice collection of vapes, nuvap.

Hold onto your PDP. May become a collectors item in the future. All the log vapes seem to be hand-made with limited supply.

Am thinking of getting a friend from the US to buy a PD and they can ship it over to UK for me. Should be worth gold dust in UK by vape connoisseurs.
 
Vapemania-original,

mrfloopa

Vappy
Well, I guess I should toss in a bit of a review after having my unit for a few days. I'll probably keep editing this post as I think of a few more things, but since most information is already available (and everything good about this product is true) I'll focus on questions I had when looking into which log vape to buy.

Aesthetically, the thing is beautiful. I love having a wooden vaporizer ever-ready where I work and play. Of course, there are a few rough patches in the wood, but that is expected because the carve goes against the grain when it curves. Nothing that use and waxing won't eventually fix. The black walnut is very nice, and mine has a little waterfall as some others posted on here.

My main worries after buying were 1) quality of the product, and 2) efficiency. This thing is darn efficient, and just one stem get's me to a nice place. Hard to imagine being content with .025 a gram, but that part is entirely true. I am a firm believer in getting the most out of your herb, so I also don't take huge hits. After all, if vaping is almost pure THC, that means visible vapor is a bunch of wasted THC. I don't use my WDZ for giant hits anymore, but the ones I have tried had no problem keeping up, and were pretty darn decent hits for the amount of vapor. I got about 4 or 5 decent hits with visible vapor still coming out, and after that I continue for the heck of it in case there is more vapor, just not visible on the way out. The herb is mostly browned evenly, but if you leave your stem sitting on the heating element, the bottom might be a little bit more brown. I also love the small hit method that this allows for, because there is nothing like feeling the climb to where you want to be, and with this you can really enjoy that climb.

As for negatives, there really aren't any. Nothing against the product, but the following are just some things I noticed. I love the product, I would gladly buy again and recommend it, these are just small things I've noticed. :2c:

1) The wood at the very bottom of the base is kinda chipped. It looks like very tiny pieces flaked off during the time the block of wood it was made from was cut to size after it was shaped. Not a major problem, but it might bother some people with OCD. Keep in mind, all log vapes are hand made, and these kinds of quirks are normal, and fine. I would not trade my Woodeez for anybody else's.

2) There is no screen. Really, it isn't a problem to turn this thing over and knock on the bottom or shake it, but it is a hassle to deal with if stuff falls in, because it makes a very strange smell. Not like combustion, just weird. A screen can easily be inserted, but I don't know why they aren't a bit more standard. Not a big deal, just a small annoyance that is easily remedied.

3) I am not sure why this happened or if it is common, but after having my WDZ on for the past 4 or 5 days, and banging herb out of inside of it, the unit started making a high-pitched springy noise. I have no idea how to describe it, but it seems like when I set it down on a hard surface, or it bumps the wall when I set it down, or I have to knock herb out, something in the unit vibrates very quickly, making that springy noise. Maybe the wood expanded with the heat, and the extra room now allows stuff inside to vibrate a bit? I wouldn't describe it as anything loose. If anything, it is the only kind of vibration I wouldn't mind hearing, because it seems like everything is still operating the way it should be, and the vibration is a contrived, springy noise, not a rattling. I would like to know if anybody else has had that problem.
 
mrfloopa,

steiner666

Serial vapist
Vapemania said:
I wonder if the Woodeez conserves as much herb as the MFLB.
Given it's a table top, I expect the WZ also gives thicker hits. However, Finchrock says its just like his MFLB.

Theres hardly any info on overseas shipping on the WZ website. Particularly if any duty needs to be paid or anything.

Also, the $20 transformer isn't under the 1 year warranty. How long will the transformer last? Years? In which case theres nothing to worry about.

I load my MFLB 1/2 full trenches, and that = out to about 2 stems. So yeah its uses less than a LB. I've tried a stems worth in the LB and it just wasnt as satisfying as the same amount out of the wdz.

As far as hit density, it depends on a lot of things. Individual units vary slightly in internal temp, then theres the factors like how long its been plugged in for, what the ambient temp of the room is, how dry your herb is, how finely ground it is, and, biggest factor of all IMO, how high of quality the herb is. I'll just say that i'm satisfied with the hits the wdz gives me when i load it with some high quality herb, but I'll always reach for the HA when i h ave anything of lesser quality.

The good news is that you'll be able to afford to buy the expensive herb, since you'll be using so little of it, and it will still cost less than vaping larger amounts of mids in another vape, more than likely.

And the transformers are supposed to be some of the better quality ones, but, as with any electronic device, they can go bad suddenly and without and good reason. Mine died less than a month after i got it, but it was promptly replaced for free, even tho its not under warranty. In your case, i'd recommend ordering a spare while you're at it, just in case.

mrfloopa said:
2) There is no screen. Really, it isn't a problem to turn this thing over and knock on the bottom or shake it, but it is a hassle to deal with if stuff falls in, because it makes a very strange smell. Not like combustion, just weird. A screen can easily be inserted, but I don't know why they aren't a bit more standard. Not a big deal, just a small annoyance that is easily remedied.

I totally agree. I know they arent necessary, but they sure do make life a lot more worry-free and keep things smelling better. I think a screen in there should be an option when you're ordering.

mrfloopa said:
3) I am not sure why this happened or if it is common, but after having my WDZ on for the past 4 or 5 days, and banging herb out of inside of it, the unit started making a high-pitched springy noise. I have no idea how to describe it, but it seems like when I set it down on a hard surface, or it bumps the wall when I set it down, or I have to knock herb out, something in the unit vibrates very quickly, making that springy noise. Maybe the wood expanded with the heat, and the extra room now allows stuff inside to vibrate a bit? I wouldn't describe it as anything loose. If anything, it is the only kind of vibration I wouldn't mind hearing, because it seems like everything is still operating the way it should be, and the vibration is a contrived, springy noise, not a rattling. I would like to know if anybody else has had that problem.

Mine doesnt make any noise when i move it around. I have never had to shake or bang herb out of it tho cause i put the screen in first day i got it. My dog did walk through the cord while it was dangling over the side of my desk and pull the wdz off and down onto the floor, but its carpeted and was fine.
 
steiner666,

finchrock24

Proud MMJ Patient
Vapemania said:
I wonder if the Woodeez conserves as much herb as the MFLB.
Given it's a table top, I expect the WZ also gives thicker hits. However, Finchrock says its just like his MFLB.

Theres hardly any info on overseas shipping on the WZ website. Particularly if any duty needs to be paid or anything.

Also, the $20 transformer isn't under the 1 year warranty. How long will the transformer last? Years? In which case theres nothing to worry about.

The WDZ is like a LB on steriods. It does give bigger, more consistent hits but it doesn't give clouds like an EQ, DBV, SSV, etc.
 
finchrock24,
Great posts Steiner and mrfloopa, thanks for the valuable advice.

Gonna start saving for the WZ. It seems to be a wise choice.
Seems to do well in : economy (herbs and price), efficiency (no question about the hits), health (convection heating from ceramic), design (walnut wood, natural, tactile), and reliability (hell, even the owner has a thread on this website).
Oh, its the only log vape I can get, being overseas.

Some people are talking of the VX Cloud and the Vape-Or-Smoke.
I can't buy all three.

Suppose I'll have to read the reviews on the others whilst toking on my WZ :brow:

Edit: Nice collection of vapes Finchrock
 
Vapemania-original,

mrfloopa

Vappy
Vapemania said:
Some people are talking of the VX Cloud and the Vape-Or-Smoke.
I can't buy all three.

It is definitely better to start off with the vaporizer that will help you save the most for your next purchase. But honestly, depending on your habits, you may find that you really don't need anything else. I may only have an EZ Vape, but even if I were to have a name brand one such as Da Buddha, SSV, VXC, etc, I really can't see myself using it anymore. I may end up using it on rare occasions if I want to revape some used material for a sleepy high, but that is it. And I would rather make stronger edibles. :brow: -> :ko:
(If you combust, that is also a possibility for afterwards. I tried it at my SO's request, and it was definitely a lot more harsh. Just something to keep in mind.)

The only other really legitimate and needed use from another vape would be a party-style for multiple friends who want huge hits. For personal use, I think you'll be pretty content with this. You're definitely in for a treat.
 
mrfloopa,

nuvap

85% Sativa / 15% Indica
Vapemania said:
Oh, its the only log vape I can get, being overseas.
Did you get a reply back and confirmation they will ship to the UK? I'd be interested to know if you did, as I have friends chomping on the bit to get a log vape in the UK.
 
nuvap,
Sorry, nuvap, haven't emailed them.

Hopefully there will be a reply from the WZ owner on this thread.

Anyone else recently purchased a WZ from overseas?

Edit: For us UK folks, it's 90 ($146) for a WZ (if you can get it) or 160 ($261) for a HA.
Looks like we're having to spend far more money for vaping than the US cousins.
The DBV is also 140 ($228), but it doesn't make the herb last like the above 2 devices, I believe.
 
Vapemania-original,

combusche

Well-Known Member
does anybody else have an issue with using woodeez with a bong? i bought one to replace my aromazap about 6 months ago, and i have had it plugged in 24/7 for 6 months. it still isn't hot enough to draw a nice thick vapor cloud like with aromazap. i haven't been using it at all, just leaving it plugged in to break it in, but i think it's ridiculous that it's been 6 months and still, unusable with a bong. is the solution just higher voltage?

also, let me clarify what i mean by "unusable with a bong": i use my log vapes with a 250ml EHLE straight tube. with the aromazap, every stem gives me a very nice thick vapor cloud. with the woodeez, the temperature just isn't high enough so i usually end up getting a very light mist that tastes good (depending on strain obviously) but just isn't nowhere near even 50% of the thickness of my zap.

in addition, both are using the same voltage plugs - the stock ones they came with - 12v.

what could be the issue? has anybody else had success with the situation i am in? currently i'm still using my trusty old aromazap and it still works great, but i'd like to feel like i bought the woodeez for something.
 
combusche,

guardian

Well-Known Member
just a stoned thought :ko: try using the glue part of a rolling paper cut it off with sccisors lighly wet it and wrap it around the stem tip where it inserts in the heatport for a tighter fit , the paper shouldnt burn at the temps produced and u may need more then one strip cuz there generally thin , but mayby try it and report? dont have a wdz yet but i hear theres a bit of wiggle between the stem tip and the heatport, any vapor hits a good hit :lol:
 
guardian,

finchrock24

Proud MMJ Patient
combusche said:
does anybody else have an issue with using woodeez with a bong? i bought one to replace my aromazap about 6 months ago, and i have had it plugged in 24/7 for 6 months. it still isn't hot enough to draw a nice thick vapor cloud like with aromazap. i haven't been using it at all, just leaving it plugged in to break it in, but i think it's ridiculous that it's been 6 months and still, unusable with a bong. is the solution just higher voltage?

also, let me clarify what i mean by "unusable with a bong": i use my log vapes with a 250ml EHLE straight tube. with the aromazap, every stem gives me a very nice thick vapor cloud. with the woodeez, the temperature just isn't high enough so i usually end up getting a very light mist that tastes good (depending on strain obviously) but just isn't nowhere near even 50% of the thickness of my zap.

in addition, both are using the same voltage plugs - the stock ones they came with - 12v.

what could be the issue? has anybody else had success with the situation i am in? currently i'm still using my trusty old aromazap and it still works great, but i'd like to feel like i bought the woodeez for something.


I also was disappointed in the bong hit quality through the WDZ. This is the only area where this cape doesn't shine IMO. No matter how fine I grind up the herb or how dry it is...I just can't get a good milk hit. The vapor tube gets very milkey but I can get thicker clouds through a straight inhale then I can through my little 12" straight tube. I abandoned the idea using it with a binger after about the 3rd or 4th attempt. I still have my EQ and Vapobowl to use with my glass though, so I am not worried.

EDIT: guardian, you bring up a very clever idea. There is a pretty significant amount of wiggle room at the connection spot. I will shim it up with some paper and maybe a tighter fit can improve things.

EDIT 2: Seems to help a bit. The clouds were more satisfying then before. However, I am using very good herbs. I will do a little more scientific test later when I get more time. I'll load up a stock stem and a shimmed stem with the same amount and strain and take one right after the other and see what, if any, difference there is.
 
finchrock24,

combusche

Well-Known Member
just tried making a tighter fit, still failed. it appears that the problem is simply not enough heat that passes through the herb, which is really weird because the wood (which has been running 24/7) is in fact much hotter than my aromazap, which also runs 24/7.

i think the zap's 6-hole construct is much better for the purpose of hitting it through a bong, the 2 holes for woodeez perhaps just cannot provide enough air flow. very disappointing purchase.
 
combusche,

lwien

Well-Known Member
combusche said:
i think the zap's 6-hole construct is much better for the purpose of hitting it through a bong, the 2 holes for woodeez perhaps just cannot provide enough air flow. very disappointing purchase.

2 holes is not the problem. The PD only has 2 holes also and there are many PD users including myself, who have been getting GREAT bong performance for years now.
 
lwien,

steiner666

Serial vapist
Try leaving the stem in the heaterport (if you put a screen in it at least) for a bit before taking your hit. i find this helps makes them thicker, seems the little bit of conduction through the steel helps maintain higher temps - I think the zaps tight-fitting stem, and leave-it-in-til-done style, has more to do with its performance than the # of airholes. i usually dont leave it in for the first 2-3 hits, so that they're not too thick, but i do it for the last couple hits so that theyre more satisfying and get some higher temp comps.

My friends zap runs hotter than my wdz, gives thicker but fewer hits. Using the leaving-stem-in technique with the wdz tho, they're both able to vape stuff to about the same level of doneness tho.

*edit* i think putting a wedge around to tighten the stem fitting a bit would probably help, but ideally it would be some sort of conductive material, like metal, so that that little bit of conduction can come into play.
 
steiner666,

lwien

Well-Known Member
^^ Good advice. While I never leave my stem in between hits, I do let them sit in the heat exchanger for about 6 to 8 seconds before I hit it.
 
lwien,

combusche

Well-Known Member
while leaving the stem in the heating component prior to hitting it helps - for both zap and woodeez - my point is that it just pales in comparison to the zap for the purpose of hitting it through a bong.

the reason for my conclusion, is that since they're both built similarly in design and functionality, the zap's ability to immediately extract a thick cloud from the stem regardless of whether you warm it up or not makes the woodeez's inability to do so seem like a major handicap. i do not hit the log vapes other than through ice cold water in the bong because i much prefer cold vapor, so my woodeez unit is basically just sitting there and doing nothing now. perhaps i might give a stronger voltage a try.

the wedge thing also did not help significantly. yes the vapor cloud is thicker when the fit is tight - i made it almost as tight as the zap's, as well as tigher than the zap's - but the max cloud i can achieve still looks only like the first second of a 5-second zap hit, if that isn't too confusing.

regardless of its effectiveness as a standalone unit (direct toking from stem), i have to say this was personally a horrible replacement unit for the zap - i shoulda just got another zap to replace an older zap.
 
combusche,

jeffp

psychonaut/retired
Also let's not sweep under the mat the fact that the woodeez is an unauthorized copy of the PD to attract people who didn't want to wait in line to get one.
That said, what did you expect?
 
jeffp,

mrfloopa

Vappy
combusche said:
rdless of its effectiveness as a standalone unit (direct toking from stem), i have to say this was personally a horrible replacement unit for the zap - i shoulda just got another zap to replace an older zap.

No offense, but I find this really hard to believe. The clouds I can get through my WDZ are thick as hell, and I have no complaints about bong hits. Considering there is variation within units of the same model, I really don't think it is fair to generalize about the Woodeez just because you cannot get a satisfactory bong hit. Especially since the point of the unit is not to get bong hits in the first place. The point is efficiency, and as is often stated, after running it for a while or leaving the stem on the unit, all 3 models extract roughly the same amount of vapor and all are designed to operate at almost exactly the same temp (as much as it can be controlled--the type of wood allows for small variations that can be fixed with a coaster or a warm-up time). If you are having trouble getting a huge, thick, cloud, the problem could be you. Or that you just need to take an extra bong hit, which shouldn't be that hard to do. And if it is a replacement for your zap, you could just be glorifying your old unit. Memory isn't the most reliable thing, and it is very, very easy for it to falter and mis-remember even what you are most sure about. Especially if you were very fond of your zap.
 
mrfloopa,

reece

Well-Known Member
Could the problem be that particular unit? Have you contacted the manufacturer?
 
reece,

finchrock24

Proud MMJ Patient
mrfloopa said:
No offense, but I find this really hard to believe. The clouds I can get through my WDZ are thick as hell, and I have no complaints about bong hits. Considering there is variation within units of the same model, I really don't think it is fair to generalize about the Woodeez just because you cannot get a satisfactory bong hit. Especially since the point of the unit is not to get bong hits in the first place. The point is efficiency, and as is often stated, after running it for a while or leaving the stem on the unit, all 3 models extract roughly the same amount of vapor and all are designed to operate at almost exactly the same temp (as much as it can be controlled--the type of wood allows for small variations that can be fixed with a coaster or a warm-up time). If you are having trouble getting a huge, thick, cloud, the problem could be you. Or that you just need to take an extra bong hit, which shouldn't be that hard to do. And if it is a replacement for your zap, you could just be glorifying your old unit. Memory isn't the most reliable thing, and it is very, very easy for it to falter and mis-remember even what you are most sure about. Especially if you were very fond of your zap.

Good post and you make a very valid argument. If people want to use a vape through a bong, look at the VXC or vapo bowl or something that was DESGINED to go through glass. Sure, the WDZ can go through glass but I wouldn't expect it to hit nearly as hard as something designed to be hooked up to glass.

My WDZ is my HARDEST hitting vape when I use it as intended (direct draw).
 
finchrock24,
Top Bottom