This has been my experience with portable ball vapes, also using the Stunner as a reference. I would say the reasons to clean there might be:Can't see why any vapour would pass over the balls. So they wouldn't get dirty from general use.
At best small pieces of material might get through the screen and get Into the balls. If so it would take a while to build up to where it's even worth thinking about.
If the balls need cleaning I imagine it will be twice a year kind of job if at all
That's exactly my experience.I've never had an issue with needing to clean the balls with my TA, occasionally had to brush off a little material from the screen holding the balls in but that's it.
I’ll try to remember to make a video with boro as well around the end of next week.
Yeah we do know what balls are used. It's all covered in depth in this thread already. The default is boro, other materials available if wanted. Further info can be obtained by going back 2 or 3 pages...from what I see in the Ball Vape Groups, most prefer and use Ruby Balls, as they seem to perform best overall other materials, what is the Tempest using for balls? hopefully its Red Ruby balls, btw this is not my opinion this is again what is proven to work best after ball vape community vigorously testing this already. anyone know what type of balls Tempest is using, thanks in advance
It could do more hits but I finished it too quickly@Brenyo seems like it gives a few less hits but works well.
Do you notice a different flavor?
Do you know how much time last to heat up and cool down in comparison of the zirconia balls?
Do you like pears?
Do you thing a changing of balls would affect the disk calibration? (I see people who want to use zirconia balls)
7s for better heat retention is nothing. Thought it would be a much bigger trade off.It could do more hits but I finished it too quickly
The zirconia has a slightly cleaner taste, a few people can taste the glass but it’s very minimal.
With the wand it takes about 7 seconds more to heat up with the zirc. The boro cap is 7.9g, ruby 9.1g, zirc 10.6g with 2.5mm balls.
Yes
Yes, but not by a lot.
I'm all about heat retention and taste too. The Stunner I own uses uses zirconia beads and it's my favorite cigarette style vape right now as it preserves taste and holds heat for multiple draws. Truly the blunt-style vaping experience I was looking for.7s for better heat retention is nothing. Thought it would be a much bigger trade off.
Think I'll be putting Zirc in day one
are you going to have different caps for Tempest, one for boro, ruby, zirc? sorry if i understood this wrongThe boro cap is 7.9g, ruby 9.1g, zirc 10.6g with 2.5mm balls.
Would be better when you can change the balls your self…are you going to have different caps for Tempest, one for boro, ruby, zirc? sorry if i understood this wrong
have you tested the tempest with ruby's?
either way I am looking forward to buying Tempest once its ready, thanks for your time @Brenyo
we appreciate all your hard work brother!
No, it can be replaced and the balls will be available separately.are you going to have different caps for Tempest, one for boro, ruby, zirc?
Yes, it's similar to boro in this setup imo, but both will be available. Zirc makes a more noticeable difference.have you tested the tempest with ruby's?
Yeah I know, both of the indicators were early.I think the only thing you need to avoid is having a large amount of users who have to go past the visual indicator max to get the roast they want.
yes of course you may change the balls your self lolWould be better when you can change the balls your self…
Will the Zirc and Ruby balls also be available at EU resellers? (verdampftnochmal, lacentralevapeur)it can be replaced and the balls will be available separately
I have the same question, maybe I'm in the minority but I envision temp stepping through 2 heat cycles and I'd love to know that "low" on the visual indicator is a low-temp extraction with a 4-5 hit thermal capacity@Brenyo When using for low temp hits, can the device maintain the extraction throughout the hit?
Don't know if I'm phrasing this well. I'm worried a low temp hit will start with good extraction, but mid hit the temp of the balls might drop enough to stop extraction before the hit is finished.
This isn't a deal breaker for me either way, but I'm interested to know.
Yes it can and you can control the temp with the draw speed. The heat builds up quickly and then drops slowly, you should be able to finish the bowl no problem. What I consider low temp on the left (about 5 short hits) and medium roast on the right (about 7 short hits). The picture is not the best, hard to see the difference unfortunately.@Brenyo When using for low temp hits, can the device maintain the extraction throughout the hit?
Don't know if I'm phrasing this well. I'm worried a low temp hit will start with good extraction, but mid hit the temp of the balls might drop enough to stop extraction before the hit is finished.
This isn't a deal breaker for me either way, but I'm interested to know.
If they order it, yes - I'd say it's very likely.Will the Zirc and Ruby balls also be available at EU resellers? (verdampftnochmal, lacentralevapeur)
I'm absolutely going to do the same. For me it's a big strength of the visual indicator. After first cycle we can just go again. Second cycle will require less heat up.I have the same question, maybe I'm in the minority but I envision temp stepping through 2 heat cycles and I'd love to know that "low" on the visual indicator is a low-temp extraction with a 4-5 hit thermal capacity
Does that mean i could just get a bowl/cap and it'll fit on my MVS Simrell stem? Will the cooling be sufficient with it?Yes, it's an 8mm connection like the DVs.