Hi Herby,
FWIW, my understanding is as follows:
There is simply no way (under normal herb or concentrate usage) for reclaim to build up anywhere except in the glass stem.
The load is in the stem, hot air leaves the heater and only produces vapor, and therefore claim, after it has passed through the load.
The only thing vapor/claim can touch after the load is the inside of the glass stem.
So no claim can form anywhere else, period.
Even if you were to blow into the vape the air you would be blowing into the device would be from your mouth/lungs and therefore too cool to produce vapor from the load, therefore no claim is possible in this situation.
You'd simply be pushing hot air off the heater, and out he air intake without it passing through the load (again no vapor can be produced, therefore no possibility of claim).
I really believe you can rest easy regarding claim buildup.
The only possible caveat here is if a very large load of concentrate was used with minimal wick/screen material to hold it.
It would be possible for concentrate to drip down on to the heater screen in this case, but the screen is so fine that I can't imagine any concentrate making its way through to the heater.
If the heater is hot enough to melt the concentrate, then it will be hot enough to evap' any that has dripped on to the heater screen anyway.
Any convection vape used with concentrates has this 'issue' too though, it's simple to avoid.
Even this caveat is moot if the unit is used upside down.
I have ZERO claim anywhere but the inside of my stem, seriously, none at all.
Regarding #2, I do believe that there may be some small differences in manufacturing tolerances in the early units like mine, and it would be better for RBT customers if these were minimized (which they may already be, I don't know) as I agree that it would make purchase of aftermarket stems and adapters easier for us.
As long as aftermarket stems are 22mm or under though, I can't see much of a problem.
#3:
I totally understand why you would want to be sure you aren't vaping any glue by-products, but if a Milaana has been manufactured as intended (i.e. glue is located only in it's intended location) I really can't see why it would be a problem.
The presence of glue in the vapor path (as distinct to the air path) is non-existent, it only appears in a relatively cool area of the vape.
Even if you take a series of huge rips and immediately check the temperature of the female GonG you'll feel that it's surprisingly cool.
Very little heat escapes to where it's not wanted.
I don't believe that the tiny surface area of glue (which is not subjected to high heat in even the heaviest use that I have put it to) presents any real risk at all.
Cool air being pulled past a truly tiny surface area of high temp' glue doesn't worry me in the slightest, but I can understand that others might feel differently, and I can further understand the desire to eliminate glue from the design completely.
I respect that difference, but don't feel this is a deal breaker for me.
I would however happily pay a small premium to have a mechanically secured female GonG, but this would just be to make replacement of the glass easier (and to allow those with glue concerns to rest easy I suppose).
I honestly think that you'd be less concerned once you had a Milaana in hand, it really is well thought out.
In terms of material safety/taste/function it really is better than any other vape I have tried so far (except my Vapcap, which is a very different kettle of fish), and I urge you to give it a go despite your worries.
I'm not saying that other vapes that have the potential to be even healthier don't exist, but I have seen none that have the benefits that the Mi brings to the table.
I'm not trying to be argumentative or dismissive, I swear, just my
I too insist on HEALTHY ways of vaping, and I can't get enough of my Milaana