Hi Haywood,
I especially admire your willingness to experiment and your honesty in reporting your found results in such clear and informative detail. Your feedback has been of excellent quality and very helpful.
Haywood said:
...simple mistake I was making (using a mostly dead battery half the time)...
...only expect a bowlful or so per battery...
Yes, this can accout for a lot, and we are agreed that
many people will make the same mistake.
It is expected since many first time users will want to 'get going' right away and so never read the directions. Others, because they will think/want/hope that they can get more from a single battery (perhaps they only have one with them). In either case, we understand.
As some readers may know already, the preferred mode of usage is to have thicker hits. Therefore, more material must be heated faster for this to occur -- which means more power consumed quicker, (at least in comparison with the Launch Tube). We have already made the device as nearly perfectly energy efficient as the physics and materials allow, so it is unlikely that the 'one battery per bowl' situation is going change anytime soon (for the Box).
You also note correctly that it is important to NOT let the batteries get too hot. It is ok for them to get warm (when charging or in use), but hot is not good -- it shortens the life of the battery. ("Hot" is when you would not want to hold the battery in your hand). We
strongly recommend that Box users get into the habit of pulling the battery back after each hit (this keeps the battery cooler and prevents accidental loss of the load and the charge).
Surprisingly, we have found that having the battery be stronger than that needed for one bowl actually has two disadvantages: 1) users are constantly wondering if the battery is ok on the 2nd and 3rd bowls, and 2) if a user happens to accidentally leave the unit 'on', stronger batteries tend to get hotter (in proportion to their storage capacity). We strongly suggest that people only get other batteries for the Box after they have developed a good set of usage habits with the provided batteries and are familliar with the capabilities of the device.
Haywood said:
...I really, really, really like using no tube at all. With no tube, the Launch Box is even nicer to handle (it's a tiny package), easier to shake/stir, and easier to empty and clean...
This is good, since this is/was the intended usage mode for which the Box was origionally designed/optimized. Anything that is provided as an attachment (tubes, whips, etc) is due to user choice, not because it is necessary. In fact, using the Box in its native mode has the specific advantages of 1) increased efficiency (since there is no condensation effect, there is no wasted/lost vapor), and 2) greater accuracy/sensitivity (since the temp/taste feedback is not muted by distance). We strongly suggest that people at least try to use the Box native as this will provide a much more satisfying experience overall.
Also, in the production Boxes (shipping now), we have even moved the draw hole a little lower so as to allow for using the Box when lying flat on your back. While this may not matter most of the time, there are situations where it makes a BIG difference.
Haywood said:
... more than that, I found that with any tube, I was coughing most of the time after the first or second puff of a given load. When I switched to using no tube, I stopped coughing. I'm not sure why...
This has been observed in prior testing as well. The narrower diameter of the draw tube increases the velocity of the vapor stream and "organizes" it so that it moves farther as a single strait column once it exits (within the confines of the mouth). This basically means that warm vapor is more likely to arrive at the back of the mouth, causing coughing -- not good! Using the Box native provides for a larger draw hole (lower stream velocity) and because its 'effective length' is very short, the vapor stream is less organized -- both effects place the vapor closer to the front of the mouth, which for various neurological reasons, mean less coughing (or none at all). It is a specific and very carefully thought out part of the Box design to ensure that the vapor channel is as short and as likely to place the vapor closer to the front of the mouth as possible -- where most of the users sensory capacities are.
Overall, the goal of the channel is to provide the maximum and most easy/natural user feedback and the maximum vapor (ie, little to no vapor condensation in the channel). One of the disadvantages of using any sort of draw stem at all is that it removes the user from directly sensing the vapor temperature and it provides a place for the vapor to condense.
Condensation is bad -- it means both lost vapor (less efficient) AND it makes eventual cleaning a requirement. The Box, used consistently in its native configuration
is specifically designed to never require cleaning. We are aware, however, that as a new product, this design intention may or may not be realized in some modes of user practice over the long term (years). Again, we provide the draw tubes because some users prefer it that way, either out of simple habit or some other necessity.
Haywood said:
...The wood didn't taste very good in the beginning though. Now I'm either used to it, or it's lost its taste...
Some of the Beta test units had this problem -- we eventually traced it back to a concurrent job that was getting processed in the shop where the woodworking was done. We believe that this problem has been fixed. However, some users may still find that they may experience some sort of 'breaking in' peroid as well -- we are also testing other woods to see if that makes any difference.
Haywood said:
...I use the temperature of the stream to determine how hard and long to draw, and I don't miss not being able to see the vapor stream at all...
Yes, this is as expected -- it is part of the energy calculation. As mentioned earlier, we worked hard to ensure that the energy delivered to the material is the absolutel minimum necessary to cause vaporization. This is for two reasons: 1) to maximize battery life/utility, and 2) to ensure that the vapor is never overheated. Among other things, this means that the vapor is not overly hot when recieved by the user, even though the draw point is only a short distance away. Our recommendation is to ensure that the lips are placed a little above and below the draw hole and to recieve the vapor in whole form into the open cavity of the mouth. If the temp/taste seems high, to draw a little faster (has a cooling effect), or alternately, to stop the heating and start over. It is best to leave a little bit of lung capacity to draw the remaining vapor fully into the lungs before releasing.
Haywood said:
...I have also switched to a steady long easy draw rather than the short "puff-pause-puff-pause" method I liked when I was using the rigid tube.
Yes -- a long steady draw is optimal. The steady state method is more vapor efficient and more accurately reflects the design method-of-usage intentions of the Box. It is especially cool to have the internal design and research so thouroughly confirmed in your practical experience with the Box.
Haywood said:
I had the opportunity to use the Launch Box at work for the first time yesterday. Work yesterday was in a 55' remote television production truck. About 20 people work in the truck at the same time, which is partitioned into four or five separate sections. The truck has a single ventilation system; if I open a baggie with really skunky stuff in it, everyone in the truck is yelling at me after ten seconds. Just opening the bag, mind you, not igniting anything, and I am NOT exaggerating (it happened once). So my assistant (and good friend) who sits next to me in the truck and I spent four hours and eight batteries vaping with the Launch Box while we worked. No one in the truck had any idea, and we were totally wasted the whole time.
Yes, this agrees with our prior testing as well. While most vaporizers will have significantly less smell than smoking, we believe (but have not yet confirmed) that this vape produces the
lowest level of secondary smell of any vape currently on the market (including and especially the Iolite). Mostly, this is a direct consequence of the design aspects above. The box has a small short channel system, and therefore, has very few parts in contact with the vapor -- fewer parts to re-radiate smell. The Box uses minimum energy (no preheating) and minimum exchange air volume, so that there is no smell associated with the aromatic components coming off while waiting for the unit to start up (there is no waiting with the Box).
Often, the only evident smell occurs when loading the Box (of course, preloading before arrival is an option here). Also, if you exhale directly into someones face, it is likely that they will smell something.
Usually however, anyone more than 3 feet away will not be able to smell anything at all. Your milage may vary -- all risks taken are exclusively your own -- use responsibly.
Haywood said:
This gave me the opportunity to see how hard it was to "teach" the Box to someone who was an expert smoker, but a neophyte in vaping (he had never vaped before). I explained that you controlled the Box by varying how hard and long you inhaled, and that it was very easy to inhale too rapidly, which would cause the screen to cool off too much and the Box to not work properly. I told him to wait ten seconds or so after inserting the battery before taking his first hit, and to remove the battery if he wasn't going to take another hit (or pass the Box) in the next 15 seconds. I also warned him that it would feel like it wasn't working because vaping isn't as hot and harsh as smoking. Since I wanted him to have the first two hits from a fresh load (for the taste), but he was clueless, I did the whole first bowl by myself, with him watching, so he could see how long a hit was, and so he could verify (for both of us) that no odor was getting into the truck. I reloaded the bowl, put in a fresh battery, and passed him the Box. After the first two or three hits, he commented that he didn't think it was working properly. At my insistence, he continued until the bowl was totally used up, but he was obviously disappointed.
Two minutes later he turned to me and mentioned he was whacked out of his mind, and that for a little wooden box that didn't work, it sure worked.
Thank you! This is an absolutely excellent, and as far as I can tell, as nearly perfect a technique for teaching someone else how to use the Box as any I know.
For anyone who wishes to show/demonstrate how to use the Box to someone else, please use Haywood's technique above as a guide!
Haywood said:
... the "no tube, steady breath" method is the way for me ...
For a lot of reasons, I think that where you are at now is going to remain the case. The native steady draw technique is the best currently known method of use. It is certantly known to be the most optimal/efficient technique possible.
-- Magic-flight